• 대한원격탐사학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한원격탐사학회 2004년도 Proceedings of ISRS 2004
• /
• pp.598-600
• /
• 2004

In Europe most Earth Observation (EO) data users rely on several EO missions, both to increase sustainability of their service and to widen the range of observation parameters. In addition to its own missions such as ERS 1 &2, ENVISAT and the Earth Explorers, ESA therefore offers access to the scientific and applications community to so-called 'Third Party Missions'. Third Party (TP) missions are complementing the observations of ESA missions, are used to prepare for future ESA missions including cross-calibration and create synergy to favor a wider use of EO data within ESA Member States.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2009

This study was conducted to generate fundamental data required by food coordinators and food space creators for planning and directing table settings. The results of this study were then used to suggest an ideal model of table settings for Korean-style food equipped with simple, sophisticated, and practical characteristics. Specifically, this study evaluated the importance of hygiene (safety, cleanness, arrangement), decoration (dignity, form, stylishness, presentation of food on plates), naturalness (seasonal beauty, comfortableness, natural beauty), and modernity (modern style, chic style, urban style). These factors were evaluated according to the preference of the table setting and the characteristics of the meeting, which fit various meal cultures, times, places, and objectives. The results of this study indicate that people prefer hygiene and decoration for family meetings (bansang setting), hygiene and modernity for friendly meetings (simple buffet setting), hygiene and decoration for company meetings (simple buffet setting), and hygiene and decoration for academic meetings (tea party). Hygiene and decoration were highly evaluated in most cases, which indicates that individuals at meetings for special purposes give weight to the meeting's atmosphere, but also consider the hygiene and cleanliness of the food.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신재생에너지학회 2006년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.47-49
• /
• 2006

The Sea of Okhotsk is the unique area providing the highest methane production rate of the northern hemisphere. The area of focused fluid venting offshore the NE Sakhalin continental slope was investigated during the CHAOS (Hydro-Carbon Hydrate Accumulations in the Okhotsk Sea) expeditions onboard of RV "Akademik Lavrentyev" In 2003, 2005 and 2006. The International Research Project CHAOS (Russia-Korea-Japan) aimed at the study of gas hydrate formation processes associated with the fluid venting in the Sea of Okhotsk. Several new gas hydrate accumulations were discovered during the cruise. Hydrate-associated structures have been named as KOPRI, VNIIOKeangeologia, POI and KIT (the names of cruise participant institutes) Some of hydrate-bearing cores contain big amount of gas hydrates: massive gas hydrate layers (up to 35cm thick) were recovered. The shallowest submarine gas hydrate accumulations in the world (at the depth less then 400m) were discovered during the cruise.

• 한국지구물리탐사학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지구물리탐사학회 2008년도 공동학술대회
• /
• pp.137-140
• /
• 2008

2003년, 2006년과 2007년, 사할린 북동사면 $53^{\circ}56'\;N$, $143^{\circ}52'\;E$ to $54^{\circ}40'\;N$, $144^{\circ}32'\;E$ 지역에서 음향측심, side-scan sonar (SSS), 고해상도 스파커 탄성파 탐사를 포함한 다양한 주파수 대역의 음향탐사를 실시하였다. 높은 후방산란강도를 가진 약 130여개의 메탄분출구들이 해저면에 발달해 있는 SSS 영상도를 획득하였다. 음향측심탐사에서의 수층 가스분출구조와 탄성파탐사에서의 해저지층 가스기둥구조들이 이 해저면 구조들과 잘 부합하여 나타난다. 이런 메탄분출구조들은 북서 주향을 갖는 Lavrentiev 단층과 평행한 구조선을 따라 배열하는 것처럼 보인다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권34호
• /
• pp.93-127
• /
• 2014

