• Title/Summary/Keyword: rahmen-type temporary bridge

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Performance Evaluation of Rahman-type Movable Joint System for Temporary Bridge (단부 수평가동-수직구속 부재를 적용한 라멘형 가설교량의 거동평가)

  • Kim, Sang Hyo;Joung, Jung Yeun;Heo, Won Ho;Jung, Chi Young
    • Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-13
    • /
    • 2013
  • Most rahmen-type temporary bridges are constructed with limited bridge length to prevent excessive horizontal forces due to the thermal expansion of main girder. To achieve a long length temporary bridge several independent bridges are required and they can not share the bents, at the rahmen-type ends, with the adjacent ones. The additional bents require more cost and reduce the section space under bridges. In order to remove extra bents with keeping the rahmen effect at the bridge ends, this study proposes a new rahmen-type movable joint system for temporary bridges.

Thermal Behavior and Structral Efficiency of Rahmen with Sliding-Girder (슬라이딩 거더를 가진 라멘의 온도거동과 구조효율)

  • Jeong, Dal-Yeong;Jeong, Chang-Hyun;Yhim, Sung-Soon
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-7
    • /
    • 2020
  • Although the temperature load is an important load among the various loads affecting the behaviors of general rahmen-type temporary bridges (GRTB), no study of the thermal load has been carried out. In the case of GRTB, horizontal displacement should be free, and the generated internal force should be minimized to reduce stress due to a temperature load. Sliding girder type bridge (SGTB) allows the axial deformation due to thermal load, and decreases the axial stress and delivers bending stress. This study examined the temperature behavior of an SGTB. Structural analysis was carried out for four types of spans (eq, 10, 20, 30, and 40m) and three types of pier heights (eq, 2, 4, and 6m) along with the GRTB. The applied loads were a fixed vertical load and an axial temperature load. The friction coefficient was 0.4, which is a representative value of a steel girder. Consequently, the stress of the SGTB increased with increasing span length, regardless of the temperature load. The stress of the GRTB increased with increasing temperature and span length. Compared to the GRTB, the stress of the SGTB decreased by 20% to 50% at the center of the girder and by 50% to 90% at the bottom of the pier. This could secure the structural efficiency compared to the GRTB with the same specifications.