• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.114-122
• /
• 2024

This study aimed to identify the multiple mediation effects of job satisfaction and job commitment on the relationships between job stress and workers' safety behavior in terms of compliance and participation, in which the multiple mediation effects are a hybrid of parallel and serial mediating relationships. The multiple mediation model was analyzed using the bootstrapping method through the PROCESS macro tool in SPSS. The results showed that job stress negatively affects job satisfaction, job commitment, and workers' safety behavior, and the relationship between job stress and safety behavior is mediated by both job satisfaction and job commitment. The serial mediation effects of job satisfaction and job commitment were also found to be statistically significant in the regression relationship between job stress and safety behavior. Further analysis of the compliance and participation subdimensions of safety behavior showed similar results. Specifically, the serial mediation effects of job satisfaction and job commitment on participation and compliance behavior were further supported; however, the mediation effect of job satisfaction was not significant, whereas that of job commitment did remain significant. Further research is needed to determine if the mediation effect of job satisfaction found in this study can be extended and generalized to workers in various fields and industries.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제69권
• /
• pp.523-541
• /
• 2016

According to Chinese Arbitration Law, combination of mediation with arbitration means that in the process of arbitration, arbitrator may conduct mediation proceedings for the case they are handling, provided both parties agree to do so. If mediation succeeds and the parties reach a settlement agreement, the arbitrators may render a consent award or a written mediation statement in accordance with the contents of the settlement agreement. If mediation fails, the arbitration proceedings will be resumed until the case is concluded by making of an arbitral award. There is no formal name of this system in China, it is called "combination of mediation with arbitration", "mediation in arbitration process" or "arbitration-mediation", the author of this thesis select "arbitration-mediation" and make it simply as "Arb-Med". This thesis concentrates on three issues that arbitrators and the parties have to clarify and pay attention to once they choose to use Arb-Med. The first part is about the 'waivable problems', include waive the right to challenge a arbitrator who act as a mediator at the same time with parties' approval, as well as the question about the waiver of the arbitrator's duty to disclose confidential information obtained during mediation. The second part is 'public policy in Arb-Med', introduces the concept of public policy, the bias may arise the complaint about public policy, and the due procedure problem. And the last part is about the award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, especially about the award including some contents which has relation to third party's interests.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.87-116
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 대인 갈등의 특징을 분석하고, 갈등 조정의 서사가 어떠한 특징을 지니고 구성되며, 조정 과정을 거치면서 어떠한 해체 과정을 통해 대안적 이야기로 변화되는지를 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이 과정에서 갈등조정가가 동원하는 커뮤니케이션 기법을 중심으로 수행하는 역할을 밝히려는 것도 또 다른 연구의 목적이 된다. 본 연구를 통해서 포스트모던 이론의 하나인 사회구성주의 관점의 서사적 갈등 조정의 유용성을 확인할 수 있었다. 이야기 구성을 통해 이루어지는 서사적 갈등 조정은 과거의 경험에 대해서 심리 중심으로 접근하는 갈등에 대한 치료적 방식과 함께 미래에 대한 대안을 행위 중심으로 접근한다. 특히 갈등의 문제를 대화로 연결하고, 갈등과 문제의 의미를 공동으로 창조하여 발전시켜 나가는 체계로서의 서사 조정은 인간의 주체성과 갈등의 고유성을 전제하면서 새로운 변화를 추구한다. 이러한 지점이 갈등을 커뮤니케이션의 관점에서 접근해야 한다는 주장에 정당성을 부여한다. 특히 이 과정에서 다양한 커뮤니케이션 기법들이 갈등 조정에 결정적인 효력을 발휘하고 있다는 것은 갈등 현장에서의 조정 전문 분야 중의 하나로 커뮤니케이션학을 정립할 수 있는 핵심적 근거가 될 것으로 예상된다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2001

Parental attitudes and mediation of children's television viewing has focused primarily on broadcast television, although recent developments in technology have greatly expanded the availability of VCRs in home environment. To build a more comprehensive model of parental mediation of TV Viewing in the new video environment, this article analyzed parental attitudes toward children's video viewing and factors associated with parental mediation of children's video viewing using questionnaire responses from 659 mothers of four to six-year-old children. Both restrictive and evaluative parental mediation were associated with not only parental factors but also contextual factors. Descriptive data on parental attitudes and mediation of children's video viewing were also presented.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.149-173
• /
• 2016

This study vindicates similarities and differences of hybrid process of arbitration and mediation between China and Malaysia. Both countries develop hybrid processes combining arbitration with mediation in their own cultural soils. The Chinese dispute resolver plays the dual role of arbitrator and mediator during the proceedings of hybrid process of arbitration and mediation. On the other hand, a different arbitrator plays the role of mediator, if conciliation fails in Malaysia. On the other hand, judges are allowed to act as mediator during the proceeding in China and Malaysia.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.169-208
• /
• 2016

