• Title/Summary/Keyword: needle-embedding therapy

Search Result 41, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

The Effect of Oriental Medicine Treatments for Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (극상근 건병증의 한의학적 치료에 대한 연구 동향: 체계적 문헌 고찰과 메타 분석)

  • Dong-Hyeob Kang;Do-Hoon Lee;Sang-Joon Yoo;Seok-Gyu Yang;Ja-Yean Son;Seol Jung;Hea-Ju Kim;Minjin Kwon;Oh-Bin Kwon;Seon-Woo Jang;Hyun-Woo Cho
    • Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.45-59
    • /
    • 2023
  • Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the trends of researches on oriental medicine treatments for supraspinatus tendinopathy. Methods We used five databases for searching researches; Korean studies Information Service System, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, Research Information Sharing Service, PubMed, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Only randomized controlled trials suitable for the subject were selected. The methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results Twenty randomized controlled trials were analyzed. There were 9 types of treatment interventions; acupuncture, acupotomy, pharmacopuncture, electroacupuncture, fire needling, warming needle, catgut-embedding therapy, herbal medicine, cupping. The most frequently used treatment intervention was acupuncture and acupotomy. There were 9 outcome measurements including visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and range of motion. The most used measurement was VAS. As a result of meta-analysis, acupuncture was more effective than control group in VAS. Additionally, acupotomy was clinically significant compared to control groups in VAS and CMS. Conclusions In this review, we analyzed researches on effectiveness of oriental medicine for supraspinatus tendinopathy. A provisional conclusion can be produced that acupuncture and acupotomy showed beneficial effect to supraspinatus tendinopathy. Although there were some RCT studies, many of them had a high risk of bias, so it is hard to conclude that our study can include overall clinical status. Further well-designed trials are needed.