• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• v.13 no.10
• /
• pp.5047-5052
• /
• 2012

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy of women in Kashmir. This study was conducted with the objective of assessing hormone receptor positivity and its correlation with age at diagnosis, tumor size, histological grade and lymph node metastasis. Materials and Methods: 132 newly diagnosed cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed at the Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, J&K, were included after excluding biopsies, in-situ lesions and recurrence cases. Results: Mean age of the patients was 48.2 years, 59.1% being ${\leq}50$ years of age. Mean duration of symptoms was 6.32 months. Most lesions (65.1%) were 2-5 cm and 16.7% were ${\geq}5.0$ cm in greatest dimension. The predominant (80.3%) morphology was IDC-NOS. The majority of the cases presented as grade II (52.1%) lesions and lymph node involvement was present in 65.2%. ER and PR were positive in 66.3% and 63.4% cases, respectively, increasing with rising age. High grade lesions and larger size tumors were more likely to be ER and PR negative. No correlation was found between ER/PR status and lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: ER and PR expression in breast cancers in the current study was found to be higher than studies done in India/Asia but lower than studies conducted in the West, even on Indian/Asian immigrants. Markedly lower receptor expression in Indian/Asian studies is likely due to preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer are strongly advocated for standardization of receptor evaluation and for clinical management of breast cancer patients to provide best therapeutic options.

• Journal of Interdisciplinary Genomics
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.5-9
• /
• 2020

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a genetic bleeding disorders caused by a deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Diagnosis or exclusion of VWD is not an easy task for most clinicians. These difficulties in diagnosis or exclusion of VWD may be due to preanalytic, analytical and postanalytic laboratory issues. Analytical systems to diagnose VWD may produce misleading results because of limitations in their dynamic range of measurement and low sensitivity. However, preanalytical issues such as sample collection, processing, and transportation affect the diagnosis of VWD profoundly. We will review here the common preanlytical issues that may impact the laboratory diagnosis of VWD.