인구통계특성 기반 디지털 마케팅을 위한 클릭스트림 빅데이터 마이닝 (Clickstream Big Data Mining for Demographics based Digital Marketing)
-
- 지능정보연구
- /
- 제22권3호
- /
- pp.143-163
- /
- 2016
인구통계학적 정보는 디지털 마케팅의 핵심이라 할 수 있는 인터넷 사용자에 대한 타겟 마케팅 및 개인화된 광고를 위해 고려되는 가장 기초적이고 중요한 정보이다. 하지만 인터넷 사용자의 온라인 활동은 익명으로 행해지는 경우가 많기 때문에 인구통계특성 정보를 수집하는 것은 쉬운 일이 아니다. 정기적인 설문 조사를 통해 사용자들의 인구통계특성 정보를 수집할 수도 있지만 많은 비용이 들며 허위 기재 등과 같은 위험성이 존재한다. 특히, 모바일 환경에서는 대부분의 사용자들이 익명으로 활동하기 때문에 인구통계특성 정보를 수집하는 것은 더욱 더 어려워지고 있다. 반면, 인터넷 사용자의 온라인 활동을 기록한 클릭스트림 데이터는 해당 사용자의 인구통계학적 정보에 활용될 수 있다. 특히, 인터넷 사용자의 온라인 행위 특성 중 하나인 페이지뷰는 인구통계학적 정보 예측에 있어서 중요한 요인이 된다. 본 연구에서는 기존 선행 연구를 토대로 클릭스트림 데이터 분석을 통해 인터넷 사용자의 온라인 행위 특성을 추출하고 이를 해당 사용자의 인구통계학적 정보 예측에 사용한다. 또한, 1)의사결정나무를 이용한 변수 축소, 2)주성분분석을 활용한 차원축소, 3)군집분석을 활용한 변수축소의 방법을 제안하고 실험에 적용함으로써 많은 설명변수를 이용하여 예측 모델 생성 시 발생하는 차원의 저주와 과적합 문제를 해결하고 예측 모델의 정확도를 높이고자 하였다. 실험 결과, 범주의 수가 많은 다분형 종속변수에 대한 예측 모델은 모든 설명변수를 사용하여 예측 모델을 생성했을 때보다 본 연구에서 제안한 방법론들을 적용했을 때 예측 모델에 대한 정확도가 향상됨을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 클릭스트림 분석을 통해 추출된 인터넷 사용자의 온라인 행위는 해당 사용자의 인구통계학적 정보 예측에 활용 가능하며, 예측된 익명의 인터넷 사용자들에 대한 인구통계학적 정보를 디지털 마케팅에 활용 할 수 있다는데 의의가 있다. 또한, 제안 방법론들을 통해 어느 종속변수에 대해 어떤 방법론들이 예측 모델의 정확도를 개선하는지 확인하였다. 이는 추후 클릭스트림 분석을 활용하여 인구통계학적 정보를 예측할 때, 본 연구에서 제안한 방법론을 사용하여 보다 높은 정확도를 가지는 예측 모델을 생성 할 수 있다는데 의의가 있다.
