• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2000.10a
• /
• pp.259-262
• /
• 2000

The Cross-impact Hierarchy Process (CHP), an extended model of the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) which is linked to Cross Impact Analysis(CIA), is a powerful decision making tool to assist in the ranking of large number of dependent technological alternatives. In this paper, we will describe an application of the CHP to the aerospace industry. We here conducted a questionnaire survey for S company that is one of the representative aerospace companies in Korea. A questionnaire was designed to obtain both the priority with dependence (the CHP priority) and the priority with independence (the AHP priority) in order to compare the priority derived by each of two methods. The hierarchy in this case study is concerned with priority setting for R&D area to ensure dependent aerospace design technology of the company, The result shows that there exists the difference hard to neglect between the final priorities gained by two methods.

• Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2010

This paper aims to compare four operating priority rules of RMGC (Rail Mounted Gantry Crane) used in semi-automated container terminal. The four priority rules employed in this paper are FCFS (First-come-first-served), LCFS (Last-come-first-served), TOS (Turn-over-served) and NFS (Nearest-first-served). And to compare the four operating priority rules, this paper analyzed productivity of RMGC and CC (Container Crane), waiting time of YT (Yard Truck) and RT (Road Truck) in container yard, and turnaround time of RT in container terminal of each priority rule by using stevedoring simulation. As a result, NFS was evaluated as the best rule to improve the overall productivity of container terminal in terms of all criteria.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.44-53
• /
• 1989

This paper concerns with the case of having a goal program with no preassigned deterministic ranking for the goals. The priority ranking in this case depends on the states of nature which are random variables. The Bayesian approach is performed to obtain the nondominated set of rankings.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.122-132
• /
• 2004

The aim of this paper is to show the process of R&D Project-Priority Ordering in the Defense Technology field. We propose specific methods (Delphi, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Scoring) to order the R&D Project-Priority. In general, to decide the priority of R&D projects most of researches depend on questionnaires which are surveyed by experts. However, it is criticized that this process cannot reflect the limitation of experience and knowledge of experts. In this process, we separate evaluators in two parts: the first is strategic experts, the second is technical experts. Evaluators can choose and evaluate the alternatives which they are familiar with, so we can obtain reliable results. Finally, based on our process of the R&D Project-Priority Ordering we formulate policy implications for managing the defense technology.

• Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.115-135
• /
• 2008

An interesting problem in capacitated supply chains is how to guarantee customer service levels with limited resources. One of the common approaches to solve the problem is differentiating service depending on customer classes. High-priority customers receive a better service at the cost of low-priority customers' service level. One of common criteria to determine a customer's priority in practice is whether he has made a reservation before arrival or not. Customers with a reservation usually receive service based on the time the reservation was made. We examine the effect this advance information of customer arrival has on customer service levels. We show the trade-offs between the leadtime and other system characteristics such as the proportion of high-priority customers. when the service level is high. We also suggest how to differentiate service using the asymptotic ratio of the service levels for both types of customers.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.39-54
• /
• 1979

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 1994.04a
• /
• pp.515-515
• /
• 1994

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 1999.04a
• /
• pp.111-112
• /
• 1999

• Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2002

The objective of this paper is to develop a new priority setting algorithm that considers the cross-impact of the future technology alternatives and that satisfies the final goal of the technology management through multi-hierarchy evaluation criteria. By combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model, which is a well-known priority setting model, and Cross Impact Analysis (CIA) model, which is a technological forecasting method that considers cross-impact among R&D Items, we developed an Integrated Cross-Impact Hierarchical (CIH) model, which sets the priority by considering technological forecasting and technology dependency simultaneously. A step-by-step numerical example of the model developed here is presented as backup of its practicality.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2000.10a
• /
• pp.302-305
• /
• 2000

The operation of a networked computing system (NCS), such as Internet, can be viewed as a resource allocation problem, and can be analyzed using the techniques of mathematical modeling. We define a general NCS and translate that setup into a model of an economy. The preferences of users are taken as primitives, and servers in the network are viewed as productive firms with priority input queues. Each sewer charges a rental price for its services by priority class. We characterize optimal system allocation, and derive formulae for supporting rental prices and priority premia such that the aggregated individual user demands do not exceed optimal levels and waiting-time expectations are correct. Our economic approach has the added benefit of providing a sound basis for evaluating NCS investment alternatives, using a process analogous to free entry and exit in free-enterprise economies.