During the four years following the sinking of the Cheonan frigate in 2010, the South Korean public opinion has seen changes in four basic ways. First, public polls with respect to the cause of the sinking show that 70% of the people consider North Korea as the culprit, while 20% maintain that it was not an act carried out by North Korea. Second, the opinions relative to the cause of the incident seem to vary according to age difference, generational difference, and educational difference. From 2011, people in their 20s showed 10% increase in regarding North Korea as the responsible party. People in their 30s and 40s still have a tendency not to believe the result of the investigation carried out by the combined military and civilian group. Third, the most prominent issue that arose aftermath of the Cheonan incident is the fact that political inclination and policy preference are influencing the scientific determination of the cause. In other words, scientific and logical approach is lacking in the process of determining the factual basis for the cause. This process is compromised by the inability of the parties concerned in sorting out what is objective and what is personal opinion. This confused state of affairs makes it difficult to carry on a healthy, productive debate. Fourth, rumors, propaganda, and disinformation generated by pro-North Korea Labor Party groups in the internet and SNS are causing considerable impact in forming the public opinion. Proposed Strategy 1. The administration can ascertain public trust by accurately determining the nature of the provocation based on accurate information in the early stages of the incident. 2. Education in scientific, logical, rational methodologyis needed at home, school, and workplace in order toenhance the people's ability to seek factual truths. 3. In secondary education, the values of freedom, human rights, democracy, and market economy must be reinforced. 4. It is necessary for the educational system to teach the facts of North Korea just as they are. 5. Fundamental strength of free democratic system must be reinforced. The conservative, mainstream powers must recognize the importance of self-sacrifice and societal duties. The progressive political parties must sever themselves from those groups that take instructions from North Korea's Labor Party. The progressives must pursue values that are based on fundamental human rights for all. 6. Korean unification led by South Korea is the genuine means to achieve peace in a nuclear-free Korean peninsula. The administration must recognize that this unification initiative is the beginning of the common peace and prosperity in the Far East Asia, and must actively pursue international cooperation in this regard.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제23권12호
• /
• pp.2107-2120
• /
• 2014

Natural environmental protection system in North Korea is rarely understood mainly because of lack of information in scientific and legislative fields. Legislation is very important to achieve goal for protected areas, which are described in "Natural Protected Area Law(NPAL)". Cabinet of North Korea has authorities to lead the Central Agency for Land and Environment Conservation(CALEC). Designation and managements of natural protected areas are regarded as CALEC and local governments responsibilities. There are many differences between South and North Korea. Especially legislation system has many differences. North Korea's Labor Party is superior to the Government and Labor Party's order has at least the same authority to regulate and manage the national policy and means. With NPAL, CALEC organizes the national plan for natural protected area and regulate the activities of the Agencies for Land and Environment Conservation in the aspects of action plan, budget and other resources. For the reunification in the future, legislation system of North Korea should be understood.

• 분석과 대안
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.31-69
• /
• 2018

This study examines the role of science in resolving trade disputes. After the Great East Japan Earthquake of 11 March 2011 that not only jeopardized the people of Japan, but also put the safety of an entire region at risk, the Republic of Korea (Korea) has imposed import bans as well as increased testing and certification requirements for radioactive material on Japanese food products. Japan has challenged these restrictions at the World Trade Organizations Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). This study aims to explain how international trade agreements and previous DSB rulings have dealt with different scientific viewpoints provided by confronting parties. In doing so, it will contrast the viewpoints espoused by Korean and Japanese representatives, and then analyzes the most similar case studies previously ruled on by the DSB, including the case of beef hormones and the case of genetically modified crops including biotech corn, both between the United States and the European Communities (EC). This study finds that science is largely subordinate to national interests in the case of state decision-making within the dispute settlement processes, and science has largely been relegated to a supportive role. Due to the ambiguity and lack of truly decisive decisions in the Appellate Body in science-based trade disputes, this study concludes that the Appellate Body avoids taking a firm scientific position in cases where science is still inconclusive in any capacity. Due to the panel's unwillingness to establish expert review boards as it has the power to do, instead favoring an individual-based system so that all viewpoints can be heard, it has also developed a system with its own unique weaknesses. Similar to any court of law in which each opposing party defends its own interests, each side brings whatever scientific evidence it can to defend its position, incentivizing them to disregard scientific conclusions unfavorable to their position. With so many questions that can arise, combined with the problems of evolving science, questions of risk, and social concerns in democratic society, it is no wonder that the panel views scientific information provided by the experts as secondary to the legal and procedural issues. Despite being ruled against the EC on legal issues in two previous cases, the EC essentially won both times because the panel did not address whether its science was correct or not. This failure to conclusively resolve a debate over whose science is more scientific enabled the EC to simply fix the procedural issues, while continuing to enforce trade restrictions based on their scientific evidence. Based on the analysis of the two cases of disputes, Korea may also find itself guilty of imposing an unwarranted moratorium on Japan's fish exports, only to subsequently pass new restrictions on labelling and certification requirements because Japan may have much scientific evidence at its disposal. However, Korea might be able to create enough uncertainty in the panel to force them to rule exclusively on the legal issues of the case. This will then equip Korea, like the EC in the past, with a way of working around the ruling, by changing whatever legal procedure they need to while maintaining some, if not most, of its restrictions when the panel fails to address its case on scientific grounds.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.501-524
• /
• 2002

