• Title/Summary/Keyword: linguistic preference relation

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

An approach based on the LOWHM and induced LOWHM operators to group decision making under linguistic information

  • Park, Jin-Han;Lee, Bu-Young;Son, Mi-Jung
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.285-291
    • /
    • 2010
  • In this paper, we propose an induced linguistic ordered weighted harmonic mean(ILOWHM) operator. The ILOWHM operator is more general type of aggregation operator, which is based on the LHM and LOWHM operators. Based on the LOWHM and ILOWHM operator, we develop an approach to group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Finally, an application of the approach to group decision making problem with linguistic preference relations is pointed out.

A Study on the Selection of Optimal Candidates for Free Trade Area in Incheon Port using CFPR Method (CFPR 방법을 활용한 인천항 자유무역지역 최적 후보지 선정에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Byung-Hwa;Park, Sung-Hoon;Kim, Hyun-Jin;Yeo, Gi-Tae
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.167-176
    • /
    • 2021
  • Incheon Port urgently requires designation of a free trade zone to pursue development linked with the port hinterland while promoting continuous growth of the port. This study aims to evaluate the optimal location and derive policy implications for the designation of a free trade zone and analyzed factors property divided by groups. This study used the Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation (CFPR) analysis technique to derive a practical construction direction by quantifying and evaluating linguistic measures. As a result, the Incheon New Port hinterland showed the highest location competitiveness among the four candidate areas of Incheon New Port hinterland, Aam Logistics Complex 2, North Port hinterland, and Gyeongin Port hinterland. Among the eight evaluation factors consisting of qualitative and quantitative factors, the Incheon New Port hinterland ranked no. 1 in all the four qualitative factors and one quantitative factor and received the highest total score. Also, Group 1 presented 'possibility to attract tenant companies' as first. Group 2 was 'complex size' and Group 3 was also 'possibility to attract tenant companies'. This study has the implication for suggesting the factors and evaluation structure of Free Trade Zone. Future research requires detailed empirical studies, such as expanding the subject of study or selecting factors that reflect the interests of each group.