• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권11호
• /
• pp.199-203
• /
• 2022

The article aims at studying the institution of human rights and civil freedoms with due regard to the anthropological approach in the theory of law. To the greatest extent, the provisions of non-classical legal science are confirmed in the Anglo-Saxon legal family, which endows the judge with law-making functions. In this regard, the role of a person in the legal sphere is increasing. The main research method was deduction used to study the anthropological approach to the institution of human rights and freedoms. The article also utilizes the inductive method, the method of systematic scientific analysis, comparative legal and historical methods. To solve the task set, the authors considered the legal foundations and features of human rights and freedoms in the modern world. The article proves that the classical legal discourse, represented by various types of interpretation, reduces the rule of law to the analysis of its logical structure and does not answer the questions posed. It is concluded that the prerequisite for the anthropological approach in the theory of law is the use of human-like concepts in modern legislation (guilt, justice, peculiar ferocity, child abuse, willful evasion, conscientiousness).

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제6권12호
• /
• pp.587-594
• /
• 2016

주요 인공지능 기술 선진국에서는 인공지능으로 운행하는 자율주행 자동차가 이미 실험 단계의 수준을 넘어섰다. 운전자가 없이 운행하는 자율주행 자동차에서 가장 큰 문제 가운데 하나는, 사고 발생과 그 사고에 대한 책임 문제이다. 운전자와 보행자 모두를 함께 고려해야 하는 사고 상황에서 자율주행 자동차는 윤리적 딜레마에 부딪힐 수 있다. 이런 딜레마를 해결할 최선의 판단이 자율자동차의 인공지능에 어떻게 설계되어야 하는지 물을 수 있다. 책임의 주체로서 자율주행 자동차에 대해 법적 책임을 어떻게 부여할 수 있는지는 어려운 문제이다. 필자는 우선, 사고 상황에서 자율자동차의 윤리적 딜레마가 무엇인지 소개한다. 다음으로, 사고에 대한 책임의 주체로서 자율주행 자동차에 법적 책임을 부여할 방법을 찾는다. 특별히 인과적 책임에 대한 상당성 개념으로 자율주행 자동차 사고의 법적 책임을 해명할 방법을 모색한다. 상당성은 법적 판단에서 인과적 책임을 해명하는 데에 가장 일반적으로 수용하는 개념이다. 그러나 여전히 해명이 필요한 모호한 개념이다. 필자는 사건 수준의 인과에 대한 확률 이론으로 보다 명료한 인과적 책임에 대한 상당성 개념을 제시한다. 이처럼 해명된 상당성은 자율주행 자동차뿐 아니라 일반적인 영역의 법적 판단에서 요구되는 인과적 책임을 설명하는 데에 기여할 수 있다.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.111-127
• /
• 2004

In this paper we describe an application of the lexical resource JurWordNet and of the Core Legal Ontology as a descriptive vocabulary for modeling legal domains. It can be viewed as the semantic component of a global standardisation framework for digital governments. A content description model provides a repository of structured knowledge aimed at supporting the semantic interoperability between sectors of Public Administration and the communication processes towards citizen. Specific conceptual models built from this base will act as a cognitive interface able to cope with specific digital government issues and to improve the interaction between citizen and Public Bodies. As a Case study, the representation of the click-on licences for re-using Public Sector Information is presented.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.133-157
• /
• 2014

To confirm the division of the scope of sports arbitration, the English sports arbitration system will be analyzed as well as the scope of the regulations of the international sports arbitration court. If these forms of sport arbitration are combined with the existing China legal system and sports systems, they will effectively deal with the procedures of sports arbitration and of their linked programs, and clarify the nature of sports arbitration. With regard to the judicial supervision mode, domestic scholars have two theoretical perspectives, "comprehensive supervision theory" and "program supervision theory". Based on analyzing the above theories, the author believes that the opposition between the two is not absolute, as both can reach agreement on the important issue of whether to conduct substantive court examination or not under the premise of party autonomy.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.129-136
• /
• 2022

