• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제28권9호
• /
• pp.783-790
• /
• 2004

For a nearly decade Busan has been the pre-dominant force in Northeast Asian port community, but during the last couple of years, several competitors have looked to directly challenge Busan's regional dominance, most notably, northern Chinese ports. Faced with this challenging and formidable trend, Busan has had to respond appropriately to ensure that Busan remains a regional hub well into the 21st century. The aim of this paper is to make some considerations for a regional hub container port in Northeast Asia in response to changes in the shipping industry with particular reference to Korea.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.1-31
• /
• 2005

Major companies in USA, Europe and Japan as well as even China and Russia put more overseas investment in Asian regions than before, while northeast Asian regional trade gets more attractive and important under the influence of China's super-speed economic growth. Possibly, it is expected that such ever-increasing gravity of regional trade will help spotlight the importance of local trade route considerably. In particular, northeast Asian region's economic briskness and step-up in international economic partnerships will expectedly contribute to much boosting up the quantity of goods transported via local coasting route. Thus, it is advisable that both Busan New port specialize in dealing with freights via East Sea rim, while Gwangyang port specialize in dealing with freights via Yellow Sea rim. Furthermore, it is required that both ports share some of their own roles as hub port and hub & spoke port respectively, so that both of them can be devoted to stepping up into northeast Asian hub ports.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.11-26
• /
• 1999

The subject of port efficiency is one of the important issues facing port authorities and policy makers today. A number of studies have been undertaken which compare ports in terms of their efficiency. But any port comparison can only be valid and meaningful if a port’s efficiency is compared with a similar port. The main objective of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to identifying similar ports based on the technique of principal component analysis and cluster analysis. And it seeks to identify the most important factors underlying the port classification. Lack of awareness of which factors differentiate ports has resulted in an unnecessary collection of data which are of limited use in port classification. This paper has identified five groupings of similar ports within which port comparision can be justifiably made. This approach can be used for any future port comparision.

• 한국항만경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항만경제학회 2007년도 정책세미나 및 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.37-50
• /
• 2007

Taking advantage of geographical position of Korea located on the main route of world-wide service, Port Logistics Industry can be strategic industry which secures international competitiveness necessary for Korea to be hub of Northeast Asian's logistics. Along with the advent of super large container vessel, world ports environment changed from "milkway" type, which means vessel calls every port for service to "Hub & Spoke" type, which means vessel calls regional central port and feeder service for the rest ports. As environment changes, regional ports in Northeast Asia are competing each other tougher and tougher and introducing or developing port logistics information system based on state-of-the-art technology in order to adapt themselves to new environment, thus to be Hub port. Taking this situation into consideration, we want to define clearly the meaning and scope of port logistics IT and review the global trend of port logistics IT. Finally we want to find future development of port logistics IT which we have to achieve.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.73-91
• /
• 2005

The goal of the project on developing Korea as the logistics hub of Northeast Asia is to develop Busan Port and Gwangyang Port as international logistics centers by promoting and attracting more warehouses. As is well known, there is intense competition among ports located in major economic blocs to become the regional logistics hub. Gwangyang is second to none in terms of being favorably located at the center of Northeast Asia. Gwangyang Port, however, lacked in SOC construction and faced the poor government support politics hub of Northeast Asia. They are i) expanding the logistics infrastructuressuch as expressway and railroads between Yeosu Airport and Gwangyang Port, ii) Setting up new port hinterland and industrial complex in the vicinity of Gwangyang Port iii) securing high value-added fixed cargo traffic, and iv) improving laws and institutions.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.111-126
• /
• 2004

Many countries in the North East Asia are competing with each other in order to become a centre of international logistics activities. The competition to become a hub port in Far East region is now fierce. The anticipated investments on improving port facilities and attracting the mega carriers are immense for all the ports in the region and the extent of the effort could cripple the local ports and region's economy given the limited financial resources. It is, however, impossible to avoid the disastrous possibility that the massive investments could be channeled into the port, which will never become a hub port, as no port is ready to currently admit defeat and settle as a small regional port. In an attempt to minimise such disastrous waste of resources, ports need to verify the eligibility of their own. This paper tests a system dynamics model using the Port of Busan to understand and illustrate the principle guideline of investment decision making for ports.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.153-172
• /
• 2004

