본 실험은 대두 단백질의 생화학적 특성을 품종면에서 밝혀 고단백 대두 품종 육성을 위한 기초를 보강코저 실시하였다. 광범위한 재래종을 포함한 우리나라 품종 46, 일본 품종 9, 미국계 품종 31등 도합 86품종을 동일조건에서 재배하여 종실의 단백질, 지방, 탄수화물, 회분 함량 및 아미노산 조성의 품종간 변이, 그들 성분 함량간의 상호관계, acrylamide gel 전기영동법에 의한 종실 단백질 구성분 조합의 품종적 특성 그리고 그들과 단백질함량 및 기타 성분함량과의 상호관계를 분석 추구하였고, 고단백 품종 서해 20호, 저단백 품종 Shelby 및 중간형 광교의 종실성숙중 단백질 및 지방의 축적, 단백질구성분들의 소장을 종실 발달과정과 관계하여 그 품종간 차이를 밝히고저 하였다. 1. 공시 86품종의 종실 성분함량은 단백질 34.4(Capital)～50.6%(서해 20호), 지방 15.0(소립종)～27.9% (Capital), 탄수화물26.1(서해 20호)～35.7% (수계 6001), 회분 4.8(Comet)～6.6%(금강소립)이었다. 2. 단백질함량은 지방함량 및 탄수화물함량과 각각 -0.73
1970~1971년(年)에 걸쳐 잣나무의 자웅화(雌雄花)가 개화(開花)하여 구과(毬果)가 성숙(成熟)하기까지 임업시험장(林業試驗場) 서울시험임내(試驗林內)에 고정모수(固定母樹) 2본(本)과 보조모수(補助母樹) 3본(本)을 선정(選定)하여 7~10일간격(日間隔)으로 구과(毬果)를 채취(採取)하여 외부형태(外部形態)와 내부조직(內部組織)의 변화상(變化相)을 밝히고 구과(毬果)의 종자(種子)의 함수량(含水量)을 비롯하여 유지(油脂), 당(糖), 단백질(蛋白質) 등(等) 함유물질(含有物質)의 변화(變化)와 발아력(發芽力)을 갖게되는 시기등(時期等)을 종합적(綜合的)으로 연구(硏究)하였으며 그 결과(結果)를 요약(要約)하면 다음과 같다. 1. 웅화(雄花) 1) 4월하순(月下旬)~5월상순(月上旬) 화분모세포군(花粉母細胞群)이 형성(形成)되고 다시 5월상순(月上旬)~5월중순(月中旬)에 환원분열(還元分裂)을 하여 사분자(四分子)가 되고 단핵상(單核狀)의 화분(花粉)은 그후분열(後分裂)하여 5월하순(月下旬) 성숙비산(成熟飛散)하였다. 2) 한 개의 웅화수(雄花穗)의 웅예수(雄蘂數)는 구과(毬果)의 유효인편수(有效鱗片數)와 거의 비슷한 69~102개(個)로서 1개(個)의 웅예내(雄蘂內)에는 5800~7300립(粒)의 화분(花粉)이 들어있다. 3) 성숙화분(成熟花粉)의 형태(形態)는 원형(圓形) 또는 타원형(楕圓形)으로 좌우(左右)에 기낭(氣囊)이 달렸으며 화분(花粉)의 길이는
토양정밀조사결과 우리나라에서 밝혀진 235 개(個)의 토양통에 대하여 분류체계를 확립(確立)코저 미국(美國)의 신토양분류법에 준(準)하였는바 60개(個)의 아군으로 구분할 수 있었다. 그러나 수도재배기간중(水稻栽培期間中) 담수상태(湛水狀態)를 유지(維持)하게되는 답토양들은 신분류법(新分類法)에 분류기준(分類基準)이 확립(確立)되어 있지않아 토양형태적특성에 입각(立脚)하여 분류(分類)코저 할때 무리(無理)가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 답토양의 분류상(分類上) 문제시(問題視)된 것은 토양아군의 수준(水準)에서 18개(個)였으며 이들 새로운 아군에 대하여 분류기준(分類基準)을 설정(設定)(Setup)하였는 바 그 분류시안(分類試案)의 내용(內容)을 요약(要略)하면 다음과 같다. Anthro aquic, Aquic Udipsamments; 관개수(灌漑水)의 영향(影響)을 받아 표토(表土)로 부터 50cm이상(以上) 회색화작용(灰色化作用)을 받은 사질계충적토(砂窒系沖積土)이며 사두(沙頭)및 김천통등(金川統等)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthroaquic Udipsamments; 관개수(灌漑水)의 영향(影響)을 받아 표토(表土)로 부터 50cm 이내(以內)에서 회색화작용(灰色化作用)을 받은 사질계충적토(砂窒系沖積土)로 백수통(白岫統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Halic Psammaquents; 개답년대(開畓年代)가 오래되지 않은 간척지의 염해답으로 낙천통이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthroaquic, Aquic Udifluvents; 관개수(灌漑水)의 영향(影響)을 받아 표토(表土)에서 50cm이상(以上) 회색화작용(灰色化作用)을 받은 사양질 및 식양질계 충적토로 마영통(馬嶺統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthroaquic Udifluvents: 관개수(灌漑水)의 영향(影響)을 