• Title/Summary/Keyword: pan-government EA

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Reestablishing EA as a Pan-Government IT Governance Tool (국가정보화 거버넌스 체계정립을 위한 EA 노력의 변화 분석)

  • Kim, Sung Kun;Oh, Seung Woon;Shin, Shinae
    • Informatization Policy
    • /
    • v.17 no.3
    • /
    • pp.21-35
    • /
    • 2010
  • Enterprise Architecture (EA) is known as a means to solve IT management problems. In 2005, the South Korean government introduced it and required each agency to develop a variety of architectural products. Such an early-stage EA effort turned out to be not very effective because those products were hardly of use for pan-government IT governance. Realizing these problems, the Lee Myung Bak government has decided to change its direction so that EA products would also be utilized at pan-government IT decisionmaking. After reviewing the early stage of EA effort, we in this study describe such a transition. Future directions of EA efforts are also discussed at the end.

  • PDF

A Study on Solving Problems in Pan-government IT Investment Management: Focusing on Architectural Ways (범정부 정보화 투자관리 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구: 아키텍처적 방법을 중심으로)

  • Oh, Seung Woon;Kim, Choong Nyoung
    • Journal of Information Technology and Architecture
    • /
    • v.9 no.4
    • /
    • pp.377-389
    • /
    • 2012
  • According to the E-Government Readiness Index announced by UN in 2012, the Republic of Korea ranked top again following the last time. However, according to the national competitiveness index announced by IMD, that of the Republic of Korea has still ranked in the world's top 20 for three successive years. In particular, the area of government efficiency took the 25th place in 2012, descending three steps compared to that in 2011, and the area of infrastructure related to informatization has been ranking 20th for three years. This phenomenon can prove that the Republic of Korea's informatization is not producing good outcome, and the investment in informatization is not creating good effects. This phenomenon was analyzed in terms of a life cycle of informatization in this study. As the result, it was revealed that structural problems remain in each step, the linking of information in each step is insufficient, reasonable trace management is absent ,and information management depending on systematic plan is lacking. To solve these problems, improvement measures through architecture consideration were suggested.