• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.92-99
• /
• 2008

Objectives : Effective cancer prevention and control measures can only be done when dependable data on the cancer incidence is available. The Seoul Cancer Registry (SCR) was founded to provide valid, comparable and representative cancer incidence data for Koreans. We aimed to compare the cancer incidence in the first (1993-1997) and second term (1998-2002) of the SCR, and we analyzed the annual incidence trend during that 10 years. Methods : The SCR detects potential cancer cases through the Korean Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) data, the health insurance claims, the individual hospital's discharge records and the death certificates. About 87% of the SCR data is registered through the KCCR. The rest of the data is registered by SCR registrars who visit about $70{\sim}80$ mid-sized hospitals in Seoul to review and abstract the medical records of the potential cancer patients. Results: The total number of new cancer cases was higher in $1998{\sim}2002$ than in $1993{\sim}1997$ by 20.6% for men and 18.4% for women, respectively. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of total cancer per 100,000 increased 1% (from 295.4 to 298.3) for men and 5.1% (from 181.5 to 190.7) for women, between the two periods. The commonest cancer sites during 1998-2002 for men were stomach, liver, bronchus/lung, colorectum, bladder and prostate, and the commonest cancer sites for women were breast, stomach, colorectum, cervix uteri, thyroid and bronchus/lung. Compared with the ASRs in 1993, the ASRs in 2002 increased for colorectum (58.4% for men, 27.1% for women), prostate (81.5%), breast (58.3% for women), thyroid (141% for women), and bronchus/lung (15.4% for women). The ASRs for stomach (-18.7% for men, -20.7% for women) and uterine cervix cancer (-39.7%) had decreased. Conclusions : The cancer incidence is increasing in Seoul, Korea, especially for the colorectum and prostate for men, and for the breast, colorectum, bronchus/lung and thyroid for women.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.113-145
• /
• 2010

Nowadays, it is surely the quack which stands as one of the most controversial, problematic. the quack has been a consistent target of contested public protection strategies in the past few centuries in many countries. Recently, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly utilized and accepted by patients and providers throughout the health care system in the world, most accounts attribute this growing acceptability to the shortcomings of conventional medicine, the appeal of CAM's core beliefs, and the growing body of research indicating that CAM actually works. However, the governments of western countries have called for measures to ensure that the public are protected from incompetent and dangerous practitioners. Common to these controversies has been a suggestion to ban, exclude or limit the medical practice of those deemed to be damaging rather than improving the health of individuals as a measure of public protection. This article describes the experiences of western counties' health care system which is moving in a more pluralistic direction. By examining the ways in which regulatory efforts in the countries have come to address what is invariably described as a growing interest in CAM, this study show how the problem of CAM/quackery today is increasingly located in an ethical field of practitioner competency, qualifications, conduct, responsibility and personal professional development, regardless of the form of therapy in question. Many countries developed a series of measures and strategies to contain the acceptance of CAM groups, such as insisting on scientific evidence of safety and efficacy, resisting integration of CAM with conventional medicine and opposing government support for research and education. In a sense, those countries' movements serve to protect not only patients, but the dominant position of medicine and its allied professions, and to maintain existing jurisdictional boundaries within the healthcare system. The popular support for CAM will require that health professional stakeholders continue to address the challenges this poses, and at the same time protect their position at healthcare system. To cope with the quack, professional body, public sector and health authorities should consider the safety of consumers of healthcare and responding to the demands of the community for CAM therapies as well as the claims of the established healthcare professions. Finally, some implications for future health care were suggested.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제50권3호
• /
• pp.360-372
• /
• 2023

본 연구의 목적은 소아치과 전문의 인력 현황을 파악하고 만 19세 미만 환자의 연간 치과 이용량과 소아치과의사의 진료 생산성을 바탕으로 소아치과 전문의 인력 공급의 적정성을 평가하는 것이며 향후 정책 수립을 위한 의견을 알아보고자 하였다. 소아치과의사들을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 통해 '일반적인 특성', '연간 진료 횟수 및 근무 일수', '급여진료 비율', '전문의 수급 인식'에 대한 응답을 수집하였다. 대한소아치과학회, 건강보험심사평가원, 국민건강보험공단, 국가통계포털을 통해 소아치과의사 현황 및 진료 청구 횟수, 연간 출생아 수 감소 등을 조사하였다. 진료과목을 소아치과로 표방하는 치과는 전체 의료기관의 절반에 달했지만 실제 소아치과 의사가 근무하는 곳은 3.78%에 불과했다. 전체 소아치과의사의 61.36%가 수도권에 집중된 지역적 불균형을 보였다. 지난 20년 동안 소아청소년 인구는 지속적으로 감소했지만, 급여 진료 청구 횟수는 지속적으로 증가하고 있다. 지난 10년간 소아치과 전문의 적정 공급량은 4,000명 내외로 유지되었다. 소아치과 의사의 92.15%가 정부 차원의 정책 마련과 지원 방안이 필요하다고 생각하였다. 본 연구가 향후 소아치과 전문의 수요예측 방법 확립을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.