받아 표토(表土)로부터 50cm이내(以內)에서 회색화작용(灰色化作用)을 받은 사양질 및 식양질계 충적토로 행곡통(杏谷統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fluventic Haplaquepts: 지하수위(地下水位)가 높아 토양은 전층이 회색화(灰色化)된 습답으로 유기물(有機物)의 함량(含量)은 토심(土深)이 깊어짐에 따라 불규칙적(不規則的)으로 감소(減少)되는 회색토(灰色土)로 백구 및 학성통등(鶴城統等)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fuventic Thapto-Histic Haplaquepts: Fluventic Haplaquepts와 유사(類似)하나 토양단면내에 유기물층이 개재된 습답으로 공덕(孔德) 및 서탄통(西炭統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fluventlc Aeric Haplaquepts: Fluventic Haplaquepts보다 지하수위(地下水位)가 비교적(比較的) 낮으므로 토양배수가 약간 불량(不良)한 회색토(灰色土)로 만경(萬頃) 및 전북통등(全北統等)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fluventic Thapto-Histic Aeric Hapldquepts: Fluventic Thapto-Histic Haplaquepts보다 지하수위(地下水位)가 비교적(比較的) 낮으므로 토양배수가 약간 불량(不良)한 회색토(灰色土)로 봉남통(鳳南統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fluventic Aeric Sulfic Haplaquepts: Fluventic Aeric Haplaquepts에 비(比)하여 토심(土深) 50~150cm 사이에 황색반문(黃色斑紋)(PH<4.0)인 유화물집적층이 있는 회색토(灰色土)로 등구통이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fluventic Sulfaquepts: 이들 토양은 주(主)로 강하류(江下流)에서 바다로 유입(流入)되는 지점(地点) 및 간석 소택지에 분포(分布)되며 표토(表土)에서 50cm이내(以內)에 유화물집적층이 있는 습답으로 봉림(鳳林) 및 해척통(海拓統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Fluventic Aeric Sulfaquepts: Fluventic Sulfaquepts 보다 지하수위(地下水位)가 비교적(比較的) 깊으므로 토양 배수(排水)가 약간 불량(不良)한 회색토(灰色土)로 김해통(金海統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthro aquic Fluvaquentic Eutrochrepts: 관개수(漑水)의 영향(影響)을 받아 표토(表土)로 부터 50cm이상(以上) 회색화(灰色化)되고 염기포화도가 높은(>60%) 토양이며 장유(長有) 및 칠곡통등(漆谷統等)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthro aquic Dystric Fluventic Eutrochrepts: Anthro aquic Fluvaquentic Eutrochrepts와 유사(類似)하나 회색화작용(灰色化作用)은 표토(表土)로부터 50cm이내(以內)에서만 나타나는 토양이며 월곡(月谷) 및 경산통등(慶山統等)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthro aquic Fluventic Dystrochrepts; Anthro aquic Dystric Fluventic Eutrochrepts에 비(比)하여 염기포화도가 낮은(<60%) 토양으로 고천(高川) 및 비곡통등(秘谷統等)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthre aquic Eutrandepts; 염기포화도가 높은 (>50%) 화산회토(火山灰土)로 대정통(大靜統)이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthre aquic Hapludalfs; 관개수(灌漑水)의 영향(影響)을 받아 표토(表土)로부터 50cm 이내(以內)에서 회색화작용(灰色化作用)을 받은 적황색토(赤黃色土)로 화동(華東) 및 용수통등이 이에 속(屬)한다. Anthro aquic Aquic Hapludalfs; Anthro aquic Hapludalfs에 비(比)하여 회색화작용(灰色化作用)을 더 받은(표토(表土)에서 50cm이상(以上)) 적황색토(赤黃色土)로 덕평(德坪) 및 극락통등이 이에 속(屬)한다.
