• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제24권
• /
• pp.163-187
• /
• 1996

The library catalog is considered an important tool to provide library users with conveniences making a search for necessary information. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to investigate "behaviors and attitudes" of library users in a university library using online and card catalogs together, to compare their distinctions between online and card catalogs and then to bring about reforms for the development of future cataloging, thereby improving the utilization of online catalog and its service expansion. For this, this paper carried out a survey research which was randomly questionaired 280 library users of four universities in Seoul from March 28th to April 16th 1996. Major findings are as follow : 1. Library users tended to use more online catalog(50.0%) than card catalog (21.9%). 2. The main reasons the library users us online catalog were time saving(24.0%), convenience of use(21.3%), multiple searching possibility (16.2%), and the preferences of card catalog were location of library materials(34.6%), time saving(17.5%), Bibliographic information(14.9%). 3. The major access points which library users utilized mostly in their online catalog are title(30.3%), author(29.2%) and subject heading (17.6%), and for card catalog, title(40.5%), author(34.6%) and call no.(11.1%). 4. The methods library users learned to use online catalog are terminal screen(44.7%), online manual(26.1%), and for card catalog, library orientation(42.6%), librarian's help(18.5%). 5. It was shown that library users were not mostly satisfied about their searching results: the users satisfied with online catalog in the order of partly(46.2%), as expected(42.3%), more than expected(10.4%), and with the card catalog in the order of partly(54.6%), as expected(27.3%), more than expected(10.4%). It was found that although library users preferred online catalog more than card catalog, 54.8% of the total catalog users were not satisfied about the search results they have had. 6. The items which library users want to add to online catalog are catalogs of materials other libraries have(41.6%), catalogs of the materials the library has(29.3%), titles of serial articles(17.7%). And the additional services library users want are checking function of loan materials and reservation of materials(15.5%), subject headings(14.5%), more terminals(13.4%), catalog use explanations(12.9%), multiple access points(11.0%), searching function of contents, abstracts, and indexes(9.6%). Considering the fact that library users tend to use more favorably online catalog than card catalog and the trend that library change from card catalog to online catalog, it is strongly recommended to su n.0, pply students with formal and informal training programs for online catalog use.talog use.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제9권
• /
• pp.1-31
• /
• 1982

A library catalog is most important finding tool to a library collection. This tool should be so designed as to enable users to handle with ease and convenience. Library catalog use study is necessary in order to identify the demands made on the catalog by its actual users and to measure the adequacy with which the catalog is meeting these demands. Many major catalog use surveys were performed by means of questionnaire and interview, but these methods are so difficult and perverse that the results of catalog use studies might often be far from scientific precision. The aim of this paper is to seek the guidelines with which one might assist the catalogers in providing an effective library catalog for their patrons. In order to get the first-hand information an actual survey was undertaken on searching behavior at the catalog of Jeonbug National University Library from November 30 to December 5, 1981 and from May 17 to May 22, 1982. The results of the survey can be summarized as follows: 1. Most of the students (79.77%) use the library. 2. Most of the library patrons (74.52%) use the public catalog as the searching tool to the library collection. 3. 67.85% of the catalog users are interested in searching materials written in Korean, Japanese, and Chinese. 4. 72.86% of the catalog users are interested in searching known items at catalog. 5. In known item searching, 49.44% of the catalog users choose title entry. 6. 20.17% of the catalog users are interested subject searching at the catalog. 7. Reference card is not utilized in searching. 8. For the translated items users want double entries in both vernacular and Korean. 9. At current catalog description, author, title, call number, translator, publisher and joint author are useful entry. Edition, author's date of birth and death, illustrative, size of book and bibliographical notes are not much utilized. 10. 55.39% of the catalog user need systematic guidance on how to use the library catalog and collection.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제29권
• /
• pp.281-304
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study is to identify the degree to which the card catalog in a university library serves its users and to provide useful information for the design of conversion from card catalog to online catalog. From August 19th to September 16th 1995, 278 users of Duksung Women's University Library were randomley selected and surveyed in terms of card catalog use, success rate of card searching, and catalog use training received. Major findings are as follows: 1. Taking into considerations the fact that Library users tended to use more heavily oriental card catalog$(61.8\%)$ than western card catalog$(8.3\%)$ or classification card catalog$(26.3\%)$, oriental card catalog should be designed to improve its search function of the catalog. 2. It was found that the university library card catalog was not easy to use by $49.3\%$ of the users of Duksung University Library. 3. One of main reasons why the card catalog is hard to use is that there is no subject card to which users can access for subject searching. Besides, users have difficulties in locating appropriate classification numbers for subjects which users are interested in. 4. When success rate is defined as finding appropriate cards in catalog boxes, the success rate was reported to be $87.0\%$. 5. The major access points of known items which library users utilized mostly were author$(18.3\%)$ and title$(74.5\%)$. 6. In case of translated versions of foreign materials, original author name cards instead of pronounced original name card written in Korean were given to them as access points. $79.9\%$ of library users of Duksung Women's University insisted that both original and pronounced author name writ':en in Korean should be given as access points to foreign authors for the sake of user's convenience. 7. Formal training programs for card catalog use were found not to be sufficient. Small group informal training courses should be offered to users who need to get information for catalog use by library staffs. 8. Considering the trend that orders of access points have been changed from title, author and subject in card catalog to title, keyword, and author in online catalog, the existing card catalog of Duksung Women's University is expected not to meet future users' needs for subject searching unless the funcions of subject searching of catalog is improved.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제9권
• /
• pp.75-98
• /
• 1982

