• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.211-227
• /
• 2008

수학과 협동학습에서 학생들의 의사소통을 포함한 유기적인 상호과정은 매우 중요하며, 소집단의 구성 방법은 학습 결과에 많은 영향을 미친다. 따라서 수학과 협동학습의 효과를 높이기 위해서는 학습자의 다양한 특성에 따라 소집단이 구성되어야 하며 이때에는 인지적 요인뿐만 아니라 정의적 요인도 신중히 고려되어야 한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 정의적 요인 중, 학생이 어떻게 학습하고 무엇을 학습하는지의 개인차를 나타내주는 성격유형을 협동학습을 위한 소집단 구성의 중요한 기준으로 보고 5학년을 대상으로 MMTIC 검사를 통해 성격유형별 동질집단과 이질집단을 구성하여 소집단 협동학습을 실시하였다. 그 결과 성격유형별 동질집단과 이질집단 간 수학적 태도는 차이를 보이지 않았으나 수학 성취도에 있어서는 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 즉 수학과 소집단 협동학습에서 성격유형별 동질집단 구성이 수학 성취도 향상에 효과적임을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.197-207
• /
• 2007

Based on a survey on 1620 students in primary school and secondary school., by adopting Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), we got the following findings : 1. There is close relationship between emotionality characteristics of temperament and mathematics academic achievement of the subjects at Grade 5 (Primary 5), Grade 8 (Junior Secondary 2), and Grade 10 (Senior Secondary 2). Also there is close relationship between internal-external directivity characteristics of temperament and mathematics academic achievement at Grade 5 and Grade 8. While there is not close relationship between internal-external directivity characteristics of temperament and mathematics academic achievement at Grade 10; 2. There is close relationship between temperament types and mathematics academic achievement of the subjects from the three grades. Superior temperament, which benefit learning mathematics, are sanguine, sanguine-phlegmatic and phlegmatic; While inferior temperament types, which don't benefit learning mathematics, are choleric, melancholic and choleric-melancholic. With the rising of grade, temperament types of benefiting learning mathematics converts from external directivity emotion balance to balance of internal-external directivity emotion stability. While temperament of no benefiting learning mathematics converts from internal directivity emotion balance to balance of internal-external directivity emotion instability; 3. In mathematics education, students' temperament difference, which affects learning mathematics, should be recognized. Mathematics teachers should find out the best teaching ways, forms and methods which are suitable for student's temperament type, so that the students with different temperament types can gain better mathematics academic achievement.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.393-412
• /
• 2018

Teacher quality is a key factor that determines quality of education. Being aware of this, the Korean government and teachers have been striving to improve teachers' professionalism. Research about the impacts of efforts to enhance teacher professionalism on students' academic achievement and course satisfaction, however, is extremely limited. This study sought to advance our understanding of the relationship between these factors by analyzing what teacher characteristics impact students' achievement and satisfaction. To this end, the study drew on the middle and high school data from 3rd to 6th year survey of the Seoul Educational Longitudinal Study. Structural equational modeling were used as the main approach. Latent profile analysis, a kind of mixture modeling analysis, were used as needed. This study found that teachers' participation in instruction enhancement activity and professional development impact students' attitude toward mathematics lessons and their perception on class atmosphere, and ultimately impact their academic achievement as well as their overall satisfaction in the course. In addition, teachers' use of EBS textbooks and videos impact 3rd grade high schoolers' academic achievement. These findings suggest that effort to improve teacher professionalism positively impact students' academic achievement and course satisfaction, although there is a difference according to the year grade. This study provides implications for education policy makers and teacher educators.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 1989

This study compared the effects of open and directed teaching styles on creativity and mathematical achievement. The subjects were 32 three- and four-year-old children enrolled in the Home Economics Laboratory Nursery School at the University of Arkansas during the fall semester of 1987. In this study, the open teaching style was a child-oriented method of teaching with the help or guidance rather than the actual instruction of teacher, while the directed teaching style was a teacher-oriented method of teaching with actual instruction of the teacher. Forty-eight activities and materials relevant to mathematical concepts appropriately designed for the subjects were used. The nursery school children were divided into morning and afternoon groups. Utilizing a Latin square design, the children in the morning group were taught by the directed teaching style for four weeks followed by a three week period of no planned mathematical activities, then taught by the open teaching style for four weeks. The children in the afternoon group followed the same schedule except the open teaching style was first. At the end of the two four-week sessions of mathematics experiences Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement and selected items of Tests of Basic Experiences 2: Mathematics were administered. The scores of each of the two tests were analyzed using a t-test of dependent measures for the two teaching styles, the sex, and the age of the children. Children taught using the directed teaching style showed a significantly higher originality and mathematical achievement scores than those taught using the open teaching style. Differences for sex and age revealed that the directed teaching style was a significantly better method of instruction to foster the originality for boys and the mathematical achievement for four-year-old children.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.125-139
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 교구활용을 강화한 수업이 학업 성취와 수학적 성향 및 태도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 살펴봄으로써 교구활용을 활성화할 수 있는 방안을 모색하는 데 있다. 본 연구에서 실험반과 비교반에 적용한 변수는 교구활용 빈도를 제외하고 기타 수업 환경은 동일에게 적용하였다. 연구 결과 학업 성취도를 t-검정한 결과 사전검사 점수는 두 집단 사이에 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났으나, 사후검사에서는 실험반이 비교반보다 10점 정도(t=0.519, p<0.01) 평균적으로 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또 실험 집단 내에서 교구활용이 학습 수준별 학업 성취에 미치는 효과는 사전점수를 공변인으로 하는 공변량분산분석(ANCOVA)을 실시한 결과 5% 유의수준에서 수준별 차이를 보였으며 (F=4.885, p<0.05), 중 상위 수준의 학생보다 하위 수준의 학생들에게 더 긍정적인 효과를 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.109-124
• /
• 2008