의료분쟁의 해결을 위해 "의료사고 피해구제 및 의료분쟁 조정 등에 관한 법률"이 제정되어 한국의료분쟁조정중재원에서 2012. 4. 8.부터 조정 중재 절차가 시행되었는데, 최근 3개년의 평균 조정절차 개시율은 43%이하로 나타났다. 이에 한국의료분쟁조정중재원은 조정절차 개시율을 높이기 위해 특정 요건에 해당하는 경우 자동개시가 될 수 있는 방안을 고안하였고, 2016. 5. 국회 본회의를 통과하여 같은 달 30.에 공포되었다. 그러나 근본적으로 조정절차 개시율이 오른다고 하더라도, 반드시 현행과 같이 조정성립률이 오를 것이라 단정할 수 없다는 것이다. 오히려 한국의료분쟁조정중재원에서 이와 같은 수치를 높일 계획이라면, 자동개시만이 해법이 아니라 주요 보건의료기관 개설자가 참여하지 않은 근본 이유를 살피고 그에 관한 신뢰를 회복하는 게 주요 과제라할 것이다. 또한 의료인의 안정적인 진료환경을 위해, "의료사고 피해구제 및 의료분쟁 조정 등에 관한 법률" 제51조에서 형법 제268조의 죄 중 업무상과실치사와 단서 조항도 반의사불벌죄가 적용될 수 있도록 개정하여야 한다. 또한 의료기관 개설자나 보건의료인이 대불청구를 할 수 있도록 요건을 신설하는 등 그 외 의료기관의 입장에서, 한국의료분쟁조정 중재원의 조정 절차가 안정적으로 정착할 수 있도록 운영상의 미비에 관하여 제도를 보완할 수 있도록 고언(苦言)한다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.117-144
• /
• 2013

After several bills for the reasonable medical dispute resolution had been proposed for over twenty years, "Act on Remedy for Damage from Medical Accident and Medical Dispute Mediation" was eventually enacted on April 7, 2011 and came into effect from April 8, 2012. This study evaluates the achievements and results of the past year, suggesting the future improvements or tasks. The main issue of Act on Medical Dispute Mediation is Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Therefore, the success of the Act depends on the outcomes of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Although the Act has been enforced for only one year, this paper examines the outcomes of the Agency with limited materials for its development. Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency was established for rapid, fair, and effective medical dispute resolution. Thus, the evaluation of the performances of the Agency is based on the 1) rapidness, 2) fairness, and 3) effectiveness of the dispute resolution. To sum up, the system earned positive evaluations as for the rapidness and fairness, but some problems were indicated with regard to the effectiveness. As the system of medical dispute mediation and arbitration in Korea has no parallel in the world, other countries show many interests in it. The rapid and fair medical dispute resolution is of benefit in both patients and medical institutes and decreases social costs. As the Act had a difficult passage through Parliament, it should be maintained and improved continuously.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.85-116
• /
• 2013

Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency, "K-MEDI" in abbr. herein-after, is established on Apr. 9, 2012 according to the law cited in the title above for the purpose of settling medical disputes in a prompt, fair and efficient manner. Two special professional organizations are established in K-MEDI, one of them is Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Committee(hereinafter referred to as the "Mediation Committee") and the other Medical Malpractice Appraisal Board(hereinaf-ter referred to as the "Appraisal Board"), the mission of the latter is to investigate the facts concerning the disputed medical conduct and to research as to and apprai-se whether the medical conduct was negligent and whether a causal relationship exists. Each panel organized in the Mediation Committee or the Appraisal Board shall be comprised of five mediators or appraisers, including necessarily a judge or a prose-cutor respectively and any disputed case regardless of the scale, the importance or the complicacy shall be handled by a panel. As the system is not thought efficient or economic, the number of the members comprising a panel or total members com-prising the Mediation Committee or the Appraisal Board shoud be adjusted, and the process shoud be versified, including the "Rapid Process," for instance. A petition for the mediation of a medical dispute shall be rejected if the respondent fails to notify K-MEDI of his/her intention to accede to the mediation within 14days from the day on which the petition for the mediation was served(Art. 27 Cl. 7). As the option of an arbitrary decision whether the mediation proceedings shall be commenced or not given to the respondent by the clause is thought unfair, making the process unstable, and moreover, diminishing the purpose of the system established by the law cited above for solving the medical disputes, the clause shoud be amended not to allow the respondent the option of such an arbitrary deci-sion. K-MEDI shall conduct the "Program for Compensation of Medical Accidents"(Art 46) according to which unavoidable injuries caused by the medical accidents in the cour-se of childbirth and the "Advances for Damages"(Art. 47) that are the compensating moneys paid to victims in medical malpractice cases who fail to receive money at all or partly from the operator or the professional of a public health or medical institution although he/she has a final and conclusive right to be paid by them. Some operators or professionals of such institutions claim that both the programs violate their fundamental rights assured by the constitution, and that it be a justifica-tion of refusal to accede to the mediation. As any of the programs needs not to be conducted by K-MEDI, it may be a proper solution to change the conductor of the programs to avoid the unproductive controversy.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제54권3호
• /
• pp.166-172
• /
• 2021

Traditional epidemiological assessments, which mainly focused on evaluating the statistical association between two major components-the exposure and outcome-have recently evolved to ascertain the in-between process, which can explain the underlying causal pathway. Mediation analysis has emerged as a compelling method to disentangle the complex nature of these pathways. The statistical method of mediation analysis has evolved from simple regression analysis to causal mediation analysis, and each amendment refined the underlying mathematical theory and required assumptions. This short guide will introduce the basic statistical framework and assumptions of both traditional and modern mediation analyses, providing examples conducted with real-world data.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제56권4호
• /
• pp.303-311
• /
• 2023

Traditional mediation analysis, which relies on linear regression models, has faced criticism due to its limited suitability for cases involving different types of variables and complex covariates, such as interactions. This can result in unclear definitions of direct and indirect effects. As an alternative, causal mediation analysis using the counterfactual framework has been introduced to provide clearer definitions of direct and indirect effects while allowing for more flexible modeling methods. However, the conceptual understanding of this approach based on the counterfactual framework remains challenging for applied researchers. To address this issue, the present article was written to highlight and illustrate the definitions of causal estimands, including controlled direct effect, natural direct effect, and natural indirect effect, based on the key concept of nested counterfactuals. Furthermore, we recommend using 2 R packages, 'medflex' and 'mediation', to perform causal mediation analysis and provide public health examples. The article also offers caveats and guidelines for accurate interpretation of the results.