In china, six bibliographies of offical historical books are evaluated at the most important things among the systematically-editing bibliographies. These bibliographies would be usful to study the orign of classical sciences and their development, bibliographic research of Chinese classics, bibliographic judgement on genuine books, titles, authors, volumes. They could be refered to research into graving, correcting, and existence of ancient books. therefore, these bibliographies would be applied to estimation the phase of scientific and cultural development. The study of these bibliographies has been not yet made in Korea. This thesis lays its importance on the background of their appearance, their classification norms, organizing system of their catalogue, and comparison between their difference. 1. Editing and compiling of Chilyak (칠약) by Liu Chin (유흠) and official histories played an important role of entering an apperance of historical book's bibliographies. Chilyak has been lost. However, its classification and compiling system of classical books would be traced by Hansoyemunji(한서예문지) of which basic system is similar to Chilyak. It classified books according to their scientific characteristic. If a few books didn't have their own categories, they were combined by the circles parallel to the books' characteristic. With the books classified under the same scientific characteristic, they were again divided into the scientific schools or structures. It also arranged the same kinds of books according to the chronology. The some books wi th duplicate subjects were classified multiplely by their duplicate subject. 2. Ssu-ma Chon's (사마천) The Historical Records (Saki, 사기) and Pan Ku's (반고) The History of the Former Han Dynasty (Hanso, 한서) has also took effects on appearance of historical books' bibliographies. Covering overall history, Saki was structured by the five parts: The basic annals(본기), the chronological tables (표), the documents (서), the hereditary houses (세가), biographies (열전). The basic annals dealt with kings and courts' affairs according to the chronology. The chronological tables was the records of the annals. The documents described overall the social and cultural systems. The hereditary houses recorded courts' meritorious officials and public figures. The biographies showed exemplars of seventy peoples selected by their social status. Pan Ku(반구)'s The History of the Former Han Dynasty(한서) deserved to be called the prototype for the offical histories after Saki's (사기; The Historical Records) apperance. Although it modelled on Saki, it had set up its own cataloguing system. It was organized by four parts; the basic annals (본기), the chronological tables (표), treatises(지), biographies (열전). The documents in the Hanso(한서) was converted into treatises(지). The hereditary houses and biographies were merged. For the first time, the treatise with The Yemunji could operate function for historical bibliographies. 3. There were six historical bibliographies: Hansoyemunji(한서예문지), Susokyongjeokji (수서경적지), Kudangsokyongjeokji(구당서경적지), Shindangsoyemunji (신당서예문지), Songsayemunji (송사예문지), Myongsayemunji (명사예문지). 1) Modelling on Liu Chin's Chilyak except Chipryak(집략), Hansoyemunji divided the characteristic of the books and documents into six parts: Yukrye(육예), Cheja(제자), Shibu(시부), Pyongsoh(병서), Susul(수술), Pangki(방기). Under six parts, there were thirty eight orders in Hansoyemunji. To its own classification, Hansoyemunji applied the Chilyak's theory of classification that the books or documents were managed according to characteristic of sciences, the difference of schools, the organization of sentences. However the overlapped subjects were deleted and unified into one. The books included into an unsuitable subject were corrected and converted into