• 제목/요약/키워드: nonmetric mds

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.018초

승용차 내부소음의 음질평가 실험연구 (Experimental Study on Subjective Evaluation of Car Interior Sound Quality)

  • 최병호;아우구스트쉬크
    • 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국소음진동공학회 2003년도 추계학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.177-182
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study is directed toward determining the number and characteristics of psychologically meaningful perceptual dimensions required for assessing the sound Ouaiity with respect to vehicle interior and/or exterior noises. and toward identifying the acoustical or psychoacoustical bases underlying the perception. By nonmetric MDS and clustring analysis of sound quality data sets on our own, of critical importance are two perceptual dimensions for which subjective verdicts can be interpreted as loudness and sharpness. The perceptual dimensions based upon similarity judgments could be accounted for 48% and 24% of the variance. each of which might be a match for the acoustic parameter "A-weighted maximum pressure level"(r= .85) and for the psychoacoustic parameter "sharpness" (r= .65), respectively. On the other hand, the perceptual dimensions based upon preference ratings could explain 66% and 10% of the variance. where the acoustic parameter "A-weighted maximum pressure leve"(r= .92) might be taken to be a best predictor, but sharpness appeared to be less suitable for the description of Preference behavior. Linked to the results, the problems of quantitative modelling of subjective sound quality evaluation and also of implementing corresponding cognitive combination rule for technical and industrial applications, say having "winner-sound qualify" according to preference criteria will be shortly in discussion.

  • PDF

생물지수와 수질을 이용한 양재천과 여의천의 생태건강성평가 (Ecological health assessment of Yangjaecheon and Yeouicheon using biotic index and water quality)

  • 이진효;한현;이준연;차영섭;조석주
    • 환경생물
    • /
    • 제40권2호
    • /
    • pp.172-186
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구에서는 2019년~2020년 2년 동안 양재천과 여의천을 대상으로, 이화학적 수질항목(17항목)과 함께 저서동물지수와 우점도지수 및 다양도지수 등의 군집지수와 연계하여 두 하천의 생태건강성을 평가하였다. 또한 저서동물 생물지수의 현장 적용성 평가 및 및 두 하천 간 저서동물 분포특성을 통계적으로 비교하기 위하여 각각 상관분석(correlation analysis)과 비계량적 다차원척도법(nMDS, nonmetric multidimensional scaling)을 활용하였고, 이를 통해 도심하천의 하천생태계 현황을 진단하는 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 조사 결과, 양재천(주암교, 보도교, 대치교)은 총 39종, 3,787개체가 출현하였으며, 양재천 수질(BOD, TOC, TP 기준)은 II등급(약간 좋음) 이상이며, 저서동물을 이용한 BMI는 모든 지점에서 C등급(보통)으로 나타났다. 여의천(상류, 새원교, 여의교)은 총 51종, 4,199개체가 출현하였으며, 여의천 수질(BOD, TOC, TP 기준)은 양재천과 유사하게 II등급(약간 좋음) 이상으로, BMI는 상류 및 새원교 모두 B등급(좋음), 여의교는 C등급(보통)으로 나타나는 등 전반적으로 양재천과 여의천 모두 수질 및 하천 환경상태는 유사한 것으로 확인되었다. 특히 저서동물 분포상태를 비계량적 다차원척도법으로 분석한 결과에서도 두 하천 간의 유의미한 차이를 볼 수 없었으며(p=0.1491), 이때 수온과 DO 환경인자가 두 하천에서의 저서동물 분포와 상관성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 저서동물 생물지수와 주요 수질항목과의 상관분석 결과, 풍부도지수와 저서동물지수가 현장 수질평가에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 확인되었다.

승용차소음의 주관적 음질평가 실험연구 (Experimental Study on Subjective Sound Quality Evaluation of Vehicle Noises)

  • 최병호
    • 한국소음진동공학회논문집
    • /
    • 제14권12호
    • /
    • pp.1223-1232
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study is directed toward determining the number and characteristics of psychologically meaningful perceptual dimensions required for assessing the sound quality with respect to vehicle noises, and toward identifying the acoustical and/or psychoacoustical bases underlying the preference and similarity judgments. For the purpose of analyzing the paired comparison data produced by subjective ratings we used nonmetric multidimensional scaling(MDS). The perceptual dimensions based upon preference ratings could explain 76.3 % of the variance by maximum dB(A) and sharpness acum. The correlation between objective and subjective positions of the stimuli is $R^2$=0.97(F(1,13)=195.45, p < .01), corrected $R^2$=0.93. The less the intensity of the stimulus the more becomes the subjective Position would be over-estimated relative to the objective one. The same is valid for the opposite case. The perceptual dimensions based upon similarity judgments could be accounted for 47.8 % and 23.5% of the variance, each of which might be a match for the maximum dB(A) and the sharpness acum, respectively. The correlation between objective and subjective positions of the stimuli is $R^2$=0.94(F(1,13)=92.38, p < .01), corrected $R^2$=0.87. The more the intensity of the stimulus the more becomes the subjective position would be over-estimated relative to the objective one. The same is valid for the opposite case. In other words, it is likely that the larger the amount of two stimuli which to compare would be judged similar. So far it should be further clarified that whether the relationship between preference ratings and psychological distances nay be optimized through which psycho-physical models.