This study attempted at first to find out a more suitable form of catalog to guide library users who need subject approach through a literature survey, secondly to see how and which catalog form is kept by Korean research or special libraries through an analysing questionnaires, and thirdly to evaluate these data and explore the ways to improve the function of classified catalog in Korean research or special libraries. The findings of this study shows that a classified catalog is more desirable form of catalog in research or special libraries in Korea because of the diversity of languages of the literatures needed by researchers, the educational programs for librarians and the problems of subject heading lists. Above mentioned questionnaire survey shows that more than $70\%$ of research or special libraries in Korea uses classified catalogs. However, among those libraries - only $8\%$ has the index of cassified catalog which is prerequisite for the catalog users. This survey also indicates that recently many libraries began or converted classified catalogs to subject catalogs. The writer explains the beginnings or convertings of classified catalog to subject catalog is due to the fact that many libraries do not have the index of a classified catalog which is badly needed by the library users. Based on these findings, writer said that to improve the function of the present classified catalog, it should include it's index to guide the library users who are not familier with the classifing system of the subjects. Through the entire paper, the writer has attempted to develop a point of argument by comparing a classified catalog with a subject catalog. Writer's point is not only a subject catalog using the particular language terms as a communication tool has problems in itself, but also the prevailing of this catalog form in North America is caused by their different situations from ours.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제11권
• /
• pp.45-68
• /
• 1984

The purposes of this study are to understand: 1) the changing process of ancient Chinese Buddhist books catalog with comparison of catalog. 2) the characteristics of current chinese Buddhist books Catalog with analysis of their classification structure. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: 1) The origin of Chinese Buddhist books catalog is the Chongrijungkyongmokrok that was compiled by Doan, however this catalog can not be discovered. 2) The oldest Buddhist books catalog which is available is the Chulsamjangkigib by seungu 3) The Sujungkyongmokrok by Bubkyong, et al. is known as the most reasonable and systematic Buddhist books catalog. 4) The Kaewonsukkyorok which is compiled by Jiseung in Tang dynasty, is evaluated as the most perfect and useful catalog. This catalog had a great effect on the later catalogs. 5) The important current Buddhist books catalogs are the Bingajungsa catalog, the Wangmunsan catalog, the Yukukkyun Catalog, et al., each of them has an own characteristics.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.357-376
• /
• 2007

