• 한국항해학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.91-109
• /
• 1994

Technological and organisational changes in transport system have introduced new dimension into port system development and inter-port competition. The quality of service now required by the customer is costly and not easily provided by small shipping companies and small ports. It has been suggested that in the future container shipping may be concentrated by space-sharing arrangements or actual mergers into the hands of a few mega-operators with the investment potential to provide total logistics networks. In order to compete effectively, high load factors will be essential and port concentration inevitable. A fa-voured few ports will become the load centres and other ports will assume a secondary feeder role. In this study, three questions are raised and attempts are made to answer them : (a) what is the new role of ports today ; (b) why should ports be engaged in this new role ; and (c) how can ports play this new role. In short, a modern port should be a service centre and a logistic platform for international trade and transport-a third generation port. Ports, in particular, have to make every effort to be competitive in the cost and quality of services and to make the port a transport and distribution service centre. For most ports, this is not an option but a must ; an essential requirement for survival in this win or lose situation. The best way to win is to maintain a close contact with port users, listen to them, discuss with them, help them and satisfy them. That is port marketing. Starting from the findings of port marketing, it is es-sential to work out appropriate development plans and marketing targets and to improve port competitive-ness. As an alternative method, a port competitiveness model is suggested, which may help port managers to make appropriate improvements.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.171-178
• /
• 2003

세계적으로 항만간 경쟁이 전방위로 전개되고 있는 가운데 우리나라를 비롯하여 아시아 각국은 자국 항만을 중심항만으로 육성하려고 대대적인 항만개발에 나서고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 아직까지 중심항 개발전략의 유효성에 대한 이론적 검토는 충분하지 못한 실정이다. 본 연구는 i) 대형항만에 물동량이 집중되는 항만집중화 현상이 일어나는가 ii) 과연 대형항만은 소형항만에 비해 물동량 증가속도가 빠른가를 검토함으로써 중심항만 개발전략에 대한 시사점을 도출해 보고자 한다. 이를 위해 먼저 허쉬만-허핀달지수를 적용하여 아시아 항만의 항만집중도를 분석하였고, 또한 글로벌 차원과 지역적 차원에서 컨테이너 항만규모와 성장간 실증분석을 시도하였다. 분석 결과, 항만집중도에 있어서 아시아 특히 동북아지역은 항만물동량의 분산화 경향이 강한 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 항만규모와 성장간 관계의 경우 글로벌 차원에서는 대형항만일수록 물동랑 증가율이 소형항만에 비해 높게 나타난 반면, 아시아지역은 소형항만일수록 물동량 증가율이 높게 나타났다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.129-151
• /
• 2010

This study is to analyze the efficiency of Korean fishing ports using DEA. First, the study calculated the efficiency scores based on a CCR-BCC framework and hence technical, pure technical, and scale efficiency scores are seperated for the 38 fishing ports under study. The Average of technical, pure technical, and scale efficiency are turned out to be 0.6834, 0.8582, and 0.7774 respectively. The 15 fishing ports are fully efficient under the constant returns to scale while 21 fishing ports under the variable returns to scale. Second, the super efficiency scores are also calculated under the radial model without the consideration of slacks. The highest score is turned out to be 4.4984 for the P16 fishing port with the average score of 0.9652 for the entire fishing ports. Nevertheless, P16 fishing port has showed up only once as a reference set. On the other hand, P34 fishing port has showed up 11 times as a reference set, which scored the second highest score of 2.9815. Finally the super efficiency scores are calculated under the non-radial model with the explicit consideration of slacks. Now the P34 fishing port scored the highest score of 2.3424 with even 15 times referred to a bench-mark. Therefore the importance of P34 fishing port is emphasized once again on the field of bench-marking for the efficiency of fishing ports. When the targets for the input factors to improve the efficiency of each DMU are calculated the area of fishing port needs the most adjustment to be reduced for 40.36% on the average, while the cosignment sales area does the least adjustment for 13.70%.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2003년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2003

