• 제목/요약/키워드: private education expenditures

검색결과 32건 처리시간 0.017초

유치원 방과후과정과 특성화활동 이용 현황 (The survey of use of after-school courses and specialization programs at Kindergarten)

  • 이진화;박진아
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제18권10호
    • /
    • pp.490-498
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구는 유치원을 이용하는 부모들을 대상으로 방과후과정과 특성화활동 이용 현황을 살펴보고, 그 결과를 토대로 효과적인 정책 개선 방안을 제안하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 693명의 부모를 대상으로 면담원이 부모와 대면 면담조사를 실시하였고, 수집된 자료는 백분율, 평균과 표준편차 등을 이용하여 결과를 산출하였다. 먼저 방과후과정 이용현황을 조사한 결과를 보면, 첫째, 방과후과정 이용에 따른 추가 부담 지출 비율이 전체 조사 대상의 약 38.2%이며, 추가 비용의 평균액은 약 62,850원이었다. 비용부담과 만족도를 5점 만점 기준으로 볼 때, 보통수준으로 나타났다. 둘째, 방과후과정 참여 이유로는 부모의 맞벌이, 자녀가 친구들과 시간을 함께 보내게 하고 싶어서 등과 같은 순으로 나타났다. 다음으로 방과후특성화활동 이용 현황을 살펴본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 방과후특성화활동 이용 유아 비율은 조사 대상의 약 68.2%이며, 그 중에서 비용 지출 유아는 약 79.0%, 평균 이용 개수는 약 2.69개이며, 평균 비용은 83,540원으로 조사되었다. 둘째, 선호하는 교육프로그램은 영어가 압도적인 비율로 높게 나타났으며, 자녀들이 활동을 좋아해서 참여한다고 응답한 비율이 가장 높았다. 셋째, 방과후특성화활동 개선요구 사항으로는 교육내용의 내실화가 1순위로 제시되었다. 마지막으로 방과후특성화활동으로 인해 부모의 사교육비 지출이 감소되었다는 응답비율이 높게 나타났다. 이와 같은 조사 결과를 토대로 방과후과정 및 특성화활동 성격에 맞는 적합한 교육프로그램 개발 및 실행 등의 개선 방안을 논의하였다.

The Comparison of Basic Science Research Capacity of OECD Countries

  • Lim, Yang-Taek;Song, Choong-Han
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제11권1호
    • /
    • pp.147-176
    • /
    • 2003
  • This Paper Presents a new measurement technique to derive the level of BSRC (Basic Science and Research Capacity) index by use of the factor analysis which is extended with the assumption of the standard normal probability distribution of the selected explanatory variables. The new measurement method is used to forecast the gap of Korea's BSRC level compared with those of major OECD countries in terms of time lag and to make their international comparison during the time period of 1981∼1999, based on the assumption that the BSRC progress function of each country takes the form of the logistic curve. The US BSRC index is estimated to be 0.9878 in 1981, 0.9996 in 1990 and 0.99991 in 1999, taking the 1st place. The US BSRC level has been consistently the top among the 16 selected variables, followed by Japan, Germany, France and the United Kingdom, in order. Korea's BSRC is estimated to be 0.2293 in 1981, taking the lowest place among the 16 OECD countries. However, Korea's BSRC indices are estimated to have been increased to 0.3216 (in 1990) and 0.44652 (in 1999) respectively, taking 10th place. Meanwhile, Korea's BSRC level in 1999 (0.44652) is estimated to reach those of the US and Japan in 2233 and 2101, respectively. This means that Korea falls 234 years behind USA and 102 years behind Japan, respectively. Korea is also estimated to lag 34 years behind Germany, 16 years behind France and the UK, 15 years behind Sweden, 11 years behind Canada, 7 years behind Finland, and 5 years behind the Netherlands. For the period of 1981∼1999, the BSRC development speed of the US is estimated to be 0.29700. Its rank is the top among the selected OECD countries, followed by Japan (0.12800), Korea (0.04443), and Germany (0.04029). the US BSRC development speed (0.2970) is estimated to be 2.3 times higher than that of Japan (0.1280), and 6.7 times higher than that of Korea. German BSRC development speed (0.04029) is estimated to be fastest in Europe, but it is 7.4 times slower than that of the US. The estimated BSRC development speeds of Belgium, Finland, Italy, Denmark and the UK stand between 0.01 and 0.02, which are very slow. Particularly, the BSRC development speed of Spain is estimated to be minus 0.0065, staying at the almost same level of BSRC over time (1981 ∼ 1999). Since Korea shows BSRC development speed much slower than those of the US and Japan but relative]y faster than those of other countries, the gaps in BSRC level between Korea and the other countries may get considerably narrower or even Korea will surpass possibly several countries in BSRC level, as time goes by. Korea's BSRC level had taken 10th place till 1993. However, it is estimated to be 6th place in 2010 by catching up the UK, Sweden, Finland and Holland, and 4th place in 2020 by catching up France and Canada. The empirical results are consistent with OECD (2001a)'s computation that Korea had the highest R&D expenditures growth during 1991∼1999 among all OECD countries ; and the value-added of ICT industries in total business sectors value added is 12% in Korea, but only 8% in Japan. And OECD (2001b) observed that Korea, together with the US, Sweden, and Finland, are already the four most knowledge-based countries. Hence, the rank of the knowledge-based country was measured by investment in knowledge which is defined as public and private spending on higher education, expenditures on R&D and investment in software.

  • PDF