• Title/Summary/Keyword: simultaneous bilingual child

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Korean Nominal Particles Development in Korean-English Simultaneous Bilingual Children (혼자놀이에서 5-6세 '한국어-영어' 동시습득 이중언어아동의 한국어 조사(助詞) 습득분석)

  • Lee, Ha-Won;Choi, Kyoung-Sook
    • Korean Journal of Child Studies
    • /
    • v.29 no.6
    • /
    • pp.147-161
    • /
    • 2008
  • The present study compared characteristics of Korean nominal particles (occurrence, error, error patterns) of ten 5- to 6-year-old Korean-English simultaneous bilingual children with ten Korean monolingual children. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman Rank Correlation and by qualitative analysis. Results were (1) bilingual children showed significantly lower frequency based on the number of occurrence of nominal particles per utterance. (2) The error percentage of adverbial markers was significantly higher for bilingual children. (3) Error patterns of bilingual children showed a higher percentage of in-case substitution and double use error. These findings suggest that Korean-English simultaneous bilingual children have a different Korean nominal particles development from Korean monolingual children.

  • PDF

The Development of Postverbal Negation in Korean in a Korean-English Bilingual Child (한국어와 영어 두 언어를 동시에 습득하는 한국어린이의 한국어 후치부정어 습득에 대한 연구)

  • Kim, Myung-Sook
    • Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
    • /
    • v.20 no.4
    • /
    • pp.383-419
    • /
    • 2009
  • This study investigates the developmental process of Korean postverbal negation in a Korean-English bilingual child. The purposes of this study are firstly to find both common and divergent paths in the development of Korean postverbal negation in terms of both syntactic development and pragmatic uses of postverbal negation; and secondly to investigate explanations for the special pattern of development observed. The data were collected from one bilingual child (R) who is simultaneously acquiring two languages, Korean and English over two years between the ages of 5;00 and 700 (years; months). The data collection was carried out in four periods in two different environments: Periods I and III in Australia, Periods II and IV in Korea. The development of postverbal negation showed that when R was in Australia, she employed both L1 and L2 learning mechanisms, while when she was in Korea, she employed L1 learning mechanisms. The results reveal that L1 and L2 mechanisms are not basically different because R shows both forward and backward developmental features in conjunction with the two different language environments: Korea and Australia.

  • PDF