Objectives: Given the real problems at industrial sites related to the Serious Accident Punishment Act (SAPA), it has become controversial as a particularly important issue in terms of occupational safety and health. I intend to examine in detail what are the problems and how to approach them. Methods: The contents of SAPA were reviewed focusing on whether its provisions conform to the principles of occupational safety and health, whether they fit the related legal theory, and whether they are effective for accident prevention. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is a problem with SAPA from the perspective of the effectiveness of accident prevention by combining occupational safety & health management theory, and legal theory. Results: In order to ensure the effectiveness of SAPA, it should be revised to increase the predictability and implementation of safety and health measure standards. Otherwise, it is expected that there will be not only economic and social costs in the short term, but also side effects that disrupt the safety law system, resulting in a considerable number of post-mortem conditions in the mid- to long term. Conclusions: It is easy to see in comparative law that raising the legal punishment alone does not have the effect of preventing industrial accidents. SAPA should be revised as soon as possible in the direction of faithfully and elaborately reorganizing the standards for safety and health measures.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.185-212
• /
• 2013

In this paper, a conceptual model of legal culture based on Ehrlich's "living law" theory and Cole's social-cultural explanation can explain the low utilization rates of arbitration of Japan and the high utilization rates of arbitration in the United States, simultaneously. This model highlights the clash between social norms and legal provisions in Japan. Japan has developed a two-tiered system of dispute resolution. At the official level, Japanese people accept the legal system imposed by the outside world. But, at a deeper level, they utilize diverse forms of informal dispute resolution mechanisms, such as reconcilement and conciliation, reflecting their own social norms. In contrast, there is no conflict between social norms and legal provisions in United States. This study may show that there are distinctions between American-style arbitration and Japanese-style arbitration, reflecting their own respective social norms. The question of reconciliation between the American style of arbitration and the Japanese style of arbitration can be resolved by an international arbitrator.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.81-88
• /
• 2019

Based on the theory of planned behavior and the theory of legal deterrence, this study takes consumers' willingness to pay for digital music as the research object, investigates the consumers who have digital music consumption channels and behaviors, and discusses the willingness of consumers to pay for digital music and its influencing factors. The study attempts to achieve the following research purposes: First, explore the influencing factors of willingness to pay for digital music using domestic and foreign literature research and related content analysis. Second, we want to examine the effect of Attitude, Collective Specifications, Quality Sensitivity and Music affinity on willingness to pay. Third, Legal deterrence and resource availability tries to verify whether there is a moderating effect between Attitude, Collective Specifications, Quality Sensitivity and Music affinity and willingness to pay. The research data was collected in 2019 between April 6th to May 8th. Questionnaires were randomly distributed in fixed places, mainly in Hubei Province, China. A total of 393 questionnaires were selected for data analysis. Based on the previous theoretical review and empirical analysis, the study draws the following conclusions: Firstly, attitude, collective specifications, quality sensitivity and music affinity have an impact on the willingness to pay. Second, Legal deterrence has a regulatory effect on the relationship among quality sensitivity, musical affinity and the willingness to pay. Last the resource availability has a significant impact on the willingness to pay. It also has a regulatory effect on the relationship among quality sensitivity, music affinity and the willingness to pay.