이 연구는 부산 울산, 경남 지역 23개 대학도서관의 온라인목록 검색시스템을 분석하였다. 이 도서관 목록들의 검색을 위한 자료 유형 구분, 검색을 위한 접근점, 자료검색의 조건들(검색어 조합방식, 검색어 일치방식, 검색의 상세 수준)은 다양하고 서로 달랐다. 이러한 결과와 그 평가를 토대로 온라인목록 검색시스템의 자료 유형 구분, 접근점 종류, 검색조건 표준화를 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.81-110
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 서구문명이 얻은 최초의 도서관 목록으로서 그 가치를 인정받고 있는 Callimachus의 Pinakes 목록에 대한 연구이다. Pinakes 목록은 고대 목록사에서 가장 중요한 위치를 하지하고 있다는 것을 인정하지만 이에 대한 기초자료의 부족 때문에 상세한 연구가 그동안 이루어지지 않았다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 국내외의 자료를 망라적으로 수집하여 Pinakes 목록을 종합적으로 연구하였다. 그 동안 연구부진으로 목록사에서 거의 황무지상태였던 고대 목록사 페이지를 채울 수 있는 토대를 마련하였다고 할 수 있다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2008

본 연구의 목적은 DLS 종합목록의 교과 연계성을 분석하고 강화 방안을 마련하기 위한 것이다. 연계성 평가 기준으로 포괄성, 상세성, 최신성 그리고 소장처를 활용하였다. 그리고 서울지역 사회과의 도서관활용수업 학습주제를 활용하여 이러한 분석기준을 적용하였다. 분석결과 DLS 종합목록은 도서자료 중심의 학습정보를 제공하고 있으며, 정보의 품질을 평가할 수 있는 상세성이 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 온라인 콘텐츠를 통해서 학습 공동체를 만족시키는데도 한계를 보이고 있다. 따라서 교육과정과 목록의 교육적 가치를 이해하고 있는 사서교사를 배치하여 종합목록의 질을 개선하는 것이 중요하다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.139-168
• /
• 2008

Web 2.0기술이 출현함에 따라 도서관 이용자들이 이미 웹상에서 다양한 기능들을 경험하고 있고, 이러한 경험들을 도서관 정보시스템에 요구하고 있다. 이에, 본 연구에서는 Web 2.0개념과 기술 및 Library 2.0, Catalog 2.0(OPAC 2.0) 개념들을 문헌고찰을 통해 이해를 높인다. 그리고 Web 2.0 기술이 적용된 대표 사이트들과 국내외 도서관 사이트를 분석하여 Web 2.0 기술 중 활용도가 높은 기술들을 분석한다. 마지막으로 분석된 내용을 토대로 향후 도서관의 정보시스템이 이용자 중심의 시스템으로 발전하는데 필요한 목록, 검색, 부가서비스 영역에서의 활용방안과 이러한 기술들이 적용됨으로 나타날 수 있는 부작용에 대해서도 함께 제시하였다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.185-214
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 온라인목록의 Open API 기반 일반 검색시스템과 온라인목록의 Open API 기반 메타 검색시스템을 구축하고 두 실험시스템의 사용성을 비교 평가하여 온라인목록의 Open API 기반 메타 검색시스템의 유용성을 밝히고자 하였다. 사용성은 전체적으로 온라인목록의 Open API 기반 일반 검색시스템 보다온라인목록의 Open API 기반 메타 검색시스템이 더 높게 나타났고, 통계적으로유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 국내 도서관들이 인터넷서점, 검색엔진, 웹포털 등에서 공개한 도서검색용 Open API를 통해 제공되는 풍부한 콘텐트를 온라인목록에서 공유하고 활용하면 서지데이터의 확충, 주제접근과 주제검색 능력의 확대, 메타 검색서비스의 확장, 소장도서의 이용가능성 증대, 목록비용의 절감 등에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.