• Title/Summary/Keyword: liver metastases

Search Result 126, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Prognostic and predictive value of liver volume in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases

  • Park, Jun Su;Park, Hee Chul;Choi, Doo Ho;Park, Won;Yu, Jeong Il;Park, Young Suk;Kang, Won Ki;Park, Joon Oh
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • v.32 no.2
    • /
    • pp.77-83
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: To determine the prognostic and predictive value of liver volume in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients received whole liver radiotherapy (WLRT) between January 1997 and June 2013. A total dose of 21 Gy was delivered in 7 fractions. Results: The median survival time after WLRT was 9 weeks. In univariate analysis, performance status, serum albumin and total bilirubin level, liver volume and extrahepatic metastases were associated with survival. The mean liver volume was significantly different between subgroups with and without pain relief (3,097 and 4,739 mL, respectively; p = 0.002). Conclusion: A larger liver volume is a poor prognostic factor for survival and also a negative predictive factor for response to WLRT. If patients who are referred for WLRT have large liver volume, they should be informed of the poor prognosis and should be closely observed during and after WLRT.

Impact of the extent of resection of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases on survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Rugved Kulkarni;Irfan Kabir;James Hodson;Syed Raza;Tahir Shah;Sanjay Pandanaboyana;Bobby V. M. Dasari
    • Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
    • /
    • v.26 no.1
    • /
    • pp.31-39
    • /
    • 2022
  • In patients with neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases (NETLMs), complete resection of both the primary and liver metastases is a potentially curative option. When complete resection is not possible, debulking of the tumour burden has been proposed to prolong survival. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of curative surgery (R0-R1) and debulking surgery (R2) on overall survival (OS) in NETLMs. For the subgroup of R2 resections, outcomes were compared by the degree of hepatic debulking (≥ 90% or ≥ 70%). A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for each study and pooled using a random-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis model. Of 538 articles retrieved, 11 studies (1,729 patients) reported comparisons between curative and debulking surgeries. After pooling these studies, OS was found to be significantly shorter in debulking resections, with an HR of 3.49 (95% confidence interval, 2.70-4.51; p < 0.001). Five studies (654 patients) compared outcomes between ≥ 90% and ≥ 70% hepatic debulking approaches. Whilst these studies reported a tendency for OS and progression-free survival to be shorter in those with a lower degree of debulking, they did not report sufficient data for this to be assessed in a formal meta-analysis. In patients with NETLM, OS following surgical resection is the best to achieve R0-R1 resection. There is also evidence for a progressive reduction in survival benefit with lesser debulking of tumour load.

Endothelial Cell Proliferation and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Primary Colorectal Cancer and Corresponding Liver Metastases

  • Raluca, Balica Amalia;Cimpean, Anca Maria;Cioca, Andreea;Cretu, Octavian;Mederle, Ovidiu;Ciolofan, Alexandru;Gaje, Pusa;Raica, Marius
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • v.16 no.11
    • /
    • pp.4549-4553
    • /
    • 2015
  • Background: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the major causes of cancer death worldwide. Data from the literature indicate differences between the proliferation rate of endothelial cells relative to the morphology growth type, possibly due to origin of specimens (autopsy material, surgery fragments) or quantification methods. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a factor that stimulates the proliferation of endothelial cells. It is expressed in more than 90% of cases of metastatic CRC. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the endothelial cell proliferation and VEGF expression in primary tumors and corresponding liver metastases. Materials and Methods: Our study included 24 recent biopsies of primary tumors and corresponding liver metastases of CRC cases. CD34/Ki67 double immunostaining and RNA scope assay for VEGF were performed. Results: In the primary tumors analysis of VEGFmRNA expression indicated no significant correlation with differentiation grade, proliferative and non-proliferative vessels in the intratumoral and peritumoral areas. In contrast, in the corresponding liver metastases, VEGFmRNA expression significantly correlated with the total number of non-proliferative vessels and total number of vessels. CD34/Ki67 double immunostaining in the cases with poorly differentiated carcinoma indicated a high number of proliferating endothelial cells in the peritumoral area and a low number in the intratumoral area for the primary tumor. Moderately differentiated carcinomas of colon showed no proliferating endothelial cells in the intratumoral area in half of the cases included in the study, for both, primary tumor and liver metastasis. In well differentiated CRCs, in primary tumors, a high proliferation rate of endothelial cells in the intratumoral area and a lower proliferation rate in the peritumoral area were found. A low value was found in corresponding liver metastasis. Conclusions: The absence of proliferative endothelial cells in half of the cases for the primary tumors and liver metastases in moderately differentiated carcinoma suggest a vascular mimicry phenomenon. The mismatch between the total number of vessels and endothelial proliferation in primary tumors indicate that a functional vascular network is already formed or the existence of some mechanisms influenced by other angiogenic factors.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver oligo-recurrence and oligo-progression from various tumors

