• 제목/요약/키워드: non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.014초

급성 관상동맥 증후군을 가진 환자에서 심장 CT의 역할 (The Potential Role of Cardiac CT in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome)

  • 이상현;추기석
    • 대한영상의학회지
    • /
    • 제83권1호
    • /
    • pp.28-41
    • /
    • 2022
  • 급성 관상동맥 증후군은 관상동맥 경화반의 갑작스러운 파열과 관련된 3가지 유형의 관상동맥 질환을 의미하며 임상적으로는 ST 분절 상승 심근경색에서 비 ST 분절 상승 심근경색 또는 불안정성 협심증 등으로 표현된다. 심장 CT의 기술 발전을 통해 심장 CT는 관상동맥 내 죽상동맥경화반의 정량화 및 특성을 평가할 수 있게 되었으며, 현재까지 낮은 감쇠의 경화반, 냅킨 반지 표시, 양성 리모델링, 점상 석회화 및 증가된 혈관 주변 지방 감쇠가 심장 CT에서 경화반 파열을 의미하는 것으로 알려져 있다. 따라서 심장 CT는 관상동맥의 혈관협착정도를 진단하는 것을 넘어 급성 관상동맥 증후군을 진단하는데도 많은 기여를 하고 있다.

Prognostic significance of non-chest pain symptoms in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

  • Kim, Inna;Kim, Min Chul;Park, Keun Ho;Sim, Doo Sun;Hong, Young Joon;Kim, Ju Han;Jeong, Myung Ho;Cho, Jeong Gwan;Park, Jong Chun;Cho, Myeong Chan;Kim, Jong Jin;Kim, Young Jo;Ahn, Youngkeun
    • The Korean journal of internal medicine
    • /
    • 제33권6호
    • /
    • pp.1111-1118
    • /
    • 2018
  • Background/Aims: Chest pain is an essential symptom in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). One-third of patients with ACS present atypically, which can influence their receiving timely lifesaving therapy. Methods: A total of 617 NSTEMI patients from the Korea Acute MI Registry (KAMIR) and the Korea Working Group on MI (KorMI) databases were analyzed. The study population was divided into two groups by symptoms at presentation (typical symptoms group, 128; atypical symptoms groups, 128). Results: In this study population, 23% of patients presented without chest pain. After propensity score matching, the contact-to-device time ($2,618{\pm}381minutes$ vs. $1,739{\pm}241minutes$, p = 0.050), the symptoms-to-balloon time ($3,426{\pm}389minutes$ vs. $2,366{\pm}255minutes$, p = 0.024), and the door-to-balloon time ($2,339{\pm}380minutes$ vs. $1,544{\pm}244minutes$, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the patients with atypical symptoms than in those with typical symptoms, respectively. Atypical symptoms were an independent predictor for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 2.820; 95% confidence interval, 1.058 to 7.515; p = 0.038). The Kaplan-Meier estimates showed higher risk for 12-month mortality in patients with atypical symptoms (p = 0.048) and no significant difference for 12-month major adverse cardiac events (p = 0.487). Conclusions: Acute myocardial infarction patients with atypical symptoms were not rare in clinical practice and showed a high risk of delayed reperfusion therapy. After imbalance between the groups was minimized by use of propensity score matching, patients who presented atypically had a high mortality rate.