• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2005

비응급상황에 대한 제한적인 구급요청의 거절 및 환자 등의 이송거부로 인한 법적 분쟁으로부터 당해 구급대원을 보호하고 이에 대한 절차를 엄격히 하여 응급환자를 보호하기 위하여 $\ulcorner$구조대 및 구급대 편성$\cdot$운영에 관한 규칙$\lrcorner$이 개정되었다. 이에 대하여 본 논문은 구급대원의 이송거절 거부에 따라 발생할 수 있는 법적 책임으로 응급의료거부죄의 구성요건 해당성을 고찰하고 부작위에 의한 형사책임 및 환자에게 발생한 손해에 대한 국가배상책임의 발생가능성에 대하여 연구하였다. 구급대원을 법적 책임으로부터 보호하기 위해 개정된 규칙의 준수에 있어서 유의해야 할 점과 외국의 판례들을 고려하여 법원의 태도를 살펴보았다. 결론적으로는 구급대원의 법적인 보호를 위해 지도의사의 의료지도 확보 및 적법한 절차를 따라 문서화된 서식을 충실히 기록함으로써 구급대원의 의무에 대한 충실한 이행 및 환자의 동의를 확보하여 이송거절 및 거부에 대한 정당성을 확보하는 것이 중요함을 강조하였다.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.304-316
• /
• 2021

Objectives: By comparing and analyzing the legal system for risk assessment in South Korea with other advanced countries, the study is designed to identify the key elements of risk assessment and seek improvement measures while focusing on solutions to the execution of risk assessment violations. Methods: The study started with an awareness of the need to improve the legislation on the risk assessment of businesses in Korea. In order to reflect this problem consciousness in Korea's industrial safety and health legislation, risk assessment legislation in Japan, Britain, Germany, and Korea was analyzed in comparative terms through the literature. Results: Unlike the other advanced countries, the concept of risk assessment is defined in Korea in a broad sense that includes measures to reduce risk, and risk assessment in the manufacturing and design stages is not institutionalized. In the case of worker participation, there is a problem regarding effectiveness. It is problematic that compared to the other foreign countries there is a possibility that general risk assessment will be neutralized because it is recognized as a uniform general risk assessment for a particular risk assessment, as well as inadequate risk assessment. Conclusions: The areas diagnosed with problems compared to the legislation in other advanced countries should be improved by revising laws and administrative rules and supplementing the explanatory guidelines, etc. by referring to the legislation of these countries. In particular, the issue of enforcement for violations of risk assessment must be improved in order to ensure the effectiveness of risk assessment.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.51-70
• /
• 2021

Chinese courts seem to be indifferent or ignorant of truncated arbitration. In other words, the Chinese court canceled the arbitration award made by truncated arbitration except for the Pingdingsan Case among the four arbitration cases related to the domestic arbitration award reviewed in this paper on the ground that it violated the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration procedure. A Chinese court has canceled the arbitration award by judging only based on the composition of the arbitral tribunal and the legal process of the violation of the arbitration procedure not by determining whether the domestic arbitration award made by the truncated arbitration meets the conditions for the application of truncated arbitration as stipulated in the Arbitration Rules. Moreover, it seems that the Chinese court made a serious error in the application of the relevant regulations in the Pingdingsan Case, which ruled that the truncated arbitration did not violate the legal process. In this case, the Chinese court admitted truncated arbitration under logic process that it was not necessary to wait until the final hearing to apply the truncated arbitraion because one arbitrator was absent before the final hearing, but the truncated arbitrator had already formed his/her opinion before the absence. However, in the case of Marshall Investment Corporation, a case related to foreign arbitration, the Chinese court rejected the approval and execution of the truncated arbitration award by strictly applying the laws and timing of the truncated arbitration. Since only one case has been identified in the main text, it is difficult to make a definitive judgment, but considering these cases, it seems to be that the Chinese courts apply different standards to domestic and foreign arbitration awards to determine the legality of truncated arbitration.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.163-207
• /
• 2020

