• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.17-23
• /
• 1999

Purpose : We intend to review clinical results after Anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendon arthroscopically. Materials & Methods : Sixty two patients who had underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon from Mar. 1996 to Mar. 1997 were reviewed. The average follow-up was 16 months and average age at operation was 27 years old. Clinical results were evaluated with physical examination, Lysholm Knee score and instrumented anterior laxity test with Telos Results : The average preoperative Lysholm knee score was 57.0 and postoperative average of that was 91.8. All cases of 62 patients had normal range of motion of knee and were able to walk with no problems at follow-up. On the Lachmann test, there were mild(+) instability in 24 cases, moderate(++) in 24 cases, severe(+++) in 14 cases preoperatively and 48 cases were converted to negative, 14 cases mild postoperatively. On instrumented anterior laxity test with Telos, difference between normal and affected knee on 20 lb which was 13.4mm preoperatively was decreased to 4.7mm at follow-up and anterior stability was regained(P<0.05). Parapatellar complications such as crepitus in 18 cases(29.5%), atrophy of quadriceps in 23 cases(36.5%) were observed. There were 2 cases of inaccuracy of guide pin of semifix screw intraoperatively and 3 cases of malposition of semifix screw postoperatively. Conclusion : ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon seems to be a effective procedure to establish the stability of knee joint but is technically demanding procedure and leaves some parapatellar complications.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.25 no.3 s.50
• /
• pp.299-310
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study is to know about the positional change of second molar when orthodontic treatment is performed. To know about it, we andlysed cephalogram pre. and post treatment for 54 adult patients who werefinished orthodontic treatment by banding to the first molar and classify them into 4 groups Class I extraction group 15, Class I nonextraction group 12, Class II group 13, class Class III group 14. The following conclusions were obtained : 1. In the extraction group of Class I , mandibular second molar showed less extrusion and mon distal inclination than first moarl. But maxillary second molar showed more or less extrusive and mesial inclination to much the same degree of first molar. 2. Inthe non-extractio group of Class I, mandibular second molar in intrusive to first molar, it showed smilar distal inclination to first molar. But maxillary second molar is extrusive similarly to first molar. 3. In the group of Class II , mandibular second molar is less extrusive than first molar and maxillary second molar is more extrusive than first molar. 4. In the group of Class III, mandibular second molar showed similar extrusion to first molar and more distal inclination than first molar. But maxillary second molar showed less extrusion than first molar. 5. A comparision of the positional change of second molar among groups : The change of distance from FH plane to funcation point of maxillary second molar is the difference between Class I extraction group and Class II group, Class I extraction group and Class III group. The change of maxillary second molar to palatal plane and occlusal plane is the difference between Class I extraction group and Class III group. And the change of distance from mandibular plan to furcation point of mandibular second molar is difference between Class I extraction group and non-extraction group, Class I non-extraction group and Class II group, Class I non-extraction group and Class III group. But the change of angle of mandibular second molar to mandibular plane and occlusal plane is make no difference in among groups.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.169-175
• /
• 2003

Purpose : The purpose was to evaluate the early result of revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods : From August 1997 to February 2002, this report presents the findings of 18 patients who had revision surgery for failed ACL reconstruction. There was an average of 39 $(7\~120)$months from index procedure to the time of revision. Allografts were used in 14 $(78\%)$cases and autografts were used in 4 $(22\%)$cases and the revision procedures were assisted by arthroscopic technique. The majority of chief complaints were instability in 16 $(89\%)$cases. Sixteen $(89\%)$ cases had 1 previous reconstruction, 2 $(11\%)$ cases had 2. Before and after revision, patients were evaluated by Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT 2000, radiographs, Lysholm score and HSS score and subjective satisfaction. Results : Average length of followup was 27 $(12\~60)$months. Preoperatively, all cases were positive in Lachman test and pivot shift test. After revision the majority of cases were negative. Objectively improving stability was confirmed by KT 2000 and all average KT 2000 was 7.75 $(3.5\~12.5)$mm preoperatively and 2.36 $(1.0\~6.0)$mm at final followup. Lysholm score and HSS score were also improved from 72.6 $(66\~77)$ and 72.5 $(68\~78)$ preoperatively to 89.2 $(80\~92)$ and 88.2 $(81\~92)$ at final followup. Most $(89\%)$ of patients were satisfied with their results. The most common causes of failed ACL reconstruction were malposition of femoral tunnel in 11 $(61\%)$cases. Conclusion : Arthroscopic revision ACL surgery with adequate graft for failed ACL reconstruction was successful in objectively and subjectively improving stability. However, considering the most common causes of failure after ACL reconstruction were errors in surgical technique, it is important that the primary ACL reconstruction should be performed with correct surgical technique.