  • Cha, Yu Jin;Kim, Mi-Sook;Jang, Won-Il;Seo, Young Seok;Cho, Chul Koo;Yoo, Hyung Jun;Paik, Eun Kyung
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • v.35 no.2
    • /
    • pp.172-179
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with liver oligo-recurrence and oligo-progression from various primary tumors. Materials and Methods: Between 2002 and 2013, 72 patients with liver oligo-recurrence (oligo-metastasis with a controlled primary tumor) and oligo-progression (contradictory progression of a few sites of disease despite an overall tumor burden response to therapy) underwent SBRT. Of these, 9 and 8 patients with uncontrollable distant metastases and patients immediate loss to follow-up, respectively, were excluded. The total planning target volume was used to select the SBRT dose (median, 48 Gy; range, 30 to 60 Gy, 3-4 fractions). Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Results: We evaluated 55 patients (77 lesions) treated with SBRT for liver metastases. All patients had controlled primary lesions, and 28 patients had stable lesions at another site (oligo-progression). The most common primary site was the colon (36 patients), followed by the stomach (6 patients) and other sites (13 patients). The 2-year local control and progression-free survival rates were 68% and 22%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 56% and 20%, respectively. The most common adverse events were grade 1-2 fatigue, nausea, and vomiting; no grade ${\geq}3$ toxicities were observed. Univariate analysis revealed that oligo-progression associated with poor survival. Conclusion: SBRT for liver oligo-recurrence and oligo-progression appears safe, with similar local control rates. For liver oligo-progression, criteria are needed to select patients in whom improved overall survival can be expected through SBRT.

Clinicopathologic Features and Difference in Prognosis in Synchronous and Metachronous Hepatic Metastases of Gastric Cancer (동시성 및 이시성 간전이 위암의 임상병리학적 특성 및 예후의 차이)

  • Kim, Jong-Dae;Ha, Tae-Kyung;Kwon, Sung-Joon
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.9 no.3
    • /
    • pp.128-135
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare synchronous and metachronous hepatic metastases in patients with gastric cancer to determine clinicopathologic features and differences in prognosis as a function of the timing of the metastasis and the treatment modality rendered. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer metastatic to the liver and treated at the Hanyang University Hospital between June 1992 and December 2006 were retrospectively analyzed to study the pertinent clinicopathologic features and effect of treatment methods. Results: There was a significant difference with respect to lymphatic (P=0.041) and vascular invasion (P=0.036) in comparing the clinicopathologic features between the patients with synchronous and metachronous hepatic metastases. The 1-year survival rate and median survival time of patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases were 38.9% and 9.2 months in the entire patient cohort, 30.9% and 9.2 months in the synchronous group, and 44.5% and 9.7 months in the metachronus group, respectively (P=0.436). The group of patients undergoing local treatment (such as surgery and radiologic intervention) followed by systemic chemotherapy, the group of patients receiving systemic chemotherapy only, and the untreated group of patients were compared, and there was no difference between the synchronous and metachronous groups. The synchronous and metachronous groups had high survival rates with local treatment. Conclusion: In patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases, there was no difference in prognosis based on the timing of the hepatic metastases. Independent of the timing of hepatic metastasis, aggressive treatment, such as surgery and radiologic intervention, may help improve the prognosis.

