Bleomycin 유도 폐 섬유화에 있어서 성장인자 및 Cytokine의 역할 (Role of Growth Factors and Cytokines on Bleomycin Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis)
-
- Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
- /
- 제44권4호
- /
- pp.871-888
- /
- 1997
연구배경 : 특발성 폐 섬유화확 병인론으로 폐포염과 폐에 침윤한 염증세포 및 폐 조직자체의 실질세포들이 성장인자를 포함한 다양한 cytokine을 분비하여 실질조직을 구성하는 세포에 손상을 야기함으로써 종국에는 섬유화를 초래하는 것으로 이해하고 있다. 그러나 이들에 대한 개괄적인 연구가 부족하고 매개체 각각에 대한 단편적인 논문들뿐이어서 본 연구에서는 BLM유도 폐 손상및 섬유화의 발생기전에 있어서 IL-1, IL-6, TNF-
경상북도에 소재한 3개 종합병원 영상의학과의 MDCT 검사 중 두부, 복부, 흉부 각 10건씩 30건을 대상으로 CTDIl, DLP, Slice 수, DLP/Slice 수를 조사하여 병원 간 프로토콜의 차이로 인한 MDCT의 피폭선량의 차이를 분석하였고, CT검사의 가장 많은 검사건수를 차지하고 프로토콜이 비교적 단순한 두부 CT를 Helical Scan과 Normal Scan으로 2회 실시하여 영상의 화질, CTDI, DLP, 안구의 피폭선량, 갑상선의 피폭선량의 차이를 분석하였다. 두부CT에서 조사대상 병원의 3분의 2에서 CTDI 참조준위(IAEA 50mGy, 우리나라 60mGy)를 초과하지 않은 A병원에 비하여 유의하게 높았다(p<0.001). DLP에서 조사병원의 3분의 1은 참조준위 IAEA 1,050mGy.cm, 우리나라 1,000mGy.cm의 권고량 보다 높았고, 3분의 2가 우리나라의 권고량을 초과하고 있었다. 참조준위를 초과하지 않은 A병원에 비하여 유의하게 높았다(p<0.001). Abdomen CT에서도 3분의 1은 CTDI 참조준위 IAEA 25mGy, 우리나라 20mGy보다 높은 119mGy를 보였고, DLP에서는 모든 조사대상 병원이 우리나라 권고량 700mGy.cm보다 높았다. 조사대상 병원 중 모든 검사에서 높은 선량을 보인 C병원은 MPR, 3D 검사의 비중이 높아 낮은 pitch, 높은 관전류 검사로 인한 피폭선량이 높았다. Scan 방법에 따른 피폭선량의 차이를 분석하고자 동일환자의 두부CT를 Normal scan과 Helical scan으로 각각 실시하여 분석한 결과 CTDI 및 DLP에서 Helical CT가 Normal scan에 비해 63.4%, 93.7% 높은 선량을 보였다(p<0.05, p<0.01). 그러나 갑상선의 피폭선량은 Normal scan이 87.26% 높았다(p<0.01). Helical CT의 선속은 종심부와 변연부의 모양이 종의 형태를 취하고 있어 두부CT에서 갑상선은 중심선속에서 벗어난 적은 선량으로 피폭된다. 또한 Helical scan시 Gantry 각을 수직으로 사용하였고, Normal scan시에는 Orbitomeatal line에 평행으로 정렬된 Gantry 각을 사용하여 Helical scan에서 갑상선은 피폭선량이 감소하였다. 그러나 본 연구에서 사용된 프로토콜은 식약청의 표준준위에 비해 높은 피폭선량을 보여 식약청의 권고량을 지키기 위해서는 낮은 관전류 높은 Pitch의 사용이 요구되었다. 이번 연구에서 Normal scan과 Helical scan에 따른 화질의 차이는 없는 것으로 분석되어 특별한 경우가 아니면 Normal scan의 표준화된 프로토콜을 사용하고 갑상선의 보호장구를 사용하는 것이 필요하였다. 이번 연구는 일지역의 CT검사 중 일부를 조사하여 분석하였으므로 CT검사의 전체를 평가하는데 무리가 있었다. 그러나 경우에 따라 환자피폭선량의 가이드 권고량을 초과하고 있음을 알 수 있었고, 병원 간의 피폭선량 편차도 있음을 확인 할 수 있었다. 이것을 개선하기 위하여 영상의학과 의사 및 방사선사는 CT 방사선량을 줄이는 최적화된 프로토콜로 CT검사를 시행해야 하고, 환자의 알권리를 위하여 피폭선량은 공개되어야 한다. 그러나 아직 많은 의사들과 방사선사는 이에 대한 인식이 부족하므로 개선을 위하여 CT선량 저감화의 교육프로그램, CT검사에 따른 피폭선량의 공개, 병원의 서비스평가 및 병원인증제 평가항목에 CT검사 피폭선량관리 및 공개항목을 추가 등의 관련기관의 노력과 의료종사자가 CT검사에서 행위의 최적화를 실현하는 최선의 프로토콜을 사용하는 노력이 필요하였다.
