• Title/Summary/Keyword: method of presenting anomalous data

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Degree of Cognitive Conflict by Learner Personality and the Method of Presenting Anomalous Data in Science Learning (과학 학습에서 학습자 성격유형과 불일치 상황 제시 방법에 따른 인지갈등 정도)

  • Choi, Hyuk-Joon;Hong, Yun-Hee;Lee, Jae-Nam;Kwon, Mi-Rang;Seo, Sang-Oh;Kim, Ji-Na;Kim, Jun-Tae;Kwon, Jae-Sool
    • Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.441-449
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purpose of this study was to examine the degree of cognitive conflict by learner personality and the method of presenting anomalous data to induce cognitive conflict. The participants of this study were 461 high school students. To arose cognitive conflict, an actual demonstration was done for half of the participants and a logical article for the rest. MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) was used to find the learner personality types, and CCLT (Cognitive Conflict Level Test) was used to measure the degree of cognitive conflict aroused when anomalous data was confronted. The results of this study indicated that learner personality types influence the degree of cognitive conflict. First, participants were divided into two personality types via preferences on each of the four preference indices; extraversion (E) or introversion (I), sensing (S) or intuition (N), thinking (T) or feeling (F), judgment (J) or perception (P). The cognitive conflict scores of the thinking types were significantly higher than those of the feeling types. Participants were also divided four personality types according to personality functional types: ST, SF, NT and NF. SF type showed a significantly lower cognitive conflict score than any of the other types. According to the type of learner personality, cognitive conflict was influenced differently by the method of presenting anomalous data. For example, the judgment types had a higher cognitive conflict score by logical argument, and the perception types showed a higher score by demonstration. In conclusion, learner cognitive conflicts were influenced by personality types and the methods of presenting anomalous data.

Safety Index Evaluation from Resistivity Monitoring Data for a Reservoir Dyke (전기비저항 상시관측에 의한 제체 안전도 지수 산출)

  • Cho, In-Ky;Kang, Hyung-Jae;Lee, Byoung-Ho;Kim, Byoung-Ho;Yi, Sang-Sun;Park, Young-Gyu;Lee, Bo-Hyun
    • Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.155-162
    • /
    • 2006
  • An abnormal seepage flow, which is mainly caused by the piping, is one of the major reasons for embankment dam failure. A leakage detection is therefore a vital part of an embankment dam's monitoring. Resistivity method, which is an efficient tool to detect leakage zones, has been used all over the world for an embankment dam's monitoring. Although the resistivity method gives us very useful information about the leakage problem, there is no more quantitative interpretation than the low resistivity zones in the 2-dimensional resistivity section are regraded simply as the anomalous seepage zones. Recently, resistivity monitoring technique is applied for the detection of leakage zones. However, its interpretation still remains in the stage of presenting the resistivity ratio itself. An increased seepage flow increases a porosity and an increasing porosity decreases the dam's stability. Therefore, the porosity is one of the major factors for an embankment dam's stability. Based on Archie's experimental formula, we try to evaluate a porosity distribution from the resistivity data which is obtained on the dam's crest. We also attempt to represent a procedure to evaluate a safety index of the embankment dam from the resistivity monitoring data.