  • PDF

Hepatic Resection for Hepatic Metastases from Gastric Adenocarcinoma

  • Baek, Hyoung-Un;Kim, Sang Bum;Cho, Eung-Ho;Jin, Sung-Ho;Yu, Hang Jong;Lee, Jong-Inn;Bang, Ho-Yoon;Lim, Chang-Sup
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.86-92
    • /
    • 2013
  • Purpose: The effects of hepatic resection on patients with metastatic tumors from gastric adenocarcinomas are unclear. Therefore, we analyzed early clinical outcomes in patients who underwent surgical resection for hepatic metastases from gastric adenocarcinomas. Materials and Methods: From January 2003 to December 2010, 1,508 patients with primary gastric cancers underwent curative gastric resections at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital. Of these patients, 12 with liver-only metastases underwent curative hepatic resection. Their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median follow-up period was 12.5 months (range, 1~85 months); no operative mortalities or major complications were observed. Three patients underwent synchronous resections, and 9 underwent metachronous resections. In the latter group, the median interval between gastrectomy and hepatectomy for hepatic metastasis was 10.5 months (range, 5~47 months). The overall 1- and 5-year survival rates of these 12 patients were 65% and 39%, respectively, with a median overall survival of 31.0 months; 2 patients survived for >5 years. Conclusions: Hepatic resection can be a feasible procedure for treating hepatic metastases from gastric adenocarcinomas. Although this study was small and involved only selected cases, the outcomes of the hepatic resections were comparable and long-term (>5 years) survivors were identified. Surgical resection of the liver can be considered a feasible option in managing hepatic metastases from gastric adenocarcinomas.

Comparison of CT Volumetry and RECIST to Predict the Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases (위암 간전이 환자의 반응평가와 생존율 예측을 위한 종양 부피 측정과 RECIST 기준의 비교 연구)

  • Sung Hyun Yu;Seung Joon Choi;HeeYeon Noh;In seon Lee;So Hyun Park; Se Jong Kim
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.82 no.4
    • /
    • pp.876-888
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the diameter and volume of liver metastases on CT images in relation to overall survival and tumor response in patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) treated with chemotherapy. Materials and Methods We recruited 43 patients with GCLM who underwent chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. We performed a three-dimensional quantification of the metastases for each patient. An independent survival analysis using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was performed and compared to volumetric measurements. Overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using Cox proportional hazard ratios following univariate analyses. Results When patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on volumetric criteria, the median overall survival was 23.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.63-38.57] and 7.6 months (95% CI, 3.78-11.42), respectively (p = 0.039). The volumetric analysis and RECIST of the non-progressing and progressing groups showed similar results based on the Kaplan-Meier method (p = 0.006) and the Cox proportional hazard model (p = 0.008). Conclusion Volumetric assessment of liver metastases could be an alternative predictor of overall survival for patients with GCLM treated with chemotherapy.

Survival Outcomes of Liver Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer Cases: A Single-Center Analysis in Turkey