연구배경 : 급성폐손상의 병태생리학적 기전에는 염증세포들이 분비하는 다양한 염증성 매개물질들이 매우 중요한 역할을 한다. 이중 특히 tumor necrosis factor-
Just before the Korean War, the total number of the North Korean troops was 198,380, while that of the ROK(Republic of Korea) army troops 105,752. That is, the total number of the ROK army troops at that time was 53.3% of the total number of the North Korean army. As of December 2008, the total number of the North Korean troops is estimated to be 1,190,000, while that of the ROK troops is 655,000, so the ROK army maintains 55.04% of the total number of the North Korean troops. If the ROK army continues to reduce its troops according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the total number of its troops will be 517,000 m 2020. If North Korea maintains the current status(l,190,000 troops), the number of the ROK troops will be 43.4% of the North Korean army. In terms of units, just before the Korean War, the number of the ROK army divisions and regiments was 80% and 44.8% of North Korean army. As of December 2008, North Korea maintains 86 divisions and 69 regiments. Compared to the North Korean army, the ROK army maintains 46 Divisions (53.4% of North Korean army) and 15 regiments (21.3% of North Korean army). If the ROK army continue to reduce the military units according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of ROK army divisions will be 28(13 Active Division, 4 Mobilization Divisions and 11 Local Reserve Divisions), while that of the North Korean army will be 86 in 2020. In that case, the number of divisions of the ROK army will be 32.5% of North Korean army. During the Korean war, North Korea suddenly invaded the Republic of Korea and occupied its capital 3 days after the war began. At that time, the ROK army maintained 80% of army divisions, compared to the North Korean army. The lesson to be learned from this is that, if the ROK army is forced to disperse its divisions because of the simultaneous invasion of North Korea and attack of guerrillas in home front areas, the Republic of Korea can be in a serious military danger, even though it maintains 80% of military divisions of North Korea. If the ROK army promotes the plans in [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of military units of the ROK army will be 32.5% of that of the North Korean army. This ratio is 2.4 times lower than that of the time when the Korean war began, and in this case, 90% of total military power should be placed in the DMZ area. If 90% of military power is placed in the DMZ area, few troops will be left for the defense of home front. In addition, if the ROK army continues to reduce the troops, it can allow North Korea to have asymmetrical superiority in military force and it will eventually exert negative influence on the stability and peace of the Korean peninsular. On the other hand, it should be reminded that, during the Korean War, the Republic of Korea was attacked by North Korea, though it kept 53.3% of troops, compared to North Korea. It should also be reminded that, as of 2008, the ROK army is defending its territory with the troops 55.04% of North Korea. Moreover, the national defense is assisted by 25,120 troops of the US Forces in Korea. In case the total number of the ROK troops falls below 43.4% of the North Korean army, it may cause social unrest about the national security and may lead North Korea's misjudgement. Besides, according to Lanchester strategy, the party with weaker military power (60% compared to the party with stronger military power) has the 4.1% of winning possibility. Therefore, if we consider the fact that the total number of the ROK army troops is 55.04% of that of the North Korean army, the winning possibility of the ROK army is not higher than 4.1%. If the total number of ROK troops is reduced to 43.4% of that of North Korea, the winning possibility will be lower and the military operations will be in critically difficult situation. [Military Reform Plan 2020] rums at the reduction of troops and units of the ground forces under the policy of 'select few'. However, the problem is that the financial support to achieve this goal is not secured. Therefore, the promotion of [Military Reform Plan 2020] may cause the weakening of military defence power in 2020. Some advanced countries such as Japan, UK, Germany, and France have promoted the policy of 'select few'. However, what is to be noted is that the national security situation of those countries is much different from that of Korea. With the collapse of the Soviet Unions and European communist countries, the military threat of those European advanced countries has almost disappeared. In addition, the threats those advanced countries are facing are not wars in national level, but terrorism in international level. To cope with the threats like terrorism, large scaled army trops would not be necessary. So those advanced European countries can promote the policy of 'select few'. In line with this, those European countries put their focuses on the development of military sections that deal with non-military operations and protection from unspecified enemies. That is, those countries are promoting the policy of 'select few', because they found that the policy is suitable for their national security environment. Moreover, since they are pursuing common interest under the European Union(EU) and they can form an allied force under NATO, it is natural that they are pursing the 'select few' policy. At present, NATO maintains the larger number of troops(2,446,000) than Russia(l,027,000) to prepare for the potential threat of Russia. The situation of japan is also much different from that of Korea. As a country composed of islands, its prime military focus is put on the maritime defense. Accordingly, the development of ground force is given secondary focus. The japanese government promotes the policy to develop technology-concentrated small size navy and air-forces, instead of maintaining large-scaled ground force. In addition, because of the 'Peace Constitution' that was enacted just after the end of World War II, japan cannot maintain troops more than 240,000. With the limited number of troops (240,000), japan has no choice but to promote the policy of 'select few'. However, the situation of Korea is much different from the situations of those countries. The Republic of Korea is facing the threat of the North Korean Army that aims at keeping a large-scale military force. In