우리나라의 임상시험은 최근 10년간 그 규모가 성장하여 임상시험 산업의 주요 국가로 자리매김 하였다. 임상시험은 의료수준의 발전 및 치료 가능성의 확대를 위해 중요한 의미를 지니고 있다. 그러나 임상시험은 의약품 등의 안전성과 유효성을 증명하기 위한 것으로서 본질적으로 위험성을 내포하고 있으므로, 적절히 통제되어야만 임상시험대상자의 건강과 자기결정권이라는 법익을 보호할 수 있다. 이를 위해 임상시험을 수행하는 의사의 선관주의의무 이행이 특히 중요하다. 약사법과 그 하위법령은 시험자인 의사가 준수하여야 할 여러 의무를 규정하고 있다. 이 중 대상자 보호의무와 설명의무는 의사의 임상시험대상자에 대한 주된 선관주의의무를 구성한다. 이는 통상적인 의사의 진료행위에 있어서의 주의의무 및 설명의무와도 본질적으로 그 보호법익과 내용이 유사하다. 임상시험의 경우 통상적인 진료행위의 경우보다 가중된 설명의무가 요구된다. 임상시험에서의 구체적인 주의의무 기준 설정은 향후 판결과 연구를 통해 이루어져야 할 것이나. 주의의무의 기준을 막연히 높이거나 입증책임을 전환하는 등으로 임상시험을 수행하는 의사의 책임을 가중시킬 경우, 자칫 임상시험의 발전 및 환자의 새로운 치료법에 대한 접근성을 저해하고 손해의 공평·타당한 분담이라는 원칙에 위배될 우려가 있다. 이러한 의무들 외에도 임상시험에 대한 법령은 의사에 대해 여러 의무를 규정하고 있는바, 이러한 법령의 위반이 선관주의의무 위반에 해당함으로써 손해배상책임이 인정되는지의 문제는 해당 법령이 부수적으로라도 임상시험대상자의 안전과 이익을 보호하기 위한 것인지 여부, 대상자의 법익 침해의 유무와 정도, 법령위배행위의 태양 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 판단하여야 한다. 이와 같은 여러 의무의 충실한 준수가 이루어지도록 담보하고, 구체적 사안에서 임상시험대상자의 법익이 적절히 보호되었는지에 대해 사법(司法)적, 행정적 통제를 함으로써 법익 보호를 효과적으로 담보할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘텐츠학회 2006년도 추계 종합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.443-446
• /
• 2006

RFID는 유비쿼터스 환경 구현의 핵심으로서 향후 관련 산업의 활성화와 고용 창출 등을 통한 경제적 효과 제고 및 국민 생활의 패러다임 변화를 통한 사회적 투명성 향상 등으로 이어질 것으로 기대되기도 하지만, 점검되지 않은 RFID의 사용으로 전례 없이 방대한 정보를 소매업자에게 수집케 하고 그것을 고객정보데이터베이스에 링크시킴으로써 개인(소비자)의 프라이버시를 짓밟는 결과를 낳을 것이라는 우려의 목소리도 만만치 않은 상황이다. RFID시스템이 사회적으로 확산되고 있음에도 프라이버시 침해의 위협으로부터 개인을 보호해 줄 수 있는 법적 제도의 정비는 이루어지지 않고 있다. 본 논문에서는 RFID와 관련하여 발생할 수 있는 사례를 중심으로 개인의 프라이버시 침해 문제를 법적 관점에서 고찰해보고자 한다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.59-80
• /
• 2014

The Medical Affairs Law regulates that Medical Doctor and Korean Medical Doctor(KMD) can practice in the boundary of each licence. But there is no clear provision to explain what practice in the boundary of MD's permitted region and what is KMD's. Moreover practice over the boundary of licence could be punished as a violation of the Law. KMD's use of medical devices have been objects of legal conflicts in the field. Because there is no clear provision in the Law, judical precedents have played the role as practical and final regulations. In this study, analyses on some judical precedents could show some rationales whether an issued KMD's use of medical devices is in the boundary of license. The courts considered the theories based on the practice, the level of required specialty and education, and the probability of danger to a patient. The judical precedents should be reviewed more precisely in the respects that it is adaptable in "the written law system"and it is desirable to divide boundaries between MD's and KMD's.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.39-50
• /
• 2012

With the obligation of information system supervision and an increase in supervision demands, the quality improvement in information system supervision has been of significance, and the supervision system has been enhanced in the way of preventing information systems from being poorly established. In the meantime, recently the supervision industry has received administrative punishment due to violation of supervision guidelines and false reports. As a result, the introduction of the responsible supervision of information systems to strengthen the rights and duties of supervisors and supervision corporations has been discussed by supervision corporations. Therefore, this work was intended to propose success factors to introduce responsible supervision in the information system supervision sector, and thereby contribute to the introduction of responsible supervision system that plays a successful role in preventing poor supervision and establishing information system business. The success factors of the responsible supervision of information systems, proposed in this work, were categorized into legal system, standardization of supervision work, those concerned with supervision. And, detailed success factors of each category were proposed, and on the basis of that, the success model to introduce responsible supervision successfully was proposed.

• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.169-186
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the data from public information disclosure about pre-hospital advanced airway management and identify the problem by considering domestic laws and guidelines. Methods: Data were collected between 2017 and 2018 and analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Then, the problems of the analysis results based on the relevant laws and practical guidelines were reviewed. Results: The review of domestic laws and practice guidelines revealed that ambulance nurses can implement supraglottic airway device only under the following three conditions: ① smart advanced life support pilot project area, ② trained to insert I-Gel, and ③ member of a special ambulance. In total, 21,574 cases of advanced airway management (endotracheal intubation: 2,428, I-Gel: 18,502, LMA : 499, KING AIRWAY: 144) were reported. In many cases, advanced airway management was performed by ambulance nurses who did not meet the above conditions, which was in violation of laws and guidelines. In addition, the prognosis of intubated patients was not followed up. Conclusion: The Korea National Fire Agency must stop all unlicensed medical practice by untrained, uneducated, and uncertified nurses and demand quality control programs for intubated patients.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.179-214
• /
• 2012

There are two opinions on the legal characteristics of damages for non-pecuniary loss, a private sanctions theory and complementary function of damages for non-pecuniary loss, briefly. There is a close connection between the legal characteristics and the function of damages for non-pecuniary loss. The functions of damages for non-pecuniary loss are consist of satisfaction, prevention( sanctions) and complementation. Several cases of medical injury relief reported to Korea Comsumer Agency are categorized as follows, 1) cases of death after having an operation, 2) diagnosed with disability after a medical accident, 3) extended damages happening related to delayed diagnosis, 4) et cetera(a plastic surgery, a treatment with oriental medicine), and the damages for non-pecuniary loss in respect to each cases are examined. In the case of occurring death or disability, Korea Comsumer Agency has set up guidelines for assessment of damages for non-pecuniary loss by classifying into major and collateral violation for a duty of care. Furthermore, the damages for non-pecuniary loss in the case of all sorts of cancers, are assessed in accordance with the degree of responsibility subsequent to dividing cancer into good and poor prognosis. When it comes to a complementary function of damages for non-pecuniary loss in the actual work, it is hard to assess the damages as it is difficult to objectify non-pecuniary loss, such as emotional distress. Though compensation for damages is major legal characteristics of consolation money, preventing a damage(private sanctions) through consolation for a victim or sanctions against an assailant also has great significance. Therefore, it is necessary to approach flexibly for mutual agreement by considering specialty( concrete facts) of individual issue thoroughly. If considering this aging society that limits the possible age for work to 60 years old, it is needed to have a complementary function of consolation money in mind not to make it less meaningful for victims due to small sum of consolation money.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.123-163
• /
• 2014

As results of analyzing judicial precedents about infection in hospitals in connection with mistakes and causality in medical litigations shows that the Mitigation of Law Principles To Prove responsibility in medical litigation has not been able to play its role compared to its intended purposes. And Major sentiment from those judgments is that a mistake can't be proved only by the fact that certain infection in hospital occurred in connection with hospital infection. Therefore, the number of indirect facts to deny estimation is overwhelmingly high. Like this, especially for hospital infection which is difficult to prove indirect facts themselves to estimate mistake, major sentiment from those judgments have a problem that impute sharing of losses caused by hospital infection to patient. In accordance with the Principles of equitable and proper sharing of losses, it's required to prepare legal interpretation and theoretical methods to largely mitigate patient's responsibility to prove medical mistakes compared to other medical litigations in connection with existing Mitigation of Law Principles To Prove responsibility and conventional theory of estimation. In connection with this, the results of review that duty of safety management in hospital infection cases can be the base of conversion of proving responsibility, the duty that prevent hospital infection, corresponding the duty of safety management in hospital infection is not conventional duty of safety management based on duty of good faith but secondary obligation of medical contract. The breach of duty preventing hospital infection is the violation of medical contract, but there is no logical necessity that convert proving responsibility from the obligation of contract itself. Therefore, the duty of preventing hospital infection from the obligation of medical contract, corresponding the duty of safety management in hospital infection cases cannot be the base of conversion of proving responsibility alone. But, it's still required to conversion of proving responsibility in hospital infection, we need further studies on cases of Germany which applies legal estimation of proving responsibilities in hospital infection.