Article 121 of the UNCLOS stipulates the regime of islands and grants different jurisdictions to islands and rocks. Especially, paragraph 3 gives different definitions and distinguishes the legal status of between islands and rocks. That is, rocks, which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life cannot have their own EEZ, continental shelf or the great-sphere maritime jurisdiction. In this paper various theories and state practicess on islands and rocks are examined with reference to Article 121 of UNCLOS. Also, the status of Dokdo as a rock or an island is examined in accordance with the interpretation of Article 121 of UNCLOS. National legislations, practices, and many scientific opinions are often contradictory and controversial with respect to the interpretation of Article 121 of the UNCLOS. However, it is believed that Article 121 of UNCLOS, particularly paragraph 3 has to be interpreted more strictly. That is because the highly developed modem scientific technology can be meaningless when the criteria of Article 121 of UNCLOS are to be inappropriately applied. Insular figures like ${\ulcorner}rocks{\lrcorner}$ could bring the inequitable effects disadvantageous toward the other party when the maritime delimitation is applied. Claiming and Intentionally extending maritime zone of a coastal states by assigning EEZ for small insular figures like ${\ulcorner}rocks{\lrcorner}$ is over-zealous nationalism which is illegal, and such practices must be recognized as actions bringing great harm to the neighboring nations and demise of the sprit of all mankind.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.519-547
• /
• 2004

본 논문은 2002년 3월 21일 EU의 제안서 제출로 시작된 DDA 각료선언문 para. 31(i)하에서 이루어지고 있는 무역-환경 논의쟁점에 기초하여 바이오안전성 맥락에서 특정무역의무 범위문제, 분쟁해결절차의 적용과 비당사국문제를 분석하였다. DDA 무역-환경 논의분석 결과에 기초하여 제시된 LMOs의 바이오안전성 확보를 위한 국가차원의 대응방향은 다음과 같다. 첫째, LMOs 수입국인 우리나라의 경우 넓은 범위의 바이오안전성의정서상 STOs의 WTO 수용은 LMOs 및 바이오산업에 손실에 초래시키지 않을 것이다. 오히려 수입 LMOs에 대한 안전성 확보를 위한 높은 수준의 보호를 보장할 것이다. 하지만, 수출국들은 LMOs의 수출에 대한 부정적인 영향을 보전하기 위해 다른 형태의 무역조치를 취할 수 있어, 그로 인한 영향을 감수해야 할 것이다. 수출국이 되는 경우 넓은 범위의 바이오안전성의정서상 STOs의 WTO 수용은 수출되는 LMOs 제품에 좋은 영향을 미치지는 못할 것이다. 따라서 생명공학기술의 진보속도 및 수준, LMOs 연구개발 및 생산추이 등과 STOs로 인한 여타 산업의 상황을 고려한 비용-편익분석을 통해 특정무역조치에 따른 시나리오를 구성하고, 시나리오별 중 단기 및 장기적 차원에서의 대응책을 마련해야 할 것이다. 둘째, 사회적 합리성에 근거하고 있는 바이오안전성의정서와 과학적 합리성에 근거하고 있는 WTO 규정은 상당 부분 상충되고 있어 분쟁해결시 어떠한 원칙을 적용할 것인가의 문제에 대한 합의는 쉽지 않을 것이다. 그렇기 때문에, 장기적인 논의가 요구되는 사안이다. 이러한 자원에서 LMOs 수입국인 우리나라는 현대생명공학기술에 의한 산물인 LMOs와 같은 신제품에 대해서는 과학적, 환경적, 사회 경제적 관점에서 다각적인 검토를 통한 국가간 이동에 대한 적절한 보호수준을 보장하기 위해 국제적 노력이 필요하다는 입장을 지속적으로 견지해야 할 것이다. 셋째, 바이오안전성의정서 당사국과 비당사국 간의 분쟁시 바이오안전성의정서 비당사국(만약, WTO 회원국일 경우)의 WTO 의무는 유효하다. 그렇기 때문에, 비당사국 바이오안전성의정서 당사국과의 LMOs 분쟁시 WTO 규정에 의한 문제해결을 시도할 것이다. 그렇지만, LMOs의 건전하고 안전한 이용을 위해서는 국가간 이동에 따른 적절한 보호수준을 보장해야만 한다. 이러한 맥락에서 우리나라는 MEAs를 충분히 고려해야 한다는 EU의 견해를 견지하되, 바이오안전성의정서 당사국과 비당사국(만약, WTO 회원국일 경우)간 분쟁가능성을 미연에 방지하기 위한 차원에서 바이오안전성 확보를 위한 무역규제조치 전 바이오안전성의정서에서 규정하고 있는 정책수단들을 적극 활용할 수 있는 방안을 다각도로 마련해야 할 것이다.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제27호
• /
• pp.197-222
• /
• 2009