  • Cokmert, Suna;Ellidokuz, Hulya;Demir, Lutfiye;Fuzun, Mehmet;Astarcioglu, Ibrahim;Aslan, Deniz;Yilmaz, Ugur;Oztop, Ilhan
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • v.15 no.13
    • /
    • pp.5195-5200
    • /
    • 2014
  • Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze our series of liver resections for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) to determine prognostic factors affecting survival and to evaluate the potential roles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent metastasectomy for liver metastases due to colorectal cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, 9 Eylul University Hospital between 1996 and 2010 were evaluated in this study. The patients were followed through July 2013. Demographic, perioperative, laboratory, radiological and chemotherapy as well as survival data were obtained by retrospective chart review. Results: In 47 (47.5%) patients, liver metastases were unresectable at initial evaluation; the remaining 52 (52.5%) patients exhibited resectable liver metastases. Simultaneous hepatic resection was applied to 52 (35.4%) patients with synchronous metastasis, whereas 5 (64.5%) patients underwent hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-two patients with metachronous metastasis underwent hepatic resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection was obtained in 79 (79.8%) patients. A second hepatectomy was performed in 22 (23.2%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 85 (85.9%) patients after metastasectomy. The median disease-free and overall survivals after initial metastasectomy were 12 and 37 months, respectively, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates being 46.5%, 24.3% and 17.9%and 92.3%, 59.0% and 39.0%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the primary tumor site, tumor differentiation, resection margin and DFS were independent factors predicting better overall survival. Conclusions: In selected cases, hepatic metastasectomy for mCRC to the liver can result in long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not exert a positive effect on DFS or OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy also did not appear to impact DFS and OS.

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma with Distant Metastases to the Kidney, Adrenal Gland, Skull and Gluteus Maximus Muscle: a Case Report

  • Son, Sang-wook;Lee, Kye-ho;Lee, Jai Hyuen;Myong, Na-Hye;Yoo, Dong-soo
    • Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.66-70
    • /
    • 2016
  • Introduction: Distant metastases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) are reported with the most common sites being the soft tissue of skin, lung, liver, and bone. We report here a very rare case of MEC with multiple metastases to the kidney, adrenal gland, skull and gluteus maximus muscle. Case report: A 63-year-old male patient presented with left-sided headache. Radiologic evaluations including CT and MRI showed ill-defined soft tissue lesion involving the left infratemporal fossa and left sphenoid sinus, and multiple enlarged lymph nodes in neck and mediastinum. PET-CT demonstrated multiple hypermetabolic lesions in and around the left kidney, left adrenal gland, right ischium, right gluteus maximus and skull base. These lesions were confirmed as MEC with multiple metastases through biopsy. Discussion: Only one case of metastasis to the skull has been previously reported, and moreover, there has not been a case of metastatic MEC to the kidney, adrenal gland and gluteus maximus muscle so far in the medical literature. It is important to acknowledge the possibility of every unusual MEC metastases, since the presence of metastasis has statistically significant influence on the survival of MEC.

Incidence of incisional hernia following liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Does the laparoscopic approach reduce the risk? A comparative study

  • Ahmed Hassan;Kalaiyarasi Arujunan;Ali Mohamed;Vickey Katheria;Kevin Ashton;Rami Ahmed;Daren Subar
    • Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
    • /
    • v.28 no.2
    • /
    • pp.155-160
    • /
    • 2024
  • Backgrounds/Aims: No reports to compare incisional hernia (IH) incidence between laparoscopic and open colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resections have previously been made. This is the first comparative study. Methods: Single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent CRLM surgery between January 2011 and December 2018. IH relating to liver surgery was confirmed by computed tomography. Patients were divided into laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) groups. Data collection included age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, steroid intake, history of previous hernia or liver resection, subcutaneous and peri-renal fat thickness, preoperative creatinine and albumin, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, major liver resection, surgical site infection, synchronous presentation, and preoperative chemotherapy. Results: Two hundred and forty-seven patients were included with a mean follow-up period of 41 ± 29 months (mean ± standard deviation). Eighty seven (35%) patients had LLR and 160 patients had OLR. No significant difference in the incidence of IH between LLR and OLR was found at 1 and 3 years, respectively ([10%, 19%] vs. [10%, 19%], p = 0.95). On multivariate analysis, previous hernia history (hazard ratio [HR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-4.86) and subcutaneous fat thickness (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.19-4.13) were independent risk factors. Length of hospital stay was shorter in LLR (6 ± 4 days vs. 10 ± 8 days, p < 0.001), in comparison to OLR. Conclusions: In CRLM, no difference in the incidence of IH between LLR and OLR was found. Previous hernia and subcutaneous fat thickness were risk factors. Further studies are needed to assess modifiable risk factors to develop IH in LLR.