• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.32
• /
• pp.3-27
• /
• 2006

The Pennzoil case and the SME case illustrate the difficulties which originate from inadequate drafting of letters of intent. In both cases the judges had to face the crucial question as to whether or not a given letter of intent had a binding nature; they had in other words to decide whether the wills expressed in such letters still belonged to the pre-contractual stage, or whether their incorporation into a pre-contractual document meant that negotiations were over and binding obligations had already arisen for the parties. In other words, some problems may occur when a party has documented a stage in the negotiations by letters of intent. The letters may well explicitly spell out if, and to what extent, the parties should be bound by what they have already agreed or to carry on negotiations in order to reach the final contract. But if the letters are silent, some problems would arise. Contracting parties are, therefore, well advised to spell out if, and to what extent, they should be bound by such preliminary agreements. Here again, it might be prudent to explicitly set forth that the parties should not be bound until there is a final written contract signed by authorized representatives of the parties but that they shall abstain from such measures which may defeat their stated objective to reach final agreement, e.g. by diminishing the value of performance under the contemplated contract.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.9 s.218
• /
• pp.51-55
• /
• 2008

제출된 입찰서는 대부분 공개적으로 개봉하며, 입찰자의 명칭과 입찰금액이 함께 공표된다. 감리자는 입찰서가 산술적으로 정확한지, 요구된 자재 및 입찰문서의 조건에 부합하는지를 검토하고, 입찰자와 면담 등을 통해 입찰서의 평가를 완료한 후 발주자에게 낙찰(계약)수여에 관해 추천을 한다. 발주자는 낙찰된 입찰자에게 낙찰통지서(Letter of Award) 또는 낙찰(계약)의향서(Letter of Intent)를 발급해 시공자가 작업준비를 할 수 있게 한다. 낙찰통지서를 받은 시공자는 공사이행보증서(Performance Bond) 및 선수금 보증서(Advance Payment Bond)를 제출하고, 입찰보증서(Tender Bond)를 반환 받으며, 계약체결을 완료한다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
• /
• v.102 no.2
• /
• pp.189-197
• /
• 2013

The Cancun Agreements under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change require developing countries aiming to undertake REDD+ activities to develop a national strategy or action plan, addressing the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation, a measurement, reporting and verifying (MRV) system including forest monitoring system, and safeguards to ensure equity and co-benefits for local communities and indigenous peoples, and biodiversity. The Government of Indonesia and the Government of Norway established REDD+ cooperation through signing a 'Letter of Intent' in May, 2010. Indonesia agreed on 'a two year suspension on all new concessions for conversion of peat and natural forest'. In turn, Norway agreed to support Indonesia's REDD+ implementation efforts up to one billion United States dollars. Indonesia's REDD+ national strategy (June, 2012) accepted most of the requests included in the 'Letter of Intent'. The REDD+ national strategy, however, does not reflect requests of the Cancun Agreements which noted identification of the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation and guarantee of real greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Indonesia lays emphasis on Norwegian requests which includes expected financial support rather than the Cancun Agreements which have a weak legally-binding requirements.

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.59.1-59.1
• /
• 2017

The Subaru telescope is a 8.2m optical-infrared telescope operated by National Astronomical Observatory of Japan since 2000. Its wide field observation capability with good image quality makes the telescope one of the best astronomical facilities. We Subaru Telescope is seeking for international partners for the telescope operation to share science observations, future strategy and development. In the course of this effort, EAO and us exchanged a letter of intent on the planning of collaboration on the Subaru operation in this June. I introduce the contents of the Subaru-EAO LOI and the basic concepts of the Subaru international partnership in addition to a brief report of the current status of the observatory.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.10 s.219
• /
• pp.48-50
• /
• 2008

해외건설공사를 성공적으로 수행하기위해서는, 낙찰통보전 낙찰가능시점부터, 현장소장을 비롯한 현장준비팀을 조직 운영하여, 계약서류상의 각종 요구사항, 승인사항, 인 허가사항, 현지법,공법,계약조건, 공정계획, 인원소요계획, 장비소요계획 등을 검토 한다. 또 현장답사 등을 통하여 견적시에 계획되고 작성된 모든 내용을 검토 보완, 수정 및 Update함과 동시에,선발대를 현장에 투입해 발주자로부터 현장을 인수하고 가설공사를 시작하며 조기착공에 서두른다. 단, 현장투입 전 발주자로부터 접수한 Letter of Intent(낙찰/계약의향서)상의 착공관련 조건을 확인하거나 Notice to Proceed(착공지시서)의 접수를 확인해야 한다. 시공자의 입장에서 건설공사의 궁극적인 목표를 이익의 극대화로 볼 때, 공사초기에서의 신속한 동원이야말로 목표달성에 이르는 지름길이며, 발주자 및 감리자로부터 신뢰를 받아 공사 전반에 걸쳐 순조로운 현장운영을 가능케 하는 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2019.07a
• /
• pp.195-198
• /
• 2019