세계적으로 항만간 경쟁이 전방위로 전개되고 있는 가운데 우리나라를 비롯하여 아시아 각국은 자국 항만을 중심항만으로 육성하려고 대대적인 항만개발에 나서고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 아직까지 중심항 개발전략의 유효성에 대한 이론적 검토는 충분하지 못한 실정이다. 본 연구는 i) 대형항만에 물동량이 집중되는 항만집중화 현상이 일어나는가 ii) 과연 대형항만은 소형항만에 비해 물동량 증가속도가 빠른가를 검토함으로써 중심항만 개발전략에 대한 시사점을 도출해 보고자 한다 이를 위해 먼저 허쉬만-허핀달지수론 적용하여 아시아 항만의 항만집중도론 분석하였고, 또한 글로벌 차원과 지역적 차원에서 컨테이너 항만규모와 성장간 실증분석을 시도하였다. 분석 결과, 항만집중도에 있어서 아시아 특히 동북아지역은 항만물동량의 분산화 경향이 강한 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 항만규모와 성장간 관계의 경우 글로벌 차원에서는 대형항만일수록 물동량 증가율이 소형항만에 비해 높게 나타난 반면, 아시아지역은 소형항만일수록 물동량 증가율이 높게 나타났다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.91-98
• /
• 2009

부산항은 과거 싱가포르, 홍콩항에 이어 세계 3위의 컨테이너항만에서 상해항과 선전항의 급부상으로 세계 5위로 순위가 하락했다. 이처럼 중국항만의 성장으로 동북아 중심항만을 목표로 하는 우리나라 항만에게 위협이 되고 있다. 따라서 국내 항만의 위기를 극복하기 위해서는 항만의 경쟁전략 수립이 우선시 되어야 한다. 본 연구는 항만의 경쟁전략 수립에 앞서 '나의 경쟁상대는 누구인가?' 라는 질문으로 시작하였다. 경쟁에 관한 주제는 과거 많은 항만관련 연구들이 경쟁의 요인(factor)이나 항만의 효율성(efficiency)에 관해 다루고 있다는 점과 차이가 있다. 연구에 앞서 기존의 문헌연구 고찰을 통해 항만가치 경쟁의 의미를 재정의 하였다. 다음으로 항만의 경쟁을 부산항을 비롯한 5개의 국내 주요 항만 수출입물동량을 바탕으로 국내 항만간 경쟁구조를 파악하였다.

• 해양환경안전학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 해양환경안전학회 2017년도 추계학술발표회
• /
• pp.111-111
• /
• 2017

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.79-93
• /
• 2004

Recently, the change of shipping and port environment has required the new strategy from the liners, terminal operators, ports. The ports of call in the North American and European line also has changed as the Chinese ports made rapid advance. This seems to result from the fact that the trend of the container transportation by sea has developed the traditional concept, called port-to-port system that directly links between a port and another port into the network with complicated hierarchical structure reflecting costs, efficiency, and strategy of the Mega Carrier. This paper suggests the factors for Busan port to become the hub port of northeast Asia by analyzing the change of the liners' strategy along the change of the shipping and port environment, the global management of the operator of container port, and the amount of containers flowing in the northeast Asia.

• 한국지능시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국퍼지및지능시스템학회 2000년도 추계학술대회 학술발표 논문집
• /
• pp.129-132
• /
• 2000

Grouping ports in certain region by their characteristics could be used as the principal informations to establish national policy for port development or investment and also to analyze the competitiveness between ports. Currently Korean ports are divided into two groups such as the local port and the designated port containing foreign trade port and coastal port under the Korean port law. These divisions seem to be used for port administration as the matter of convenience but some qualitative grouping is needed for research of port problems. In this paper, 28 major Korean ports were clustered by the similar characteristics using Fuzzy C-Means and found to be classified 8 qualitative groups.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.43-68
• /
• 2003

With development of Asia's economy, the ports in trunk route have increased its handling capacity According to previous studies, main determinants to become hub-port are referred to location, connection inland transport with hinterland, port service availability and efficiency, cost of port handling, socio-economic stability and port information system etc. This study aims to investigate the changes in factors determine port's competitiveness particularly in Asian neighbor ports such as Hong Kong port and Shenzen port, and Singapore port and the Port of Tanjung Pelapas in Malaysia by comparing and analyzing main indicators relating to those ports. In conclusion, main reasons which gained competitiveness by newly developed ports such as Shenzen port and the Port of Tanjung Pelapas were port price and massive hinterland space offered.

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.143-154
• /
• 2000

In port management, the scale of facilities and port layouts are major factors characterizing the port, which influence port economics and productivities continuously through the port operation. Grouping ports in certain region by their characteristics could be used as the principal informations to establish national policy for port development or investment and also to analyze the competitiveness between ports. Currently Korean ports are divided into two groups such as the local port and the designated port containing foreign trade port and coastal port under the Korean port law. These divisions seem to be used for port administration as the matter of convenience but some qualitative grouping is needed for research of port problems. In this paper, 20 major Korean ports were clustered by the similar characteristics using Fuzzy C-Means and found to be classified 8 qualitative groups.