With swelling of Chinese Economic scale, the competitive environment is swinging over the north-east Asia countries, Korea, Japan, China, and Taiwan. As the result of this circumstance, each countries in this area has been reformed their industries. According to the expanding in ocean logistic. The trends of competition on Hub port is looking forward much more severe year after year to preoccupy in logistics competitive within this Area. On the other hand, considering competitive environment & swelling of Chinese Economic scale, the structural reforms are imperative in korea. Korea have to convert the traditional sects into new high added value sects. In these trends, provincial government also should look for the plan for reinforcement of Regional competitiveness. The focus of this study is to look for the reinforcement methods on regional competitiveness of Gyeongnam Provincial Government. First, competitive industries in Gyeongnam, and second, Masan Free Trade Zone will be surveyed from data. Finally, the effects of New Hub port developing in Pusan-Jinhae will be discussed.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.271-292
• /
• 2009

1990년대 이후 세계경제흐름의 한 가지 특징으로 개방화 및 지역경제통합의 확대를 꼽을 수 있다. 이로 인해 세계경제권은 유럽연합(EU)을 중심으로 하는 유럽경제권, 미국을 중심으로 하는 아메리카 경제권, 그리고 최근에 급부상하고 있는 중국을 중심으로한 동북아 경제권이라는 삼극체제로 재편되고 있다. 이러한 세계경제의 조류와 동북아의 현실 그리고 사상 최대의 항만개발 프로젝트를 수행하고 있는 중국과 자국항만의 경쟁력 회복을 위해 획기적인 항만정책을 도입하고 있는 일본의 움직임 상황을 감안할 때 우리나라도 이에 대한 선도적, 능동적 대책마련이 절실하고 시급한 과제라고 사료된다. 본 연구는 문헌연구의 방법을 통해서 먼저 Hub-Port의 개념과 조건을 제시하고, 동북아 경쟁국의 Hub-Port 발전전략을 논술하며, 이를 위해서 부산항과 일본의 혼슈(시모노세키항)와 규수(키타규수항) 사이에 위치하는 한 일해협경제권의 발전 잠재력과 전략적 협력을 통한 한 일 공동 발전을 모색하는 것이 본고의 목적이다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.171-178
• /
• 2003

세계적으로 항만간 경쟁이 전방위로 전개되고 있는 가운데 우리나라를 비롯하여 아시아 각국은 자국 항만을 중심항만으로 육성하려고 대대적인 항만개발에 나서고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 아직까지 중심항 개발전략의 유효성에 대한 이론적 검토는 충분하지 못한 실정이다. 본 연구는 i) 대형항만에 물동량이 집중되는 항만집중화 현상이 일어나는가 ii) 과연 대형항만은 소형항만에 비해 물동량 증가속도가 빠른가를 검토함으로써 중심항만 개발전략에 대한 시사점을 도출해 보고자 한다. 이를 위해 먼저 허쉬만-허핀달지수를 적용하여 아시아 항만의 항만집중도를 분석하였고, 또한 글로벌 차원과 지역적 차원에서 컨테이너 항만규모와 성장간 실증분석을 시도하였다. 분석 결과, 항만집중도에 있어서 아시아 특히 동북아지역은 항만물동량의 분산화 경향이 강한 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 항만규모와 성장간 관계의 경우 글로벌 차원에서는 대형항만일수록 물동랑 증가율이 소형항만에 비해 높게 나타난 반면, 아시아지역은 소형항만일수록 물동량 증가율이 높게 나타났다.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2003년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2003

세계적으로 항만간 경쟁이 전방위로 전개되고 있는 가운데 우리나라를 비롯하여 아시아 각국은 자국 항만을 중심항만으로 육성하려고 대대적인 항만개발에 나서고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 아직까지 중심항 개발전략의 유효성에 대한 이론적 검토는 충분하지 못한 실정이다. 본 연구는 i) 대형항만에 물동량이 집중되는 항만집중화 현상이 일어나는가 ii) 과연 대형항만은 소형항만에 비해 물동량 증가속도가 빠른가를 검토함으로써 중심항만 개발전략에 대한 시사점을 도출해 보고자 한다 이를 위해 먼저 허쉬만-허핀달지수론 적용하여 아시아 항만의 항만집중도론 분석하였고, 또한 글로벌 차원과 지역적 차원에서 컨테이너 항만규모와 성장간 실증분석을 시도하였다. 분석 결과, 항만집중도에 있어서 아시아 특히 동북아지역은 항만물동량의 분산화 경향이 강한 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 항만규모와 성장간 관계의 경우 글로벌 차원에서는 대형항만일수록 물동량 증가율이 소형항만에 비해 높게 나타난 반면, 아시아지역은 소형항만일수록 물동량 증가율이 높게 나타났다.