• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.595-646
• /
• 2000

I. Introduction Bi(痺) means blocking. BiJeung is one kind of symptoms making muscles, bones and jonts feel pain, numbness or edema. For example it can be gout or SLE etc. says that Bi is combination of PungHanSeup. And many doctors said that BiJeung is caused by food, fatigue, sex, stress and change of weather. Therefore we must treat BiJeung by character of patients and characteristic of the disease. Many famous doctors studied medical science by their fathers or teachers. So the history of medical science is long. So I studied ${\ll}Bijeungjujip{\gg}$. II. Final Decision 1. JoGeumTak(趙金鐸) devided BiJeung into Pung, Han, Seup and EumHeo, HeulHeo, YangHeo, GanSinHeo by charcter or reaction of pain. And he use DaeJinGyoTang, GyegiGakYakJiMoTang, SamyoSan, etc. 2. JangPaeGyeu(張沛圭) focused on division of HanYeol(寒熱; coldness and heat) in spite of complexity of BiJeung. He also used insects for treatment. They are very useful for treatment of BiJeung because they can remove EoHyeol(瘀血). 3. SeolMaeng(薛盟) said that the actual cause of BiJeung is Seup. So he thought that BiJeung can be divided into PungSeup, SeupYeol, HanSeup. And he established 6 rules to treat BiJeung and he studied herbs. 4. JangGi(張琪) introduced 10 prescriptions and 10 rules to cure BiJeung. The 1st prescription is for OyeSa, 2nd for internal Yeol, 3rd for old BiJeung, 4th for Soothing muscles, 5th for HanSeup, 6th for regular BiJeung, 7th for functional disorder, 8th for YeolBi, 9th for joint pain and 10th for pain of lower limb. 5. GangSeYoung(江世英) used PungYeongTang(風靈湯) for the treatment of PungBi, OGyeHeukHoTang(烏桂黑虎湯) for HanBi, BangGiMokGwaTang(防己木瓜湯) for SeupBi, YeolBiTang(熱痺湯) for YeolBi, WoDaeRyeokTang(牛大力湯) for GiHei, HyeolPungGeunTang(血楓根湯) for HyeolHeo, ToJiRyongTang(土地龍湯) for the acute stage of SeupBi, OJoRyongTang(五爪龍湯) for the chronic stage of SeupBi, and so on. 6. ShiGeumMook(施今墨) devided BiJeung into four types. They are PungSeupYeol, PungHanSeup, GiHyeolSil(氣血實) and GiHyeolHeo(氣血虛). And he introduced the eight rules of the treatment(SanPun(散風), ChukHan(逐寒), GeoSeuP(, CheongYeol(淸熱), TongRak(通絡), HwalHyeol(活血), HaengGi(行氣), BoHeo(補虛)). 7. WangYiYou(王李儒) explained the acute athritis and said that it can be applicable to HaneBi(行痺). And he used GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang(桂枝芍蘂知母湯) for HanBi and YeolBiJinTongTang(熱痺鎭痛湯) for YeolBi. 8. JangJinYeo(章眞如) said that YeolBi is more common than HanBi. The sympthoms of YeolBi are severe pain, fever, dried tongue, insomnia, etc. And he devided YeolBi into SilYeol and HeoYeol. In case of SilYeol, he used GyeoJiTangHapBaekHoTang(桂枝湯合白虎湯) and in case of HeoYeol he used JaEumYangAekTang(滋陰養液湯). 9. SaHaeJu(謝海洲) introduced three important rules of treatment and four appropriate rules of treatment of BiJeung. 10. YouDoJu(劉渡舟) said that YeolBi is more common than HanBi. He used GaGamMokBanGiTang(加減木防已湯) for YeolBi, GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang or GyeJiBuJaTang(桂枝附子湯) for HanBi and WooHwangHwan(牛黃丸) for the joint pain. 11. GangYiSon(江爾遜) focused on the internal cause. The most important internal cause is JeongGiHeo(正氣虛). So he tried to treat BiJeung by means of balance of Gi and Hyeol. So he ususlly used ODuTang(烏頭湯) and SamHwangTang(三黃湯) for YeolBi, OJeokSan(五積散) for HanBi, SamBiTang(三痺湯) for the chronic BiJeung. 12. HoGeonHwa(胡建華) said that to distinguish YeolBi from Hanbi is very difficult. So he used GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang in case of mixture of HanBi and YeoBi. 13. PiBokGo(畢福高) said that the most common BiJeung is HanBi. He usually used acupuncture with medicine. He followed the theory of EumYongHwa(嚴用和)-he focused on SeonBoHuSa(先補後瀉). 14. ChoiMunBin(崔文彬) used GeoPungHwalHyeolTang(祛風活血湯) for HanBi, SanHanTongRakTang(散寒通絡湯) for TongBi(痛痺), LiSeupHwaRakTang(利濕和絡湯) for ChakBi(着痺), CheongYeolTongGyeolChukBiTang(淸熱通經逐痺湯) for YeolBi(熱痺) and GeoPungHwalHyeolTang(祛風活血湯) for PiBi(皮痺). 15. YouleokSeon(劉赤選) introduced the common principle for the treatment of BiJeung. He used HaePuneDeungTang(海風藤湯) for HaengBi(行痺), SinChakTang(腎着湯), DokHwalGiSaengTang(獨活寄生湯) for TongBi(痛痺), TongPungBang(痛風方) for ChakBi(着痺) and SangGiYiMiTangGaYeongYangGakTang(桑枝苡米湯加羚羊角骨) for YeolBi(熱痺). 16. LimHakHwa(林鶴和) said about TanTan(movement disorders or numbness) and devided TanTan into the acute stage and the chronic stage. He used acupuncture at the meridian spot like YeolGyeol(列缺), HapGok(合谷), etc. And he also used MaHwangBuJaSeSinTang(麻黃附子細辛湯) in case of the acute stage. In the chronic stage he used BangPungTang(防風湯). 17. JinBaekGeun(陳伯勤) liked to use three rules(HwaHyeol(活血), ChiDam(治痰), BoSin(補腎)) to treat BiJeung. He used JinTongSan(鎭痛散) for the purpose of HwalHyeol(活血), SoHwalRakDan(小活絡丹) for ChiDam(治痰) and DokHwalGiSaengTang(獨活寄生湯) for BoSin(補腎). 18. YimGyeHak(任繼學) focused on YangHyeolJoGi(養血調氣) if the stage of BiJeung is chronic. And in the chronic stage he insisted on not using GalHwal(羌活), DokHwal(獨活) and BangPung(防風).

