• Title/Summary/Keyword: qualia structure

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

An analysis of terminological definitions (전문용어의 정의문 분석)

  • Lee Hae-Yun
    • Koreanishche Zeitschrift fur Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft
    • /
    • v.7
    • /
    • pp.145-163
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this paper, we examined various definitions of terminological definition for the extraction of terminological information from corpora. After we reviewed researches at the lexicography and at the terminology, we introduced the qualia structure of Generative Lexicon (Pustejovsky 1995) for the purpose of analyzing terminological definitions. By means of the qualia structure, we analyzed the definitions which are presented at the terminological dictionaries. As a result, we confirmed that the terminological definitions can be discomposed into 4 subtypes of qualia structure. Based on this examination, we analyzed terminological definitions of articles at a newspaper and showed the usefulness of the qualia structure at the extraction of terminological definitions from the corpora.

  • PDF

Combination of the Verb ha- ′do′ and Entity Type Nouns in Korean: A Generative Lexicon Approach. (개체유형 명사와 동사 ′하-′의 결합에 관한 생성어휘부 이론적 접근)

  • 임서현;이정민
    • Language and Information
    • /
    • v.8 no.1
    • /
    • pp.77-100
    • /
    • 2004
  • This paper aims to account for direct combination of an entity type noun with the verb HA- 'do' (ex. piano-rul ha- 'piano-ACC do') in Korean, based on Generative Lexicon Theory (Pustejovsky, 1995). The verb HA-'do' coerces some entity type nouns (e.g., pap 'boiled rice') into event type ones, by virtue of the qualia of the nouns. Typically, a telic-based type coercion supplies individual predication to the HA- construction and an agentive-based type coercion evokes a stage-level interpretation. Type coercion has certain constraints on the choice of qualia. We further point out that qualia cannot be a warehouse of pragmatic information. Qualia are composed of necessary information to explain the lattice structure of lexical meaning and co-occurrence constraints, distinct from accidental information. Finally, we seriously consider co-composition as an alternative to type coercion for the crucial operation of type shift.

  • PDF

Morphological Passivization and the Change of Lexical-Semantic Structures in Korean

  • Kim, Yoon-shin
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Language and Information Conference
    • /
    • 2002.02a
    • /
    • pp.195-204
    • /
    • 2002
  • The purpose of this paper is to analyze the lexical-semantic structure of morphologically derived passive verbs in Korean based on Pustejovsky (1995)'s Generative Lexicon Theory (GL) and to explain the change of the root verb's lexical-semantic structure by means of passivization. Passivization in this paper is defined as the unaccusaztivization. In Argument Structure of derived passive verbs, the agent argument is deleted and the theme argument is realized as a syntactic subject. As for Event Structure, derived passives express left-headed event (achievement), whereas their roots denote right-headed event (accomplishment). In Qualia Structure, passive verbs and root ones have the same Fomal Role, but in Agentive Role of passive verbs, an act weakens to a process. Both Formal and Agentive Roles have the same theme argument.

  • PDF

The Semantic Structure and Argument Realization of Korean Passive Verbs (한국어 피동동사의 의미구조와 논항실현)

  • 김윤신;이정민;강범모;남승호
    • Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.25-32
    • /
    • 2000
  • Korean passive verbs are derived from their corresponding active verbs by suffixation or by adding endings and auxiliaries to their stems. Therefore. we assume p passive verbs share some lexical informations with their active counterparts. This paper extending the Generative Lexicon theory of Pustejovsky (995). aims to characterize the argument realization patterns of Korean passive verbs focusing on the case alternation a and to propose their lexical semantic structures which account for the syntactic behavior.

  • PDF