• 제목/요약/키워드: safety campaign

검색결과 54건 처리시간 0.02초

대중매체 식품영양정보에 대한 성인 여성의 요구도 조사 (A Survey for Needs and Preference of Food and Nutrition information on Mass Media for Korean Female Adults)

  • 곽정은;이서연;이상훈;고광석
    • 대한지역사회영양학회지
    • /
    • 제19권6호
    • /
    • pp.550-557
    • /
    • 2014
  • Objectives: This study was conducted to examine the preferences and needs of typical Korean females adults for food and nutrition information provided by the mass media. Methods: A total of 343 females (77 in their 20s, 85 in their 30s, 88 in their 40s and 93 in their 50s) residing in the Seoul/Gyeonggido area was surveyed on general characteristics, main sources of food and nutrition information and needs for sources and contents of nutrition information. Results: The survey showed that typical Korean females obtained knowledge of food and nutrition mainly through the Internet (30.4%) and broadcasting (29.0%). Typical Korean females were interested in 'dietary management for weight control' (21.9%), 'the prevention and treatment of disease' (20.0%), 'food safety' (16.8%), 'proper dietary habits' (14.6%), 'cookery' (11.8%), 'functional foods' (9.6%), 'restaurant details' (3.5%) and 'life-cycle-specific dietary guideline' (1.6%). Needs for food and nutrition program forms on TV were 'educational programs' (34.3%), 'documentaries' (20.8), 'expert lecture-style' (13.0%), 'entertainment programs' (11.9%), 'expert conversation' (11.4%), 'news-style' (4.6%) and 'public campaign advertisements' (4.0%). On the Internet, 38.6% of the respondents preferred to get information provided by food and nutrition-related institutions (38.6%) while 26.1% preferred webtoons for nutritional information. The favored forms in mobile applications were 'monitoring their diets' (29.5%), 'data-based texts information' (21.4%), 'experts feedback' (20.6%), 'communities' (15.1%) and 'games' (13.1%). The rates of the preference to obtain information from experts such as nutritionists and dietitians and doctorsor dietitian turned reporters increased markedly with older ages. Conclusions: Since the mass media is a main source of food and nutrition information for the general public, the effectiveness and accuracy of the information provided should be enhanced by taking the needs of the public into account. The quality of information should be improved by involving more nutrition experts.

도시철도용 비상방송시스템을 위한 무선통신방식 연구 (A Study on the Wireless Communication Method for Emergency Broadcasting System in Metro Environments)

  • 장수현;신대교;윤상훈;정한균;진성근;임기택
    • 한국ITS학회 논문지
    • /
    • 제17권6호
    • /
    • pp.202-210
    • /
    • 2018
  • 최근 열차사고 혹은 단전/단선 등의 비상상황 시 방송장치 고장에 따른 객실 안내 방송 불가로 인한 2차사고 발생률이 증가하고 있다. 이에, 철도 운행 경로 상 어떤 비상상황이 발생하여도 편성 단위의 열차에 안내방송을 할 수 있는 시스템 구축의 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 터널 등 열악한 철도 운행환경에서 단차, 단선 등의 사고로 열차방송을 사용할 수 없을 경우를 대비하여 기존 통신 중계인프라에 독립된 무선통신방식을 검토하고, 대상 통신장치를 실제 철도 운행 환경(굴신률이 큰 터널 등) 하에서 통신성능 평가를 수행하였으며, 이를 통해 비상방송시스템을 위한 무선통신 기술로써의 적용성을 고찰한다.

국내 회전교차로 설계지침 적용에 따른 속도패턴과 개선효과 분석 - 부산광역시를 중심으로 - (An Analysis of Velocity Patterns and Improvement Effect after Application of Domestic Roundabout Design Guidelines (Focusing on Busan Metropolitan City))