another. The Hansoyemunji consisted of main preface (Taesoh 대서), minor preface (Sosoh 소서) , the general preface (Chongso 총서). It also recorded the introduction of books and documents, the origin of sciences, the outline of subjects, and the establishment of orders. The books classified by the subject had title, author, and volumes. They were rearranged by titles and the chronological publication year. Sometimes author was the first access point to catalogue the books. If it was necessary for the books to take footnotes, detail notes were formed. The Volume number written consecutively to order and subject could clarify the quantity of books. 2) Refering to Classfication System by Seven Norms (칠분법) and Classification System by Four Norms(사분법), Susokyongjeokji(수서경적지) had accomplished the classification by four norms. In fact, its classification largely imitated Wanhyosoh(완효서)'s Chilrok(칠록), Susokyongjeokji's system of classification consisted of four parts-Kyung(경), Sa(사), Cha(자), Chip(칩). The four parts were divided into 40 orders. Its appendix was again divided into two parts, Buddihism and Taiosm. Under the two parts there were fifteen orders. Totally Susokyongjeokji was made of six parts and fifty five orders. In comparison with Hansoyemunji(한서예문지), it clearly showed the conception of Kyung, Sa, Cha, Chip. Especially it deserved to be paid attention that Hansoyemunji laied history off Chunchu(춘추) and removed history to Sabu(사부). However Chabu(사부) put many contrary subjects such as Cheja(제자), Kiye(기예), Sulsu(술수), Sosol(소설) into the same boundary, which committed errors insufficient theoretical basis. Anothor demerit of Susokyongjeokji was that it dealt with Taiosm scriptures and Buddism scriptures at the appendix because they were considered as quasi-religion. Its compilation of bibliographical facts consisted of main preface(Taesoh 대서), minor preface(Sosoh 소서), general preface (Chongsoh 총서), postscript (Husoh 후서). Its bibliological facts mainly focused on the titles. Its recorded authors' birth date and their position. It wrote the lost and existence of books consecutive to total number of books, which revealed total of the lost books in Su Dynasty. 3) Modelling on the basis of Kokumsorok(고분서록) and Naewaekyongrok(내외경록), Kudangsokyongjeokji(구당서경적지) had four parts and fourty five orders. It was estimated as the important role of establishing basic frame of classification by four norms in classification theory's history. However it had also its own limit. Editing and compling orders of Kudangsokyongjeokji had been not progressively changed. Its orders imitated by and large Susokyongjeokji. In Its system of organizing catalogue, with its minor preface and general preface deleting, Kudangsokyongjeokji by titles after orders sometimes broke out confusion because of unclear boundaries between orders. 4) Shindangsoyemunji(신당서예문지), adding 28,469 books to Kudangsokyongjeokji, recorded 82,384 books which were divided by four parts and fourty four orders. In comparison with Kudangkyongjeokj, Sindangsoyemunji corrected unclear order's norm. It merged the analogical norms four orders (for instance, Kohun 고훈 and Sohakryu 소학류) and seperated the different norms four orders (for example, Hyokyong 효경 and Noneuhryu 논어류, Chamwi 참위 and Kyonghaeryu 경해류, Pyonryon 편년 and Wisaryu 위사류). Recording kings' behaviors and speeches (Kikochuryu 기거주류) in the historical parts induced the concept of specfication category. For the first time, part of Chipbu (집부) set up the order of classification norm for historical and literatural books and documents (Munsaryu 문사류). Its editing and compiling had been more simplified than Kudangsokyongjeokji. Introduction was written at first part of bibliographies. Appendants except bibliographic items such subject, author, title, volume number, total were omitted. 