연구배경 : 효율적인 결핵관리체계를 위해, 보건복지부는 2000년 6월 1일부터 결핵정보관리보고서에 의한 새로운 국가결핵감시체계를 출범시키게 되었다. 보건소의 결핵환자에 대한 결핵감시체계는 이미 1962년부터 운영 중에 있었으므로 이번의 감시체계는 민간의료부문의 결핵 환자들을 비로소 국가결핵감시체계에 포함시켰다는데 의미가 있다. 의사들의 일상적인 신고에 의한 결핵규모의 정확한 파악을 위해서는, 결핵정보관리보고서의 정확한 작성과 성실한 신고가 필수조건이다. 본 연구는 서울소재 한 민간종합병원에서 관할보건소로 신고된 결핵정보관리보고서가 얼마나 정확하게 기재되어 있으며 향후 개선할 점이 없는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 방 법 : 2000년 8월 1일부터 2001년 1월 31일까지 6개월간 삼성서울병원에서 관할보건소로 신고된 291명의 성인 폐결핵 환자들을 대상으로 하였다. 결핵정보관리보고서 항목인 인적사항, 과거 치료력, 검사결과, 질병코드 및 환자치료 사항을, 의무기록 및 병원 전산화 시스템의 컴퓨터에 저장되어 있는 검사 기록들과 비교하여 얼마나 정확한가를 알아보았다. 결 과 : 291명의 성인 결핵 환자는 폐결핵 222명, 폐외 결핵이 69명이었다. 성별은 남자 164명(56%), 여자가 127명(44%)였으며, 평균연령은 46세였다. 직업이 미기재된 경우가 132명(45%)이었다. 결핵과거 치료력은 83%, 치료기간은 93%, 과거 결핵치료 받은 횟수는 83%에서 보고서와 의무기록간에 일치하였다. 폐결핵 환자 222명 중 객담도말검사는 보고서의 76%가 의무기록과 일치하였으나 배양검사는 23%만이 실제 검사기록과 일치하였다. 객담배양 미검 표기 198명 중, 실제 객담 배양 미검은 43명(21.7%)이었다. 폐외 결핵환자 진단에 이용되었던 객담이외의 검체 도말검사는 54%, 배양 검사48%, 조직검사는 68%, 그리고, PCR 등의 기타검사는 67%에서 실제 검사결과와 일치하였다. 질병코드는 A15에서 A19의 3단계 분류를 적용했을 때는 85%, A15.0에서 A19.9의 4단계 분류에서는 66%가 의무기록과 일치하였다. 환자구분에서 신환으로 보고된 246명 중 실제 신환이었던 경우는 217명(88%)였으며, 나머지는 재발 13명, 치료실패자 2명, 중단 후 재등록 1명, 전입 12명 및 기타 1명으로 판명되었다. 재발로 신고된 23명 중 실제 재발은 18명(78%)으로 보고서 내용과 실제 의무기록 간에 조금씩 차이가 있었다. 치료시작 또는 진단일자는 264명(91%)이 일치하였으며, 보고서에는 HREZ 처방이 204명이었지만, 의무기록에는 HREZ 처방이 172명(84.3%)이었으며, 나머지는 HRE 9명(4.4%), 기타 처방 21명(10.3%)이었으며, HRE 처방으로 보고된 34명 중 실제 HRE 처방은 19명(55.9%)이었다. 결 론 : 우리나라의 효율적인 결핵관리를 위해서는 민간의료기관에서 작성되는 결핵정보관리보고서의 정확한 기재와 성실한 작성이 중요하며, 결핵과거치료력, 객담 배양 검사 항목 등의 보완과 민간부문 결핵환자들에 추후 관리하는 제도마련도 고안되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.
In china, six bibliographies of offical historical books are evaluated at the most important things among the systematically-editing bibliographies. These bibliographies would be usful to study the orign of classical sciences and their development, bibliographic research of Chinese classics, bibliographic judgement on genuine books, titles, authors, volumes. They could be refered to research into graving, correcting, and existence of ancient books. therefore, these bibliographies would be applied to estimation the phase of scientific and cultural development. The study of these bibliographies has been not yet made in Korea. This thesis lays its importance on the background of their appearance, their classification norms, organizing system of their catalogue, and comparison between their difference. 1. Editing and compiling of Chilyak (칠약) by Liu Chin (유흠) and official histories played an important role of entering an apperance of historical book's bibliographies. Chilyak has been lost. However, its classification and compiling system of classical books would be traced by Hansoyemunji(한서예문지) of which basic system is similar to Chilyak. It classified books according to their scientific characteristic. If a few books didn't have their own categories, they were combined by the circles parallel to the books' characteristic. With the books classified under the same scientific characteristic, they were again divided into the scientific schools or structures. It also arranged the same kinds of books according to the chronology. The some books wi th duplicate subjects were classified multiplely by their duplicate subject. 2. Ssu-ma Chon's (사마천) The Historical Records (Saki, 사기) and Pan Ku's (반고) The History of the Former Han Dynasty (Hanso, 한서) has also took effects on appearance of historical books' bibliographies. Covering overall history, Saki was structured by the five parts: The basic annals(본기), the chronological tables (표), the documents (서), the hereditary houses (세가), biographies (열전). The basic annals dealt with kings and courts' affairs according to the chronology. The chronological tables was the records of the annals. The documents described overall the social and cultural systems. The hereditary houses recorded courts' meritorious officials and public figures. The biographies showed exemplars of seventy peoples selected by their social status. Pan Ku(반구)'s The History of the Former Han Dynasty(한서) deserved to be called the prototype for the offical histories after Saki's (사기; The Historical Records) apperance. Although it modelled on Saki, it had set up its own cataloguing system. It was organized by four parts; the basic annals (본기), the chronological tables (표), treatises(지), biographies (열전). The documents in the Hanso(한서) was converted into treatises(지). The hereditary houses and biographies were merged. For the first time, the treatise with The Yemunji could operate function for historical bibliographies. 