• Title/Summary/Keyword: pluralism of agricultural extension

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Challenges for Public Agricultural Extension Services Response to the Pluralism of Extension in South Korea (농촌지도사업의 다원화에 따른 공적 지도사업의 역할과 과제)

  • Ko, Soonchul
    • Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development
    • /
    • v.27 no.2
    • /
    • pp.51-64
    • /
    • 2020
  • The agricultural extension services in Korea have been provided by the Rural Development Administration, a government organization, since 1962. This aims to explore the issues in pluralism of extension worldwide, and to suggest tasks needed to improve public extension in Korea. Based on the review of background, types and issues of pluralism of agricultural extension, the following tasks were suggested for the public extension in Korea; Firstly, need to identify the lessons from the other countries where the pluralism system has been adopted, Secondly, need to compile the inventory about the private extension agencies and to assess their capacities, Thirdly, need to assess the farmers' satisfactory level on the services provided by public and private agencies, and the farmer's willingness to pay, Finally, need to further discussions to promote the partnership between public and private extension agencies.

Ehtiopiam Agricultural Extension System -The Past Experience, Present Status and Future Direction- (에티오피아 농촌지도사업의 현재와 미래)

  • Besha, Dagnachew Bekele;Park, Duk-Byeong
    • Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.219-244
    • /
    • 2014
  • Agricultural extension service in Ethiopia was started in early 1950s with mandate of transferring local research outputs and technologies to farmers, and importing technologies and improved practices from abroad. Extension service provided in this early time was limited to areas surrounding the experiment stations. Since then, Ethiopian Agricultural extension service has passed through at least five stages: the land grant extension system, the Comprehensive Package Programs, the Minimum Package Projects, the Peasant Agricultural Development Program, and the Participatory Demonstration and Training Extension System (PADETS). The comprehensive package extension program was initially implemented in selected pilot areas and eventually to be scaled up to cover about 90% of the farming community within 15-20 years time. The program used demonstration plots managed by development agents and used to train farmers organized through various field days. However, since all of these programs were operational in only small areas, the vast majority of the country was out of their reach. Through Participatory Demonstration and Training Extension System, the extension service in Ethiopia has come under the spotlight and government debates and external reviews are putting additional scrutiny on the system. Despite this long history, the system is still in its infancy in terms of coverage, communication and institutional pluralism. Currently in Ethiopia the Agricultural extension is provided primarily by the public sector, operating in a decentralized manner through which extension is implemented at the district level. Therefore, the main focus of this paper is to scrutinize the past, the present and the future Agricultural extension system in Ethiopia.