• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.85-94
• /
• 1999

It is very signigicant to study a dominant drift of the contemporary formative art. And it's research not only gives us a great pleasure of study but also will be a big help for designers to study how the dominant drift of the contemporary art has developed thereafter, and what it has influenced upon the following formative movement of it. In this sense I think I cannot emphasize it too strong that I gave a subtitle 'Especially analyzed in War and Peace' do my paper because we can find a real aspect of the formative movement rather by sociological point of view than by formative art itself. In this sense, 1 selected Art Deoo as a thesis of research among other things because Art Deco developed socially in respond to general pressure to adapt to modem World, specially, was a stage in an already burgeoning revolution in the decorative arts. Through this sociological point of view on Art Deco I found lots of things worthwhile to research it Art Deco, which I think shows us a special aspect of the sandwich culture between both world wars in Europe, played the important role of a bridge likning its peculiar style with those of contemporary arts in Europe. In this paper the sociological research of Art Deco style will reveal what the European's emotions meant in the socio-psychological circumstances of Deco between both world wars, and where the peculiarity of Art Deco style came from, and especially why the colors of Art Deco was so gorgeous as called 'color for color's sake'. I tried to put the importance of research of Art Deco largely on the sociological or socio-psychological points of view not on the only formative viewpoints. I could draw a conclusion that Art Deco has a contradictive duplicity in its style that can be expressible in a word like 'naivety in gorgeousness, simplicity in complexity, orderliness in confusion, and peacefulness in noisiness'.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제64권1호
• /
• pp.95-116
• /
• 2018

Although acclaimed as George Eliot's masterpiece, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life (1871-72) has been attacked by feminists since shortly after it was serialized. The main cause of feminist criticism is that she portrays her heroine, Dorothea Brooke, in an androcentric viewpoint and describes her lived experiences through male discourses. In order to identify what such feminist criticism originates in, this article places the novel in the sociopolitical contexts where Dorothea lived while authoring herself, and then analyzes it with M. M. Bakhtin's two important concepts, self-authoring and architectonics. As a result, Middlemarch has many shortcomings in the phases of the heroine's self-authoring and eventually the architectonics. In case of self-authoring, Eliot does not fully explain Dorothea's responses to her first husband and egoistic priest Edward Casaubon, and then her second husband and English-Polish dilettante Will Ladislaw until she reaches her ultimate marriage conclusions. Incessant authorial intervention obstructs the heroine's smooth interactions with her two husbands. In addition, the novel does not provide any sufficient comments about Dorothea's responses to Middlemarchers' opinions even if handling their opinions in the heroine's self-authoring influences the novel's persuasiveness. Dorothea's story has proved its own limitations by its frequent omissions and authorial intrusions. In Bakhtin's terminology, Middlemarch does not properly contain I-formyself, the-other-for-me, and I-for-the-other. It can be said that these shortcomings resulting from Eliot's cross-dressing narrative have caused attacks by feminists.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제56권1호
• /
• pp.253-275
• /
• 2022

Niklas Luhmann은 사회학 이론가들 중 가장 논쟁적이고 난해한 학자이면서 동시에 근 10년간 후속연구가 증가하고 있는 학자이다. 이 연구의 목적은 Luhmann의 후속연구들이 Luhmann의 난해한 개념을 어떻게 사용하고 있는지를 관찰하는 것이다. 이 연구는 선행연구와 달리 분석의 단위를 논문이 아니라 키워드로 채택하였다. 키워드는 개념을 관찰 가능하게 만드는 언어적 구성물이기 때문이다. Web of Science의 검색결과 나온 139편의 사회과학 분야 논문의 키워드를 동시출현빈도 분석하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가장 중요한 키워드가 Luhmann의 이름과 이론의 이름이었다. 둘째, 클러스터링은 사회적 체계 이론, 일반체계이론, 법 체계와 정치체계, Luhmann 이론의 사회이론적 의의 등 4가지로 묶였다. 셋째, 핵심어가 'systems theory(일반체계이론)', 'communication(소통)', 'Autopoiesis(자기생산)', 'risk(위험)', 'legal system(법 체계)', 'functional differentiation(기능적 분화)', 'environment(환경)', 'social theory(사회적 이론)', 'sociological theory(사회학적 이론)', 'structural coupling(구조적 연결)', 'systems(체계들)', 'evolution(진화)'로 도출되었다. 이 연구의 의의는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 핵심어를 도출해내 Luhmann의 이론을 처음 접근하는 사람들에게 유용한 접근점을 제공하였다. 둘째, 난해한 이론적 연구의 동향 분석에도 키워드 네트워크를 통한 내용분석이 가능함을 증명하였다.

• 복식
• /
• 제55권7호
• /
• pp.156-170
• /
• 2005

As contemporary art tends to diverge from its fixed genres and intends to appeal to the public, fashion comes to contribute to the contemporary art area, by playing an important part in the creation of artistic value of art work. Nowadays, it is not unusual to see fashion work shown in an art exhibition parallel with art work, since some artists adopt costumes as the medium of their work in order to explore various means of expression. The occurrence of philosophical, sociological theories concerning human body parallelled with the prevalence of the post-structuralist ideas and occurrence of various styles of artistic expressions of body encouraged active research and attracted social attention to body. With such background, fashion art was formed by a means of the integration of body and fashion in order to create extreme artistic expression. 1 intend to investigate a variety of trends in fashion art from the viewpoint of body space. This study developed criteria for fashion image in contemporary art. Those criteria are based on the dichotomy that divides body into inner aspects and outer aspects. According to the criteria, Firstly, the extension type of body shape includes enlargement and reduction as its sub-types. Secondly, the opening-closure type includes opening type and closure type as its sub-types. Thirdly, the intensity type categorizes clothes into uniqueness and hybridity. Dynamism type classifies fashion art into fixation and moving. The various expressions of clothes type are interpreted as a means by which we can criticize many phenomena of modern society, such as loss of humanity, isolation of individuals, loss of identity, commercialism, and materialism. In the latter period of modern society, the integration of the double-faced nature of body and spirit was attempted and popular fashion was introduced into art in order to express desire, death, gender, identity, and sexual pleasure.