• 디지털콘텐츠학회 논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.203-210
• /
• 2016

한국어는 문장 구성소의 생략과 수식 범위가 자유롭기 때문에 파싱보다는 형태소 분석 단계에서 처리하면 좋은 경우가 있다. 본 논문에서는 파싱의 부담을 덜어 줄 수 있는 형태소 분석기의 기능 확장 방안을 제안한다. 이 방법은 미지어의 추정, 복합 명사 및 복합동사의 처리, 숫자 및 심볼의 처리에 의해 여러 형태소 열이 하나의 구문 범주를 가질 때 이것을 최장일치 방법으로 결합하고 의미 자질을 부여하여 하나의 구문 단위로 처리하는 것이다. 제안한 형태소 분석 방법은 불필요한 형태론적 모호성이 제거되고 형태소 분석 결과가 줄어들어 태거 및 파서의 정확률이 향상되었다. 또한, 실험을 통해 파싱트리는 평균 73.4%, 파싱 시간은 평균 52.9%로 줄었음을 보인다.

• 전자공학회논문지CI
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2002

한국어 형태론에 대한 기존의 전산모형은 선형적인 것들로 단어 내부구조 분석보다 형태소 분리 문제에만 관심을 두고 있다. 이러한 선형적 전산모형을 구문 분석 과정과 통합적으로 고려할 경우, 구문 단위 요소의 형성을 위해 형태소 분석 결과를 묶어야만 하는 추가적인 과정이 필요할 뿐만 아니라 의미적 직관성을 얻기도 어려웠다. 본 논문에서는 형태소 분리와 구문 요소 형성뿐만 아니라 단어의 구조 분석까지도 통합적으로 다룰 수 있는 단어통사론적 시각에 따른 전산 모형을 제안한다. 먼저 형태소 분리와 변형 문제를 다루기 위해 2단계형태론의 형식화를 도입하고, 품사 문맥을 반영하기 위해 기능성 구분문자를 제안한다. 그리고 형태소의 통사적 결합 검사를 위해 GLR에 기반한 변형 알고리즘을 제안한다.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:소프트웨어및응용
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.505-515
• /
• 2004

육하원칙은 신문기사를 기술하는데 있어서 가장 기본적인 요소로서 기사 내용 파악에 핵심적인 역할을 수행한다. 본 논문은 이러한 육하원칙에 기반 하여 기술되는 신문기사의 특성에 주목하여, 육하원칙 활성화도를 이용한 신문기사 요약 방법론을 제안한다. 제안하는 방법론은 기존의 요약 기법 중 가장 우수한 방법으로 알려진 두문 기반 기법(lead-based method)과 제목 기반 기법(title-based method)의 문제점을 극복하기 위해, 제목과 두문의 정보를 결합시켜 충분한 어휘정보를 확보하도록 하였다. 특히 육하원칙 활성화도, 육하원칙 범주 개수, 문장 길이, 문장의 위치 둥과 같은 다양한 요소들을 문장 중요도 계산에 반영함으로써 보다 중요한 정보를 포함하면서도 가독성이 높은 문장들이 요약문으로 선택될 수 있도록 고려하였다. 제안된 방법론의 정확률은 74.7%로서 기존의 두문 기반 기법보다 우수한 성능을 보였으며, 신문기사를 자동 요약하는데 있어서 충분히 효과적으로 사용될 수 있는 방법론임을 실험을 통해 입증하였다.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.1-25
• /
• 2004

This paper examines two different approaches to resolving a theoretical problem which the bottom-up approach version of Discourse Representation Theory of Kamp et al. (2003) faces in dealing with anaphoric relations between pronouns and their potential antecedents in conditional sentences where consequent clauses precede their corresponding conditional clauses. In one of the approaches, every element is processed in the order of occurrence and conditional operators in a non-sentence-initial position cause the ongoing DR to split in two with the same index. The definition of accessibility is accordingly modified so that the right DR can be accessible from the left DR. In the other approach, a different type of discourse representation structure, K ${\Leftarrow}$ K, is introduced, which allows us to resolve the target problem without modifying accessibility proposed in Kamp et al. (2003). Compatibility of these two approaches with the bottom-up version of DRT is evaluated by examining their applicability to the analysis of quantified sentences where pronominal expressions precede generalized quantifiers.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2008