5) Songsayemunji(송사예문지) were edited in the basis of combining Puksong(북송) and Namsong(남송), depending on Sabukuksayemunji(사부국사예문지). Generally Songsayemunji had lost a lot of bibliographical facts of many books. They were duplicated and wrongly classified books because it committed an error of the incorrectly annalistic editing. Particularly Namsong showed more open these defaults. Songsayemunji didin't include the books published since the king Youngchong(영종). Its system of classification was more better controlled. Chamwiryu(참위류) in the part of Kyongbu(경부) was omitted. In the part of history(Sabu 사부), recordings of kings' behaviors and speeches more merged in the annals. Historical abstract documents (Sachoryu 사초류) were seperately arranged. In the part of Chabu(자부), Myongdangkyongmaekryu(명당경맥류) and Euisulryu(의술류) were combined. Ohangryu(오행류) were laied off Shikuryu(시구류). In the part of Chipbu(집부), historical and literatural books (Munsaryu 문사류) were independentely arranged. There were the renamed orders; from Wisa(위사) to Paesa(패사), Chapsa (잡사) to Pyolsa(열사), Chapchonki(잡전기) to Chonki(전기), Ryusoh(류서) to Ryusa(류서). Introduction had only main preface. The books of each subject catalogued by title, the volume number, and author and arranged mainly by authors. Annotations were written consecutively after title and the volume number. In the afternote the number of not-treated books were revealed. Difference from Singdangsohyemunji(신당서예문지) were that the concept and boundary of orders became more clearer. It also wrote the number of books consecutive to main subject. 6) Modelling on Chonkyongdangsomok (경당서목), Myongsayemunji(명사예문지) was compiled in the basis of books and documents published in the Ming Danasty. In classification system, Myongsayemunji partly merged and the seperated some orders for it. It also deleted and renamed some of orders. In case of necessity, combining of orders' norm was occured particulary in the part of Sabu(사부) and Chabu(자부). Therefore these merging of orders norm didn't offer sufficient theretical background. For example, such demerits were seen in the case that historical books edited by annals were combined with offical historical ones which were differently compiled and edited from the former. In the part of Chabu(자부), it broke out another confusion that Pubga(법가), Meongga(명가), Mukga(묵가), Chonghweongka's(종횡가) thoughts were classified in the Chapka(잡가). Scriptures of Taiosim and Buddhism were seperated from each other. There were some deleted books such as Mokrokryu(목록류), Paesaryu(패사류) in the part of history (Sabu 사부) and Chosaryu(초사류) in the part of Chipbu(집부). The some in the each orders had been renamed. Imitating compiling system of Songsayemunji(송사예문지), with reffering to its differ-ence, Myongsayemunji(명사예문지) wrote the review and the change of the books by author. The number of not-treated books didn't appear at the total. It also deleted the total following main subject.
본(本) 시험(試驗)은 국내(國內) 활엽수로서 중요한 참나무속(屬)의 상수리나무와 침엽수(針葉樹)의 대표적(代表的) 수종(樹種)인 소나무를 공시목(公試木)으로 선정(選定)하여 곡목가공분야(曲木加工分野)에서 널리 이용(利用)하는 자비법(煮沸法)과 증자법(蒸煮法)에 의한 휨가공성(加工性)을 조사(調査)하고, 이에 관련(關聯)된 인자(因子)로서 변(邊) 심재(心材), 연륜각도(年輪角度), 연화처리온도(軟化處理溫度), 연화처리시간(軟化處理時間), 목재함수율(木材含水率) 및 목재결함(木材缺陷) 등(等)의 영향(影響)과 휨가공(加工)후의 곡율반경변화(曲率半經變化) 및 약제처리(藥劑處理)에 의한 휨가공성(加工性)의 개선방법(改善方法)을 구명(究明)하기 위하여 실시(實施)되었다. 이 때 사용(使用)된 자비(煮沸)와 증자처리용(蒸煮處理用) 시편(試片)의 크기는 두께와 너비 15mm, 길이 350mm이고 약제처리용시편(藥劑處理試片)의 크기는 두께 5mm, 너비 10mm 및 길이 200mm로 제작(製作)하였으며, 시편(試片)의 함수율(含水率)은 자비처리(煮沸處理)에는 생재(生材)를 사용(使用)하고 증자처리(蒸煮處理)에는 15%로 조습(調濕)된 건조재(乾燥材)를 사용(使用)하였다. 또한 약제처리(藥劑處理)는 포화요소용액(飽和尿素溶液), 35% 포르말린 용액(溶液), 25% 폴리에칠렌(400) 수용액(水溶液) 및 25% 암모니아수에 5일간(日間) 상온(常溫)으로 침지(浸漬)한 우 휨가공(加工)을 행하였다. 본(本) 시험(試驗)에서 얻은 결과(結果)를 요약(要約)하면 다음과 같다. 1. 상수리나무와 소나무의 목재내부온도(木材內部溫度)는 자비(煮沸) 또는 증자처리시간(蒸煮處理時間)에 따라 초기(初期) 약(約)