• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.14-23
• /
• 2021

Background: For radiological protection and control, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) provides the nominal risk coefficients related to radiation exposure, which can be extrapolated using the excess relative risk and excess absolute risk obtained from the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki with the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF). Materials and Methods: Since it is impossible to directly estimate the radiation risk at doses less than approximately 100 mSv only from epidemiological knowledge and data, support from radiation biology is absolutely imperative, and thus, several national and international bodies have advocated the importance of bridging knowledge between biology and epidemiology. Because of the accident at the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)'s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in 2011, the exposure of the public to radiation has become a major concern and it was considered that the estimation of radiation risk should be more realistic to cope with the prevailing radiation exposure situation. Results and Discussion: To discuss the issues from wide aspects related to radiological protection, and to realize bridging knowledge between biology and epidemiology, we have established a research group to develop low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation risk estimation methodology, with the permission of the Japan Health Physics Society. Conclusion: The aim of the research group was to clarify the current situation and issues related to the risk estimation of low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation exposure from the viewpoints of different research fields, such as epidemiology, biology, modeling, and dosimetry, to identify a future strategy and roadmap to elucidate a more realistic estimation of risk against low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation exposure.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.189-195
• /
• 2017

방사선 특히, 엑스선 또는 감마선으로부터 인체를 보호하기 위해 납(Pb)으로 된 보호 장구를 광범위하게 사용해왔다. 최근 납 중독 및 환경오염의 문제로 납을 대신하는 무연 방사선 차폐재의 개발이 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 차폐재의 성능 확보를 위해서는 제작 및 평가의 순환 사이클을 반복하게 된다. 본 연구는 실제 무연 방사선 차폐소재의 제작에 앞서 차폐재의 성능을 몬테카를로 전산모사를 통해 확인함으로써 가능한 차폐소재의 조합을 연구하였다. 방사선 차폐소재의 평가에 사용되는 조건으로 엑스선관을 Geant4를 이용하여 전산모사하고 획득된 광자 스펙트럼을 이용하여 텅스텐과 비스무스의 조합에 따른 차폐소재의 성능을 평가하였다. 차폐소재의 공극에 따른 성능 저하도 평가하였다. 방사선 차폐 소재 개발 시 공극률을 줄이는 것이 중요한 인자라는 것을 알 수 있었다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.11-25
• /
• 1980

The increasing utilization of radioactive isotopes in industry, medicine and research has raised the question, 'How should hospitals deal with radiation injuries when they occur?' A system for initial management of radiation injuries has been developed by Radiation Management Corporation. Radiation injuries are classified and a treatment plan outlined for each at the emergency and short term medical care phase. This system includes clinical prognosis as well as a detailed plan for quick set up or a Radiation Emergency Area in any hospital. Procedures for patient admission, preparation of the facility, general decontamination, sample taking, and wound decontamination are included.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 1976

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2013년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.1023-1026
• /
• 2013

위 펄스형 방사선에 노출된 전자장비는 전자소자 내부에서 발생되는 전자-정공쌍(EHP)과 이들이 형성한 순간 광전류로 Upset, Latchup, Burn out 과 같은 다양한 피해를 입게 된다. 이와같은 손상은 군무기체계나 우주항공 장비의 경우 군전력 손실이나 장비의 기능정지로 나타나 국가적으로 큰 손실을 초래할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 펄스형 감마방사선으로 부터 전자장비/소자를 보호하기 위한 방호기술개발의 일환으로 '방사선 감지 및 제어장치'를 구현하고 대표적으로 군장비에 사용되는 전자소자에 대한 기능검증을 시도하였다. 펄스 방사선에 Latchup 및 Burn out 손상특성을 나타내는 LM118 소자에 개발한 '방사선 감지 및 제어장치'를 적용하여 펄스방사선 조사시험을 수행한 결과 LM118이 안전하게 보호됨을 확인하였다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.66-70
• /
• 1989

방사성 중성자선원은 일상적 시험에 있어 표준 중성자 방사선장을 형성하는데 적합하다. 방사선 방어상의 목적으로 사용되는 중성자 측정기기의 교정을 위한 기준 방사선이 ISO TC-85에서 제의되었다. 한국표준연구소 방사선연구실에는 ISO TC-85의 추천사항에 준하여 개인용 중성자 선량계를 교정하기 위하여 $^{252}Cf$와 $^{241}Am-Be$ 선원을 이용한 표준조사시설을 설립하였다. 본 연구에서는 중성자 산란과 선원 비등방성에 연관된 교정상의 보정인자들을 실험에 의하여 결정하였다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.152-161
• /
• 1986