This paper proposes a dynamic approach to anaphoric resolution in conjunction phrases, in terms of Discourse Representation Theory. Unlike Kamp, van Genabith, and Reyle (forthcomming)'s analysis, it proposes two different types of discourse representation structures for conjunction phrases; one for coordinate phrases such as and conjunction phrases and the other one for subordination conjunction phrases such as when subordination phrases. Following Chung (1992), Chung (2004), every element is processed in the order of occurrence and conjunction operators in a non-sentence-initial position cause the ongoing DR to split in two with the same index. DRS conditions and accessibility are accordingly modified so that DRs for conjunction clauses can be accessible from DRs for main clauses.

• 음성과학
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.89-104
• /
• 2004

This paper investigates previous theories on English focus realization and attempts to find out the overall acoustic characteristics of English focus. It has been argued in previous studies that English focus can be defined as a new information that is not recoverable from the context (Halliday 1967), a complementary element of presupposition (Jackendoff 1972), and what is predicated about the topic in a sentence (Sgall 1973, Gundel 1974). The phonetic realization of English focus in an utterance has been said to be either L+H*/H*, or falling accent. Yet it is a more or less simplified pattern not based on real data obtained from native speakers of English, and it does not consider the various pragmatic and contextual situations. In our experiments we found that native speakers uttered English focus sentences in different ways according to the different focus structure. Another notable result is that Korean speakers, when provided with the same experimental material, are neither able to distinguish different focus types nor deaccent the elements that are not focused in an utterance.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.276-285
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to investigate the pattern and characteristics of elementary school teaching and learning processes in science based classes. The study participants' class was recorded in video and instructional conversation transcription. The pattern of the observed class was analyzed using the classification frame suggested by Mogan &Saxton(2006). In result, the questioning for elicit information was most frequent and questioning for shape understanding and the questioning for press for reflection in its priority. In result, the presence of elicited questioning for the attainment of knowledge and understanding is more prominent in science-based classrooms. It was revealed that the participating teachers used the questioning sentence pattern more frequently and the self-sustained inquiry that accelerates creative thinking of the student was lacking. It was discovered that teaching elicited questioning, which accelerates creative thinking, as well as fact confirmation pattern is a necessary element of training for teachers.

• 한국영어학회지:영어학
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.279-285
• /
• 2002

English allows conjoined wh-questions to have two different readings. The English sentence Which person does John like and Mary admire\ulcorner involves ATB movement and is understood either as single questions requiring one set of individuals that are liked by John and admired by Mary (which person x, likes (j,x) & admires (m,x)) or as coordinated wh-questions, allowing distinct individuals that John likes and Mary admires (which person x, likes (j,x) & which person y, admires (m,y)). I argue this ambiguity is explained by the two key assumptions about wh-movement in Chomsky (1995): (1) Movement is copying. (2) wh-phrases consist of a wh-element and a nominal restrictor. This yields two possible LFs for English depending on whether [Wh+nominal] or wh alone is interpreted as a variable. It is therefore natural for me to propose that number of questions understood corresponds to the number of nominal segments at LF.

