• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회(1)
• /
• pp.538-539
• /
• 2005

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회(1)
• /
• pp.196-197
• /
• 2005

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회(1)
• /
• pp.774-776
• /
• 2005

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2002년도 학술발표회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.134-139
• /
• 2002

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회(2)
• /
• pp.1224-1225
• /
• 2005

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 1995년도 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.384-389
• /
• 1995

• 한국지역사회생활과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지역사회생활과학회 2006년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.83-87
• /
• 2006

• 대한원격탐사학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한원격탐사학회 2003년도 Proceedings of ACRS 2003 ISRS
• /
• pp.1332-1333
• /
• 2003

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 1998년도 학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.59-64
• /
• 1998

The characteristics of agricultural water rights in multi-purpose dams in Korea was examined. The river system with multi-purpose dams can be divided into national river system and WRC(Water Resources Corporation) river system according to ownership of dam use rights. While the national river system have permitted water rights, the WRC river system have vest water rights and contract water rights. The two river systems have different characteristics of agricultural water rights, and therefore the water right of two system need to be unified. It is also known that water release from multi-purpose dams against water demand does not satisfy agricultural water rights.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.37-49
• /
• 2014

With the globalized coming of the knowledge-based society following the post-industrial period, both the crises and opportunities have been occurring together as non-special affairs, which is the same situation in Rural Korea. A crucial key for maximization of potentialities of emerging opportunities is to mobilize the multi-valuedness embedded in rural areas as one of new growth powers. In order to realize a variety of multi-valuedness of rurality, it should be needed to re-discover and re-evaluate rural resources by paradigm shift and to identify the multi-valuedness of resources systematically and scientifically. On the basis of this understanding, this study aimed at setting up the evaluation indicators system by rural village types to identify systematically the multi-valuedness embedded in rural villages in the initial step. Integrated evaluation indicators system was made with 4-level hierarchies; high-leveled one with 3 fields(society, environment, regional economy); middle-leveled one with 8 areas; lower-leveled one with 19 sub-areas; detailed indicators totally with 39 items. These indicators were divided into 12 basic indicators applied to all types and 27 specialized indicators determining the characteristics of village types.