3. There were six historical bibliographies: Hansoyemunji(한서예문지), Susokyongjeokji (수서경적지), Kudangsokyongjeokji(구당서경적지), Shindangsoyemunji (신당서예문지), Songsayemunji (송사예문지), Myongsayemunji (명사예문지). 1) Modelling on Liu Chin's Chilyak except Chipryak(집략), Hansoyemunji divided the characteristic of the books and documents into six parts: Yukrye(육예), Cheja(제자), Shibu(시부), Pyongsoh(병서), Susul(수술), Pangki(방기). Under six parts, there were thirty eight orders in Hansoyemunji. To its own classification, Hansoyemunji applied the Chilyak's theory of classification that the books or documents were managed according to characteristic of sciences, the difference of schools, the organization of sentences. However the overlapped subjects were deleted and unified into one. The books included into an unsuitable subject were corrected and converted into another. The Hansoyemunji consisted of main preface (Taesoh 대서), minor preface (Sosoh 소서) , the general preface (Chongso 총서). It also recorded the introduction of books and documents, the origin of sciences, the outline of subjects, and the establishment of orders. The books classified by the subject had title, author, and volumes. They were rearranged by titles and the chronological publication year. Sometimes author was the first access point to catalogue the books. If it was necessary for the books to take footnotes, detail notes were formed. The Volume number written consecutively to order and subject could clarify the quantity of books. 2) Refering to Classfication System by Seven Norms (칠분법) and Classification System by Four Norms(사분법), Susokyongjeokji(수서경적지) had accomplished the classification by four norms. In fact, its classification largely imitated Wanhyosoh(완효서)'s Chilrok(칠록), Susokyongjeokji's system of classification consisted of four parts-Kyung(경), Sa(사), Cha(자), Chip(칩). The four parts were divided into 40 orders. Its appendix was again divided into two parts, Buddihism and Taiosm. Under the two parts there were fifteen orders. Totally Susokyongjeokji was made of six parts and fifty five orders. In comparison with Hansoyemunji(한서예문지), it clearly showed the conception of Kyung, Sa, Cha, Chip. Especially it deserved to be paid attention that Hansoyemunji laied history off Chunchu(춘추) and removed history to Sabu(사부). However Chabu(사부) put many contrary subjects such as Cheja(제자), Kiye(기예), Sulsu(술수), Sosol(소설) into the same boundary, which committed errors insufficient theoretical basis. Anothor demerit of Susokyongjeokji was that it dealt with Taiosm scriptures and Buddism scriptures at the appendix because they were considered as quasi-religion. Its compilation of bibliographical facts consisted of main preface(Taesoh 대서), minor preface(Sosoh 소서), general preface (Chongsoh 총서), postscript (Husoh 후서). Its bibliological facts mainly focused on the titles. Its recorded authors' birth date and their position. It wrote the lost and existence of books consecutive to total number of books, which revealed total of the lost books in Su Dynasty. 3) Modelling on the basis of Kokumsorok(고분서록) and Naewaekyongrok(내외경록), Kudangsokyongjeokji(구당서경적지) had four parts and fourty five orders. It was estimated as the important role of establishing basic frame of classification by four norms in classification theory's history. However it had also its own limit. Editing and compling orders of Kudangsokyongjeokji had been not progressively changed. Its orders imitated by and large Susokyongjeokji. In Its system of organizing catalogue, with its minor preface and general preface deleting, Kudangsokyongjeokji by titles after orders sometimes broke out confusion because of unclear boundaries between orders. 