• 철학연구
• /
• 제116권
• /
• pp.257-280
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 우선 일차적으로 양상논리학체계를 국어의 통사론적 구조 하에서 재구성하는 것이고, 둘째로 이를 구성주의 인식론의 관점에서 해석하는 것이다. 말하자면, 본 연구는 논리학에 대한 인식론적 해석, 즉 일종의 메타-논리학적 연구이다. 본 연구는 논리(규칙) 및 논리학적 체계는 선험적으로 우리 정신에 주어진 원리가 아니라, 인식 주관이 외적 대상들을 조작하는 행동들 중에서 반복적으로 작용하는 메커니즘들을 형식적으로 구조화하는 데서 성립한다는 것을 정당화하고자 한다. 말하자면, 논리규칙의 후험적 구성주의 논제를 정당화하고자 한다. 따라서 본 연구는 일체의 논리적 구조들을 심리학적 구조들에로 환원을 시도하는 일종의 환원주의이다. 필자가 강조하는 논리적 구성의 두 계기는 체계의 닫힘과 새로운 모순의 발견이다. 따라서 여기서는 명제계산체계 내에 있는 모순을 지적하고 이를 극복하기 위해서 양상논리가 출현하게 되었다는 것과 그럼에도 불구하고 이 체계 역시 새로운 모순을 만난다는 것을 증명하고자 한다. 결국 논리의 구성주의의 논제는 상위의 체계는 하위의 체계에 없던 새로운 제한적 속성이 등장한다는 것을 해명하는 것이 될 것이다.

• 대한음성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한음성학회 1996년도 10월 학술대회지
• /
• pp.246-246
• /
• 1996

Purpose: Some of the properties of the prosodic phrasing and some acoustic and phonological effects of contrastive focus on the tonal pattern of Seoul Korean is explored based on a brief experiment of analyzing the fundamental frequency(=FO) contour of the speech of the author. Data Base and Analysis Procedures: The examples were chosen to contain mostly nasal and liquid consonants, since it is difficult to track down the formants in stops and fricatives during their corresponding consonantal intervals and stops may yield an effect of unwanted increase in the FO value due to their burst into the following vowel. All examples were recorded three times and the spectrum of the most stable repetition was generated, from which the FO contour of each sentence was obtained, the peaks with a value higher than 250Hz being interpreted as a high tone (=H). The result is then discussed within the prosodic hierarchy framework of Selkirk (1986) and compared with the tonal pattern of the Northern Kyungsang dialect of Korean reported in Kenstowicz & Sohn (1996). Prosodic Phrasing: In N.K. Korean, H never appears both on the object and on the verb in a neutral sentence, which indicates the object and the verb form a single Phonological Phrase ($={\phi}$), given that there is only one pitch peak for each $={\phi}$. However, Seoul Korean shows that both the object and the verb have H of their own, indicating that they are not contained in one $={\phi}$. This violates the Optimality constraint of Wrap-XP (=Enclose a lexical head and its arguments in one $={\phi}$), while N.K. Korean obeys the constraint by grouping a VP in a single $={\phi}$. This asymmetry can be resolved through a constraint that favors the separate grouping of each lexical category and is ranked higher than Wrap-XP in Seoul Korean but vice versa in N.K. Korean; $Align-x^{lex}$ (=Align the left edge of a lexical category with that of a $={\phi}$). (1) nuna-ka manll-ll mEk-nIn-ta ('sister-NOM garlic-ACC eat-PRES-DECL') a. (LLH) (LLH) (HLL) ----Seoul Korean b. (LLH) (LLL LHL) ----N.K. Korean Focus and Phrasing: Two major effects of contrastive focus on phonological phrasing are found in Seoul Korean: (a) the peak of an Intonatioanl Phrase (=IP) falls on the focused element; and (b) focus has the effect of deleting all the following prosodic structures. A focused element always attracts the peak of IP, showing an increase of approximately 30Hz compared with the peak of a non-focused IP. When a subject is focused, no H appears either on the object or on the verb and a focused object is never followed by a verb with H. The post-focus deletion of prosodic boundaries is forced through the interaction of StressFocus (=If F is a focus and DF is its semantic domain, the highest prominence in DF will be within F) and Rightmost-IP (=The peak of an IP projects from the rightmost $={\phi}$). First Stress-F requires the peak of IP to fall on the focused element. Then to avoid violating Rightmost-IP, all the boundaries after the focused element should delete, minimizing the number of $={\phi}$'s intervening from the right edge of IP. (2) (omitted) Conclusion: In general, there seems to be no direct alignment constraints between the syntactically focused element and the edge of $={\phi}$ determined in phonology; all the alignment effects come from a single requirement that the peak of IP projects from the rightmost $={\phi}$ as proposed in Truckenbrodt (1995).