• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.192-202
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to prepare a more efficient operation alternative for both systems by comparing and analyzing the recently introduced COOP(Continutiry of Operation Plan) and existing NIPP(National Infrastructure Protection Plan). Method: The basic data of the two systems were collected for research and compared and analyzed by dividing them into the content and procedural aspects. In addition, The efficient operation alternative were derived for experts in the disaster area by utilizing AHP. Result: The National Infrastructure Protection Plan(NIPP) and the Continuity of Operation Plan(COOP) were found to be very similar in terms of content and procedures, and the AHP survey also found that integrating the two schemes was a more efficient and effective operation method. Conclusion: As the recently introduced the Continuity of Operation Plan(COOP) has a wider area of activity than the National Infrastructure Protection Plan(NIPP), and has a continuous management system structure with a more precise workframe, A more efficient national safety net will be realized by reorganizing and integrating it into a more enhanced the Continuity of Operation Plan(COOP) through readjustment of relevant laws and regulations.

• Journal of Korean Society of societal Security
• /
• v.2 no.3
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 2009

The occurrence of disaster lately is coming with the more complex form and increasing the necessity of National Infrastructures Protection Plan(NIPP). International and domestic laws and systems related to critical infrastructures were investigated. The program in which the classification of national critical infrastructures was expanded eight fields to thirteen fields including emergency services, large gathering sites, defense industrial base, and national monuments was presented in this study. The plan for integrating national critical infrastructures, national important infrastructures and national security infrastructures and a NIPP framework were proposed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.423-424
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 미국의 국가핵심기반보호제도의 변화에 대해 고찰하고 시사점을 도출한다. 이를 위해 9/11 테러 공격 이후 국가핵심기반보호계획(National Infrastructure Protection Plan)을 중심으로 관련 법률 및 제도와 조직변화를 추적하고 고찰하였고, 이들의 관계를 도식화하여 타임라인(timeline)분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구를 통해 국토안보대통령령-8호(HSPD-8), 대통령령-21호(PDD-21), 사이버보안과 핵심기반법(Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Act)등의 관련 법제 변화를 통해 총 3가지 버전의 NIPP이 있음을 확인할 수 있었으며, 2018년에 사이버보안과 주요인프라청(CISA)이 창설되어 국가핵심기반보호제도업무를 이곳으로 이관하여 운영되고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 국가핵심기반을 보는 관점이 9/11 테러 공격 이후 주요 핵심기반 보호(Protection)에서 주요핵심기반의 복원력(Resilience)제고로 변화하고 있음을 도출하였다.