• 한국육종학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.654-659
• /
• 2009

"청청진미"는 중부평야지 및 중서부해안지 적응 소비료적성 고품질 벼품종을 육성할 목적으로 1993년 하계에 국립식량과학원 벼품종개발연구팀에서 이리401호와 일품벼를 인공교배하여 SR19633의 교배번호를 부여하고, 1993/1994년 동계에 수원에서 $F_1$ 18개체를 양성하였다. 1995년 하계에 $F_2$ 936개체를 포장에 전개하여 우량개체를 선발하여 집단으로 $F_3$ 및 $F_4$ 세대를 진전시키고, $F_5{\sim}F_9$ 세대는 계통육종법에 따라 유망개체 선발과 세대를 진전시켰다. $F_9$ 세대에서 선발된 유망계통을 '03~'05년 3개년 간 생산력검정 시험결과, 수량성이 높으며 소비료적성과 쌀 외관품위가 양호하고 밥맛이 좋은 SR19633-B-B-34-3-3-3-1 계통을 선발하여 '수원509호'로 계통명을 부여하였다. '수원509호'는 '06~'08년 3개년 간 지역적응시험을 실시한 결과, 소비료적성이 높은 중만생 고품질 다수성 계통으로 우수성이 인정되어 2008년 12월 농촌진흥청의 직무육성 신품종 선정 심의회에서 국가목록등재품종으로 선정되어 "청청진미"로 명명하였으며, 지역적응시험 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 보통기 재배에서 "청청진미"의 출수기는 8월17일로 소비벼 보다 4일 늦은 중만생종이며, 간장, 수수 및 수당립수는 각각 82 cm, 13개 및 126개이며 등숙율은 90.2%였다. 2. "청청진미"는 잎도열병, 흰잎마름병, 바이러스병 및 멸구류 등의 병해충에 약한 품종이다. 3. "청청진미"는 내냉성 검정에서 냉수구 임실율은 61%, 등숙기 수발아율은 1.6%였으며, 포장도복은 강한 경향이다. 4. "청청진미"는 질소 시비량 6 kg/10a의 소비재배에서 총건물중, 총질소량 및 Rubisco 활성이 소비벼보다 각각 9.4%, 19.7% 및 61.6% 높았다. 5. "청청진미"의 쌀 외관은 심복백 없이 맑고 투명하며, 현미 천립중 21.1 g의 중립종이고, 단백질 및 아밀로스 함량은 각각 5.4% 및 18.1%이고, 식미치는 0.27로 화성벼 -0.04보다 높았다. 6. "청청진미"의 완전미율은 96.9%로 높아서 완전미 도정수율이 72.5%로 소비벼보다 11.3% 높았다. 7. "청청진미"의 쌀 수량성은 보통기 소비료재배에서 중부평야지, 호남평야지 및 영남평야지 평균 5.10 MT/ha로 소비벼와 비슷한 수준 이었고, 보통기 보비재배에서 5.73 MT/ha로 소비벼 보다 9% 증수되었다.