• 제목/요약/키워드: myofacial pain syndrome(MPS)

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.017초

체성 연관통(Somatic Referred Pain)에 대한 고찰 (The Study on Somatic Referred Pain)

  • 윤종태;송윤경;임형호
    • 대한추나의학회지
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.195-204
    • /
    • 2004
  • This paper describes possible mechanism of the somatic referred pain. The study of somatic referred pain mechanism is necessary because many patients suffer from several types of muscle pain. This review compares the somatic referred pain with MPS(myofacial pain syndrome). There are similarities between these two pain mechanisms. But the therapeutics of somatic referred pain is yet remain fully unknown. Therefore this review consider origin of variable referred pain. Also it is recommendable to study referred pain mechanism in terms with oriental medical pain concept.

  • PDF

근막통증후군에 대한 경피신경전기자극과 간섭전류치료의 효과 비교 (Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Current on Myofacial Pain Syndrome)

  • 김명종;이준희;최원호
    • 대한임상전기생리학회지
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study was conducted to assess the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS) and interferential current(IFC) in the patients with myofascial pain syndrome(MPS) on upper trapezius. Twenty patients with MPS on upper trapezius was assigned randomly to TENS group(n=10), IFC group(n=10). In TENS group, TENS was applied to the trigger point. In IFC group, IFC was applied to the trigger point. Duration of treatment was 2 weeks. Effects were assessed before treatment, post treatment by visual analogue scale(VAS), and pain rating score(PRS). Significant change of VAS was noticed in TENS group and IFC group. Significant change of PRS was noticed in TENS group and IFC group. IFC groups were significantly higher than TENS group that of the VAS and PRS. These result showed that IFC is effective treatment method for pain control in patients with MPS.

  • PDF

손저림 증상을 호소하는 86명의 환자들에 대한 아시혈 진단법과 약침치료 효능에 관한 연구 (Clinical Analysis about Diagnosis and Treatment of 86 Hand Paresthesia Cases Using MPS Theory and Pharmacopuncture Therapy)

  • 오성원;정종진;김수연;한인선;강현민;권기록;김병우
    • 대한약침학회지
    • /
    • 제10권3호
    • /
    • pp.121-126
    • /
    • 2007
  • Objectives Hand paresthesia is common syndrome and the cause is more unknown than known reason. The Purpose of this study were investigated the effects of Myofacial Pain Syndrome theory to make diagnosis and treatment by Pharmacopuncture for the patients of hand paresthesia. Method This study was carried out to established the clinical criteria of hand parethesia. The patients who had past history of diabeics, neuropathy induced by alcohol or drug were excluded, and 86 patients who had hand paresthesia related with unknown-reason was selected by the interview process. And the effects of Pharmacopuncture theory were analyzed using VAS score before and after treatment. Results and conclusions 56.9% of unknown-reason patients are positive at diagnosis by MPS theory. While positive group decrease from $62.81{\pm}14.27$ to $25.28{\pm}15.97$, negative group decrease from $55.88{\pm}10.92$ to $48.28{\pm}14.01$ by VAS scores. Positive group was accordingly more effective than negative group. So diagnosis and treatment for hand numbness patients by MPS theory was useful in clinical.

흉곽출구증후군으로 손 저림을 호소하는 환자들에 대한 Sweet BV의 아시혈적 치료 효능 관찰 (Clinical Analysis about Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome(MPS) with Sweet Bee Venom on Hand Paresthesia based on Thoracic Outlet Syndrome)

  • 오성원;김병우;안중철;윤휘철;박재석;권기록
    • 대한약침학회지
    • /
    • 제13권2호
    • /
    • pp.85-92
    • /
    • 2010
  • Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Sweet Bee Venom(Sweet BV) Therapy between the hand paresthesia patients with Osteoporosis and without Osteoporosis. Methods: This study was carried out to established the clinical criteria of hand parethesia. The patients who had past history of diabeics, neuropathy induced by alcohol or drug and was positive on Myofacial Pain Syndrome Theory were excluded. 32 patients who had hand paresthesia related with unknown-reason was selected by the interview process. And the effects of treatment were analyzed using VAS score before treatment, after treatment, after 1 month and after 3 months. Results and conclusion: After treatment, While Osteoporosis group decrease from $64.81{\pm}7.81$ to $27.21{\pm}7.32$, Non-Osteoporosis group decrease from $58.76{\pm}1.43$ to $24.74{\pm}3.81$ by VAS scores. and After 3 months, While Osteoporosis group increase from $27.21{\pm}7.32$ to $54.96{\pm}9.40$, Non Osteoporosis group increase from $24.74{\pm}3.81$ to $32.43{\pm}5.57$. Non-Osteoporosis group was accordingly more effective than Osteoporosis group after 3 months. So Sweet BV therapy for hand numbness patients without Osteoporosis was e effective than patients with Osteoporosis.