addition, the countries surrounding Korea are also super powers containing strong military forces. Therefore, to cope with the actual threat of present and unspecified threat of future, the importance of maintaining a carefully calculated large-scale military force cannot be denied. Furthermore, when considering the fact that Korea is in a peninsular, the Republic of Korea must take it into consideration the tradition of continental countries' to maintain large-scale military powers. Since the Korean War, the ROK army has developed the technology-force combined military system, maintaining proper number of troops and units and pursuing 'select few' policy at the same time. This has been promoted with the consideration of military situation in the Koran peninsular and the cooperation of ROK-US combined forces. This kind of unique military system that cannot be found in other countries can be said to be an insightful one for the preparation for the actual threat of North Korea and the conflicts between continental countries and maritime countries. In addition, this kind of technology-force combined military system has enabled us to keep peace in Korea. Therefore, it would be desirable to maintain this technology-force combined military system until the reunification of the Korean peninsular. Furthermore, it is to be pointed out that blindly following the 'select few' policy of advanced countries is not a good option, because it is ignoring the military strategic situation of the Korean peninsular. If the Republic of Korea pursues the reduction of troops and units radically without consideration of the threat of North Korea and surrounding countries, it could be a significant strategic mistake. In addition, the ROK army should keep an eye on the fact the European advanced countries and Japan that are not facing direct military threats are spending more defense expenditures than Korea. If the ROK army reduces military power without proper alternatives, it would exert a negative effect on the stable economic development of Korea and peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsular. Therefore, the desirable option would be to focus on the development of quality of forces, maintaining proper size and number of troops and units under the technology-force combined military system. The tableau above shows that the advanced countries like the UK, Germany, Italy, and Austria spend more defense expenditure per person than the Republic of Korea, although they do not face actual military threats, and that they keep achieving better economic progress than the countries that spend less defense expenditure. Therefore, it would be necessary to adopt the merits of the defense systems of those advanced countries. As we have examined, it would be desirable to maintain the current size and number of troops and units, to promote 'select few' policy with increased defense expenditure, and to strengthen the technology-force combined military system. On the basis of firm national security, the Republic of Korea can develop efficient policies for reunification and prosperity, and jump into the status of advanced countries. Therefore, the plans to reduce troops and units in [Military Reform Plan 2020] should be reexamined. If it is difficult for the ROK army to maintain its size of 655,000 troops because of low birth rate, the plans to establish the prompt mobilization force or to adopt drafting system should be considered for the maintenance of proper number of troops and units. From now on, the Republic of Korean government should develop plans to keep peace as well as to prepare unexpected changes in the Korean peninsular. For the achievement of these missions, some options can be considered. The first one is to maintain the same size of military troops and units as North Korea. The second one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea in terms of military force index. The third one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea, with the combination of the prompt mobilization force and the troops in active service under the system of technology-force combined military system. At present, it would be not possible for the ROK army to maintain such a large-size military force as North Korea (1,190,000 troops and 86 units). So it would be rational to maintain almost the same level of military force as North Korea with the combination of the troops on the active list and the prompt mobilization forces. In other words, with the combination of the troops in active service (60%) and the prompt mobilization force (40%), the ROK army should develop the strategies to harmonize technology and forces. The Korean government should also be prepared for the strategic flexibility of USFK, the possibility of American policy change about the location of foreign army, radical unexpected changes in North Korea, the emergence of potential threat, surrounding countries' demand for Korean force for the maintenance of regional stability, and demand for international cooperation against terrorism. For this, it is necessary to develop new approaches toward the proper number and size of troops and units. For instance, to prepare for radical unexpected political or military changes in North Korea, the Republic of Korea should have plans to protect a large number of refugees, to control arms and people, to maintain social security, and to keep orders in North Korea. From the experiences of other countries, it is estimated that 115,000 to 230,000 troops, plus ten thousands of police are required to stabilize the North Korean society, in the case radical unexpected military or political change happens in North Korea. In addition, if the Republic of Korea should perform the release of hostages, control of mass destruction weapons, and suppress the internal wars in North Korea, it should send 460,000 troops to North Korea. Moreover, if the Republic of Korea wants to stop the attack of North Korea and flow of refugees in DMZ area, at least 600,000 troops would be required. In sum, even if the ROK army maintains 600,000 troops, it may need additional 460,000 troops to prepare for unexpected radical changes in North Korea. For this, it is necessary to establish the prompt mobilization force whose size and number are almost the same as the troops in active service. In case the ROK army keeps 650,000 troops, the proper number of the prompt mobilization force would be 460,000 to 500,000.