4) Shindangsoyemunji(신당서예문지), adding 28,469 books to Kudangsokyongjeokji, recorded 82,384 books which were divided by four parts and fourty four orders. In comparison with Kudangkyongjeokj, Sindangsoyemunji corrected unclear order's norm. It merged the analogical norms four orders (for instance, Kohun 고훈 and Sohakryu 소학류) and seperated the different norms four orders (for example, Hyokyong 효경 and Noneuhryu 논어류, Chamwi 참위 and Kyonghaeryu 경해류, Pyonryon 편년 and Wisaryu 위사류). Recording kings' behaviors and speeches (Kikochuryu 기거주류) in the historical parts induced the concept of specfication category. For the first time, part of Chipbu (집부) set up the order of classification norm for historical and literatural books and documents (Munsaryu 문사류). Its editing and compiling had been more simplified than Kudangsokyongjeokji. Introduction was written at first part of bibliographies. Appendants except bibliographic items such subject, author, title, volume number, total were omitted. 5) Songsayemunji(송사예문지) were edited in the basis of combining Puksong(북송) and Namsong(남송), depending on Sabukuksayemunji(사부국사예문지). Generally Songsayemunji had lost a lot of bibliographical facts of many books. They were duplicated and wrongly classified books because it committed an error of the incorrectly annalistic editing. Particularly Namsong showed more open these defaults. Songsayemunji didin't include the books published since the king Youngchong(영종). Its system of classification was more better controlled. Chamwiryu(참위류) in the part of Kyongbu(경부) was omitted. In the part of history(Sabu 사부), recordings of kings' behaviors and speeches more merged in the annals. Historical abstract documents (Sachoryu 사초류) were seperately arranged. In the part of Chabu(자부), Myongdangkyongmaekryu(명당경맥류) and Euisulryu(의술류) were combined. Ohangryu(오행류) were laied off Shikuryu(시구류). In the part of Chipbu(집부), historical and literatural books (Munsaryu 문사류) were independentely arranged. There were the renamed orders; from Wisa(위사) to Paesa(패사), Chapsa (잡사) to Pyolsa(열사), Chapchonki(잡전기) to Chonki(전기), Ryusoh(류서) to Ryusa(류서). Introduction had only main preface. The books of each subject catalogued by title, the volume number, and author and arranged mainly by authors. Annotations were written consecutively after title and the volume number. In the afternote the number of not-treated books were revealed. Difference from Singdangsohyemunji(신당서예문지) were that the concept and boundary of orders became more clearer. It also wrote the number of books consecutive to main subject. 6) Modelling on Chonkyongdangsomok (경당서목), Myongsayemunji(명사예문지) was compiled in the basis of books and documents published in the Ming Danasty. In classification system, Myongsayemunji partly merged and the seperated some orders for it. It also deleted and renamed some of orders. In case of necessity, combining of orders' norm was occured particulary in the part of Sabu(사부) and Chabu(자부). Therefore these merging of orders norm didn't offer sufficient theretical background. For example, such demerits were seen in the case that historical books edited by annals were combined with offical historical ones which were differently compiled and edited from the former. In the part of Chabu(자부), it broke out another confusion that Pubga(법가), Meongga(명가), Mukga(묵가), Chonghweongka's(종횡가) thoughts were classified in the Chapka(잡가). Scriptures of Taiosim and Buddhism were seperated from each other. There were some deleted books such as Mokrokryu(목록류), Paesaryu(패사류) in the part of history (Sabu 사부) and Chosaryu(초사류) in the part of Chipbu(집부). The some in the each orders had been renamed. Imitating compiling system of Songsayemunji(송사예문지), with reffering to its differ-ence, Myongsayemunji(명사예문지) wrote the review and the change of the books by author. The number of not-treated books didn't appear at the total. It also deleted the total following main subject.