• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.77-80
• /
• 2002

원자력시설의 정상 운영시 일반인에 대한 단위 집단선량의 금전가 (피폭선량 금전가) 모델을 기본으로, 사고후 만성피폭에 대해 보다 적용 타당한 모델을 제안하였다. 아울러 우리나라 경제 환경자료를 사용하여 제안된 모델에 근거하여 평가한 피폭선량 금전가를 정상 운영시로부터 유도된 값을 수정없이 그대로 사고후 만성 피폭에 적용한 값과 비교, 분석하였다. 제안된 방법론에 근거할 경우 집단선량은 같다하더라도 피폭받은 집단내 개인선량의 불균일성 차이에 따라 피폭선량 금전가는 상당히 다르게 나타났다. 또한 할인율도 피폭선량 금전가 결정에 있어서 중요한 요소로 작용하였다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.78-84
• /
• 1997

The specific purpose of this study is to develop the numerical guide for the cost-benefit analysis of ORE ($/person-Sv reduction) to meet the criterion of ALARA in the design stage of the KNGR. In deriving the guide, the risk factor which is defined by the risk to unit collective radiation exposure dose (deaths/person-Sv) and the monetary value of human life ($/death) are required. The risk factor has been estimated from various clinical data accumulated for a number of years and continuously modified. And the monetary value of human life is usually quantified using the human capital approach. In this study, the risk to radiation exposure perceived by a group of people is investigated through an extensive poll survey conducted among university students in order to modify the existing risk factor for radiation exposure. And in evaluating the monetary value of human life, the QOL factor is introduced in order to incorporate the degree of public welfare or quality of life. As a result of study, a value within the range of 151, 000~172, 000 dollars per person-Sv reduction is recommended as the appropriate interim numerical guide for cost-benefit analysis of ORE to meet the criterion of ALARA in the design stage of the KNGR. A poll survey was also conducted in order to see whether the public acceptance cost of nuclear power should be incorporated in developing the guide, and the result of study shooed that such a cost does not need to be considered.