외부방사선피폭(外部放射線被曝)으로 인한 위험(危險)의 평가(評價)와 관련된 량(量) 및 개념(槪念)의 동향(動向)과 미해결(未解決)된 문제점(問題點)들에 대하여 살펴보았다. 특히 ICRU 39의 실용량(實用量)에 근거(根據)한 선량환산인자(線量換算因子), 선질계수(線質係數)의 재정의(再定義), 성별(性別)에 따른 위험(危險)의 차이(差異) 그리고 기타조직(其他組織)의 선정문제등(選定問題等)에 대하여 구체적(具體的)으로 논(論)하였다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.177-180
• /
• 2012

Industrial radiography practice is usually employed in public domain. Over the years there are several radiation accidents reported in this practice. The accidents often result in severe or fatal exposures to occupational workers and public. The number of radiation accidents is also significant when compared with other industrial accidents. This paper describes practice specific training as one of the measures to the improve radiation safety and reduce the accidents. The efforts by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to disseminate information and to improve the radiation safety status in industrial radiography are also discussed.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.69-89
• /
• 2006

Biological mechanisms for ionizing radiation effects are different at low doses than at high doses. Radiation hormesis involves low-dose-induced protection and high-dose-induced harm. The protective component is associated with a reduction in the incidence of cancer below the spontaneous frequency, brought about by activation of defensive and repair processes. The Linear No-Threshold (LNT) hypothesis advocated by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the Biological Effects of ionizing Radiation (BEIR) Report VII for cancer risk estimations Ignores hormesis and the presence of a threshold. Cancer incidences significantly less than expected have been found in a large number of epidemiological studies including, airline flight personnel, inhabitants of high radiation backgrounds, shipyard workers, nuclear site workers in scores of locations throughout the world, nuclear power utility workers, plutonium workers, military nuclear test site Participants, Japanese A-bomb survivors, residents contaminated by major nuclear accidents, residents of Taiwan living in $^{60}Co$ contaminated buildings, fluoroscopy and mammography patients, radium dial painters, and those exposed to indoor radon. Significantly increased cancer was not found at doses <200 $mSv^*$. Evidence for radiation hormesis was seen in both sexes for acute or chronic exposures, low or high LET radiations, external whole- or partial body exposures, and for internal radionuclides. The ubiquitous nature of the Healthy Worker Effect (HWE)-like responses in cellular, animal and epidemiological studies negates the HWE as an explanation for radiation hormesis. The LNT hypothesis is wrong and does not represent the true nature of the dose-response relationship, since low doses or dose-rates commonly result in thresholds and reduce cancer incidences below the spontaneous rate. Radiation protection organizations should seriously consider the cost and health implications of radiation hormesis.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.162-166
• /
• 2023

Background: Assessment of the radiation doses to which workers are exposed can differ depending on the placement of dosimeters on the body. In addition, it is affected by whether the placement is under or over a shielding apron. This study aimed to evaluate the actual positioning of personal dosimeters on the body, with or without shielding aprons, among radiation workers in Korea. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the survey data, which included demographic characteristics, such as sex, age, occupation, work history, and placement of the personal dosimeter being worn, from a cohort study of Korean radiation workers. We assessed the use of personal dosimeters among workers, stratified by sex, age, working period, starting year of work, and occupation. Results and Discussion: Overall, high compliance (89.1% to 99.0%) with the wearing of dosimeters on the chest was observed regardless of workers' characteristics, such as age, sex, occupation, and work history. However, the placement of dosimeters, either under or over the shielding aprons, was inconsistent. Overall, 40.1% of workers wore dosimeters under their aprons, while the others wore dosimeters over their aprons. This inconsistency indicates that radiation doses are possibly measured differently under the same exposure conditions solely owing to variations in the placement of worn dosimeters. Conclusion: Although a lack of uniformity in dosimeter placement when wearing a shielding apron may not cause serious harm in radiation dose management for workers, the development of detailed guidelines for dosimeter placement may improve the accuracy of dose assessment.