• Title/Summary/Keyword: multipath signal

Search Result 481, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Comparative Analysis between Photogrammetric and Auto Tracking Total Station Techniques for Determining UAV Positions (무인항공기의 위치 결정을 위한 사진 측량 기법과 오토 트래킹 토탈스테이션 기법의 비교 분석)

  • Kim, Won Jin;Kim, Chang Jae;Cho, Yeon Ju;Kim, Ji Sun;Kim, Hee Jeong;Lee, Dong Hoon;Lee, On Yu;Meng, Ju Pil
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
    • /
    • v.35 no.6
    • /
    • pp.553-562
    • /
    • 2017
  • GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver among various sensors mounted on UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) helps to perform various functions such as hovering flight and waypoint flight based on GPS signals. GPS receiver can be used in an environment where GPS signals are smoothly received. However, recently, the use of UAV has been diversifying into various fields such as facility monitoring, delivery service and leisure as UAV's application field has been expended. For this reason, GPS signals may be interrupted by UAV's flight in a shadow area where the GPS signal is limited. Multipath can also include various noises in the signal, while flying in dense areas such as high-rise buildings. In this study, we used analytical photogrammetry and auto tracking total station technique for 3D positioning of UAV. The analytical photogrammetry is based on the bundle adjustment using the collinearity equations, which is the geometric principle of the center projection. The auto tracking total station technique is based on the principle of tracking the 360 degree prism target in units of seconds or less. In both techniques, the target used for positioning the UAV is mounted on top of the UAV and there is a geometric separation in the x, y and z directions between the targets. Data were acquired at different speeds of 0.86m/s, 1.5m/s and 2.4m/s to verify the flight speed of the UAV. Accuracy was evaluated by geometric separation of the target. As a result, there was an error from 1mm to 12.9cm in the x and y directions of the UAV flight. In the z direction with relatively small movement, approximately 7cm error occurred regardless of the flight speed.