2007년 개정 수학과 교육과정의 특징 중 하나는 단계형 수준별 교육과정을 폐지하고 수준별 수업을 내실화하는 것이다. 수준별 수업의 실제 운영을 위해서는 학생들의 성취수준을 어떤 기준으로 어떻게 판단할 것인가의 문제가 선결되어야 한다. 이를 통해 개별 학생이 어떤 성취수준에 있는지, 그리고 특정 성취수준에 속한 학생은 교육과정에 제시된 각각의 성취기준에 얼마만큼 도달하였는지를 판단할 수 있어야 하고, 이를 토대로 해당 학생의 수준에 부합하는 교육을 제공하여야 할 것이다. 본 논문에서는 수준별 반 편성을 위한 학생들의 성취수준 판단 방법으로서 현행 국가수준 학업성취도 평가에서 활용되고 있는 앙고프 방법(Angoff method)을 소개한다 그리고 성취수준별 대표 문항의 개념 및 수준별 수업에의 활용 방안을 학생들의 성취수준 진단 문제를 중심으로 논의한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.5-11
• /
• 1985

There arc numerous techniques available to appraise pupil achievement in elementary school mathematics. The teacher must utilize a variety of approaches to assess pupil growth in the mathematics curriculum. Each evaluation technique has its strengths as well as weaknesses. Thus, a specific evaluation technique may be utilized as a check on other approaches to appraisal. Pupil achievement must be assessed in terms of stated relevant understandings. skills, and attitudinal objectives. It is not adequate to appraise pupil growth in terms of understandings objectives only. Pupils must also be assessed in terms of skills objectives. The understandings acquired by learners must be utilized; thus, skills objectives need to be stressed adequately in ongoing units of study in elementary school mathematics. Adequate emphasis also needs to be placed upon pupils achieving attitudinal goals. Desireable attitudes on the part of learners aid in achieving understandings and skills objectives. A defensible program of evaluation would then stress that pupil achievement be adequately appraised in terms of understandings, skills, and attitudinal objectives.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.247-270
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to build a model that explains the relationship between and among five variables that are student background, teacher background, home environment, school characteristic, and student mathematics achievement, using structural equation modeling. Another purpose of this study is to compare the relationships of these variables between the United States and Korea in 7th and 8th grades mathematics. Student, teacher, and school background files from population 2 in the TIMSS were selected for this study. The result of the study provides practical information for teachers, parents, school principals, and other people who are interested in improving student achievement, and also provides the information that may explain differences and similarities between the US and Korea in mathematics achievement.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제53권2호
• /
• pp.219-237
• /
• 2014

In this study we desire to deduce implications for mathematics curriculum, teaching- learning, and evaluation from the data of Nation Assessment of Educational Achievement. For this, first we extracted the items written by the same achievement standard over two years from 2010 to 2012. Next we investigated whether the items are the representative items of a certain proficiency level and classified into the case of the items of the same proficiency level and the case of the items of different proficiency levels. Based on these we analysed learning characteristic of the each proficiency level. From the results of the above, we proposed what should be changed in mathematics curriculum, what should be considered in teaching-learning, and what should be paid attention to test item development.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.45-63
• /
• 2022

Multicultural students are a rapidly growing population in South Korea. Previous studies from the South Korean mathematics education community have reported low mathematics achievement levels of this population compared to Korean-born students. However, a systematic literature review was hardly employed. This study aims to synthesize the factors that affect the mathematics achievement of multicultural students to provide directions for future research and practical directions. Using an Opportunity-Propensity framework suggested by Byrnes and Miller, this study analyzed twenty-seven peer-reviewed journal articles on this topic. The results showed that the majority of the studies focused on the impact of the opportunity factors such as mathematics curriculum and teachers on mathematics achievements. We suggest that more studies regarding distal factors (e.g., students' prior achievement) and propensity factors (e.g., prerequisite knowledge) are needed.