강유위는 근대 중국 변법파의 대표적 인물로 동서고금을 가로지르는 그의 학문적 열정과 구세정신(救世精神)은 다양한 영역에서 괄목할 만한 성과를 만들어 냈다. 특히 전통을 비판적으로 수용하는 과정 속에서 그가 무기로 삼았던 서양 근대과학은 전통 '천도(天道)' 관념을 비판하는 데 매우 효과적이었으며, 이를 기초로 발전시킨 변화관과 연화(演化)사상은 그가 궁극적으로 추구하는 '대동사회(大同社會)'를 그려내는 데 막대한 영향을 미쳤다. 그는 서양의 근대 과학과 학술에 대해 강렬한 지적(知的) 욕구를 가지고 있었지만 체계적인 서학(西學) 교육을 받지 못했기에 여러 한계를 드러냈다. 그럼에도 불구하고 그의 사상역정은 양무운동 시기의 "기물(器物)"적 과학인식 태도를 벗어나 보편적 가치 체계로서 과학을 인식할 수 있는 계기를 마련했다는 점에서 매우 중요한 의의가 있다 강유위(康有爲)는 서양 진화론의 영향을 받아 비록 대동 이상을 제시하긴 하였지만 "대동극락(大同極樂)"이 "차안세계(此岸世界)"에서 절대로 실현될 수 없음을 잘 알고 있었기에 대동(大同)의 이상으로부터 이탈해 "천유(天遊)"경지로 관심을 돌리게 되었다. 즉 이상과 현실의 괴리, 그리고 그가 가정한 단선적(單線的) 대동주의(大同主義)의 실현 불가능에 대한 생각이 그를 "천유(天遊)" 경계로 나아가게 한 것이다. 강유위(康有爲)는 젊은 시절 그가 찬탄해 마지않았던 과학 기구가 사람의 인식능력을 확대시켜 "대도(大道)"에 가까이 가도록 해 준다는 점에는 여전히 동의하고 있었다. 하지만 "기물(器物)"과 인간 감관(感官)의 유한한 능력이 "천(天)"의 무한함에 비추어볼 때 보잘 것 없다는 것은 그를 절망적으로 만드는 점이었다. 그는 현실 사회와 정치를 개혁하는 데 있어서도 이런 비관적인 현실에 깊은 절망감을 느꼈다. 이런 비관주의적 경향은 그가 대동(大同) 이상을 추구하기보다 "천유(天遊)"경지에 경도되게 된 이유이며, 『대동서(大同書)』를 완성함과 동시에 곧바로 『제천강(諸天講)』을 저술함으로써 사람들이 혼란된 사회 속에서 인생 위안을 얻을 수 있는 "천유지학(天遊之學)"을 제창한 원인이라 할 수 있다.