  • 임창식;최양원
    • 대한토목학회논문집
    • /
    • 제33권1호
    • /
    • pp.305-316
    • /
    • 2013
  • 현대식 회전교차로의 장점이 부산광역시 내의 운전자 행태 및 여건에서도 그 효과가 있는지를 검증하기 위해 회전교차로 도입에 따른 사전 사후 효과분석을 수행하였다. 회전교차로에서의 속도프로파일을 분석한 결과 차량간 속도의 편차가 낮아지고, 회전차로부의 평균주행속도가 회전차로의 설계속도에 근접하여 대부분의 회전차로가 이상적으로 설치된 것으로 분석되었다. 교통운영 측면에서는 평균통행속도가 신호교차로를 회전교차로로 전환 시에서는 평균 약 87.2% 향상되는 것으로 분석되어 회전교차로의 도입이 통행속도 및 지체측면에서 효과가 있는 것으로 판명되었다. 또한, 신호교차로를 회전교차로로 전환 시 연간 발생되는 편익은 교통소통 측면에서 4억1천만원, 교통안전 측면에서 3천9백만원, 에너지절감 측면에서 2억5천5백만원, 대기오염절감 편익에서는 9천5백만원, 그리고 신호등 설치비용 편익에서 7천3백만원으로 총 8억7천2백만원의 편익이 발생하는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 부산광역시 전체 신호교차로 1,926개소의 10%인 193개소를 회전교차로로 전환한다면, 연간 부산광역시 예산의 약 1천6백8십3억원을 절약할 수 있다. 또한 회전교차로 사업투자비용 대비 회전교차로 설치로 인한 편익분석 결과, 회전교차로 1개소당 6억7천9백만원의 사업비 절감액이 발생되며, 부산광역시 신호교차로의 10%를 고려하면 연간 약 1천3백1십억원의 사업비 절감효과를 기대할 수 있다. 회전교차로 내에서의 교통사고는 운전자의 통행우선권 미인지로 인한 것으로 회전교차로의 통행우선권이 자리 잡게 되면 충분히 감소될 여지가 있는 것으로 판단되며, 회전교차로에서의 자동차 운전자, 보행자, 자전거 이용자의 교육 및 홍보가 시급히 이루어져야 한다.

가습기살균제 참사의 진행과 교훈(Q&A) (Questions and Answers about the Humidifier Disinfectant Disaster as of February 2017)

  • 최예용
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-22
    • /
    • 2017
  • 'The worstest environment disaster', 'World's first biocide massacre', 'Home-based Sewol ferry disaster' are all phrases attached to the recent humidifier disinfectant disaster. In the spring of 2011, four of 8 pregnant women including 1 adult man passed away at a university hospital in Seoul due to breathing failure. Epidemiologic investigation conducted by the Korean CDC soon revealed the inhalation of humidifier disinfectant, which had been widely used in Korea during the winter, to be responsible for the disease. As well as lung fibrosis hardening of the lungs, other diseases including asthma, rhinitis, skin disease, liver disease, fetal disease or cancers have been researched for their relation with exposure to the products. By February 9, 2017, 5,342 cases had registered for health problems and 1,131 of them were already dead (20.8% mortality rate). Based on studies by government agencies and a telephone survey of the general population by Seoul National University and civic groups, around 20% of the general public of Korea has used these products. Since the market release of the first product by SK Chemical in 1994, over 7.1 million items from around 20 brands were sold up to 2011. Most of the products were manufactured by well-known large conglomerates such as SK, Lotte, Samsung, Shinsegye, LG, and GS, as well as some European companies including UK-based Reckitt Benckiser and TESCO, the German firm Henkel, the Danish firm KeTox, and an Irish company. Even though this disaster was unveiled in 2011 by the Korean government, the issue of the victims was neglected for over five years. In 2016, an unexpected but intensive investigation by prosecutors found that Reckitt Benckiser manipulated and concealed animal tests for its own brand and brought several university experts and company employees to court. The matter was an intense social issue in Korea from May to June with a surge in media coverage. The prosecutor's investigation and a nationwide boycott campaign organized by victims and environmental groups against Reckitt Benckiser, whose product had been used by more than 70% of victims, led to the producer's official apology and a compensation scheme. A legislative investigation organized after the April 2016 national election revealed the producers' faults and the government's responsibility, but failed to meet expectations. A special law for the victims passed the National Assembly in January 2017 and a punitive system together with a massive environmental epidemiology investigation are expected to be the only solutions for this tragedy. Sciences of medicine, toxicology and environmental health have provided decisive evidence so far, but for the remaining problems the perspectives of social sciences such as sociology and jurisprudence are highly necessary, similar to with the Minamata disease and Wonjin Rayon events. It may not be easy to follow this issue using unfamiliar terminology from medical and chemical science and the long, complicated history of the event. For these reasons the author has attempted to write this article in a question and answer format to render it easier to follow. The 17 questions are: Q1 What is humidifier disinfectant? Q2 What kind of health problems are caused by humidifier disinfectant? Q3 How many victims are there? Q4 What is the analysis of the 1,112 cases of death? Q5 What is the problem with the government's diagnostic criteria and the solution? Q6 Who made what brands? Q7 Has there been a recall? What is still on sale? Q8 Was safety not checked by any producers? Q9 What are the government's responsibilities? Q10 Is it true that these products were sold only in Korea? Q11 Why and how was it unveiled only in 2011 after 17 years of sales? Q12 What delayed the resolution of the victim issue? Q13 What is the background of the prosecutor's investigation in early 2016? Q14 Is it possible to report new victim cases without evidence of product purchase? Q15 What is happening with the victim issue? Q16 How does it compare with the cases of Minamata disease and Wonjin Rayon? Q17 Are there prevention measures and lessons?