연명의료결정법의 정식 명칭은 '호스피스 완화의료 및 임종 과정에 있는 환자의 연명의료 결정에 관한 법'이다. 이 법은 호스피스 완화의료에 대한 것과 환자의 연명의료 결정에 대한 것을 규정하고 있다. 특히, 후자의 연명의료결정에 관한 부분은 법제정 과정에서 법 종교 의료 윤리 등 다양한 분야에서 논박이 있었지만 2018년 2월 4일부터 시행되고 있다. 법학에서는 이 법이 생명이라는 법익과 관련되어 있어 형사법적, 민사법적으로 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 이 법이 탄생되기 위해 두 번의 변곡점이 있었다. 첫째, 1997년 '보라매병원 사건'에서 의사를 작위에 의한 살인방조죄로 판결한 사건 둘째, 2009년 '김 할머니' 사건에서 회생할 수 없을 경우 가족 등이 진술한 환자 의사에 따라 연명 의료를 중단할 수 있다는 대법원 판결이다. 연명의료결정법은 헌법상 생명권과 자기운명결정권이라는 기본권 충돌이 발생한다. 두 기본권이 서로 상충 할 때에는 어떠한 기본권을 우선해야 하는지가 실질적으로 문제되는데, 이익형량을 통한 규범의 조화로운 해석을 통해 해결해야 한다. 또한 이 법의 흠결과 문제점을 고찰하여 개정작업이 진행되어야 한다.

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.62.1-62.1
• /
• 2010

GMTO(Giant Magellan Telescope Organization) 이사회(Board Meeting)는 GMT의 1세대관측기기 1차 선정을 하였다. 의향서(Letter of Intent)를 제출한 12개 기기 중 9개 기기에 대해 제안서를 받아 과학자문위원회(Science Advisory Committee)에서 과학적 측면(Science), 기술적 측면(Technical), 비용 및 작업범위측면(Cost, scope & management)에서 심사한 결과 6개를 추천하였고 이사회에서 이를 승인하였다. 한국이 참여하는 GMTNIRS를 포함하여 G-CLEF, GMACS, GMTIFS, NIRMOS, TIGER가 선정되었다. 이 기기들은 2010년 4월부터 14개월 동안의 Conceptual Design Study를 거쳐 2011년 하반기에 이중에서 다시 3~4개가 GMT 1세대 관측기기로 최종 선정되어 제작될 예정이다.

• The Southeast Asian review
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.49-92
• /
• 2013

In May 2010, Indonesia and Norway signed a Letter of Intent on "Cooperation on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation(REDD)." In the LoI, Norway agreed to offer Indonesia a sum of USD 1 billion with a view to encourage Indonesia to significantly contribute to the successful implementation of REDD+. On 20 May 2011, correspondingly, Indonesia announced the 2011 'Forest Moratorium' (the Presidential Instruction No. 10/2011) which was valid for the following consecutive two years. By means of the 2011 'Forest Moratorium', Indonesia aimed at significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation, forest degradation and peatland conversion. In so doing, it also sought to improve forest governance. Meanwhile, concerned stakeholders also raised various questions about the effectiveness of the 'Forest Moratorium'. As an extension of the 2011 'Forest Moratorium', Indonesia announced the 2013 'Forest Moratorium'(the Presidential Instruction No. 6/2013) for another two-year period on 13 May 2013. Indonesia's 'Forest Moratorium' is concerned with stakeholders at various levels, who may play a role of significant 'agent' in the process of implementing the 'Forest Moratorium'. This mechanism of the 'Forest Moratorium' should be understood in the light of forest governance. Employing stakeholder approach, therefore, this article attempts to analyze Indonesia's 'Forest Moratorium' in the light of forest governance. In this regard, it analyzes the detailed contents of the 'Forest Moratorium', the process of making the 'Forest Moratorium', current development of the Indicative Moratorium Map for suspension of new concessions on forest land, and contesting views of various stakeholders. At the same time, it also talks about how 'weak' forest governance had influence upon Indonesia's 'Forest Moratorium'. In so doing, this article consequently attempts to evaluate Indonesia's 'Forest Moratorium' and also put it into perspective in terms of improving forest governance. The 2013 'Forest Moratorium' fundamentally represents a radical policy that is designed to suspend new concessions on forest conversion for another two-year period and its detailed contents attempt to reflect on various stakeholders from related industries and environmental NGOs. However, there are challenging factors in the process of implementing the 'Forest Moratorium', that is, 'weak' forest governance and also a discrepancy between forest planning maps designated by central and regional governments. The announcement of the 2013 'Forest Moratorium', as an extension of the 2011 'Forest Moratorium', may functionally strengthen and improve Indonesia's forest governance. However, at the same time, there is a practical limit due to the fact that it is merely a Presidential Instruction that lacks legal binding.