• 철학연구
• /
• 제147권
• /
• pp.333-356
• /
• 2018

상앙은 전기법가를 대표하는 인물로서 후일 한비자에게 사상적인 영향을 미쳤을 뿐만 아니라 변방의 약소국이던 진나라를 일약 신흥 강대국의 반열에 올려놓음으로써 진시황이 천하통일의 대업을 이루는데 초석을 놓은 인물이다. 그는 특히 법을 중시하여 법가의 법치사상에 대한 이론적 틀을 체계적으로 정립하는데 기여한 인물로서 주목되는 인물이다. 이 글은 먼저 상앙의 법치사상의 선결 요건에 해당하는 변법시행의 내용을 역사 기록물에서 살펴봄으로써, 상앙이 두 차례에 걸친 변법을 성공적으로 완수해낸 사실과, 변법의 목표가 천하통일을 위한 부국강병을 목표로 수행된 것임을 확인한다. 또한 이 글은 상앙의 법치사상이 법의 권위와 군주의 권능을 일원화해 나아가기 위한 구체적인 단계행정을 밟아나가고 있다는 점에 주목한다. 이 글은 특히 서구의 사회정치적 규범이론에서 제시한 규범 3단계설을 상앙의 법치사상에 적용하여 그 특성과 의의를 명시적으로 검토해보는데 초점이 맞추어진다. 이른바 사회정치적 규범은 발생, 단계적 확산, 내부화라는 3단계를 거치는데, 이 글은 상앙의 법치사상 역시 이와 같은 3단계의 과정을 거쳐 구체화되었음을 살펴본다. 요컨대 이 글은 상앙의 법치사상이 발생론적 선택 규범주의, 엄형을 통한 군주 전제주의, 부국강병을 위한 내부적 군국주의라는 단계를 거쳐 점차적으로 체계화되고 있음을 논의한 결과물이다. 상앙 법치사상의 내용들이 사회정치적 규범의 3단계설에 각각 대응하여 개별적 의의를 생산해내고 있다는 점을 밝히는 것이야말로 이 글의 독자적 고유성이라고 할 수 있다. 이러한 맥락적인 검토를 통해 상앙 법치사상의 체계와 의의가 보다 명료하게 확인될 수 있을 것이라는 것이 이 글의 취지이다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제56권1호
• /
• pp.253-275
• /
• 2022

Niklas Luhmann은 사회학 이론가들 중 가장 논쟁적이고 난해한 학자이면서 동시에 근 10년간 후속연구가 증가하고 있는 학자이다. 이 연구의 목적은 Luhmann의 후속연구들이 Luhmann의 난해한 개념을 어떻게 사용하고 있는지를 관찰하는 것이다. 이 연구는 선행연구와 달리 분석의 단위를 논문이 아니라 키워드로 채택하였다. 키워드는 개념을 관찰 가능하게 만드는 언어적 구성물이기 때문이다. Web of Science의 검색결과 나온 139편의 사회과학 분야 논문의 키워드를 동시출현빈도 분석하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가장 중요한 키워드가 Luhmann의 이름과 이론의 이름이었다. 둘째, 클러스터링은 사회적 체계 이론, 일반체계이론, 법 체계와 정치체계, Luhmann 이론의 사회이론적 의의 등 4가지로 묶였다. 셋째, 핵심어가 'systems theory(일반체계이론)', 'communication(소통)', 'Autopoiesis(자기생산)', 'risk(위험)', 'legal system(법 체계)', 'functional differentiation(기능적 분화)', 'environment(환경)', 'social theory(사회적 이론)', 'sociological theory(사회학적 이론)', 'structural coupling(구조적 연결)', 'systems(체계들)', 'evolution(진화)'로 도출되었다. 이 연구의 의의는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 핵심어를 도출해내 Luhmann의 이론을 처음 접근하는 사람들에게 유용한 접근점을 제공하였다. 둘째, 난해한 이론적 연구의 동향 분석에도 키워드 네트워크를 통한 내용분석이 가능함을 증명하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.47-66
• /
• 2020

Due to the division of China's departmental laws, the disconnect between theory and practice, and the influence of traditional academic thinking on the understanding of the knowledge structure of arbitration legal talents in practice, the construction of law school colleges, teaching teams, and research centers mostly revolves around departmental laws, tearing the connection of the arbitration legal system. The student-centered, process-guaranteed, and result-oriented arbitration master of law training model is "virtualized," the shaping of arbitration professionalism is ignored, the coverage of practical teaching is narrowed, and the arbitration legal profession is mostly formalized. The prevalence of specialized curriculum systems shortage, single faculty, formalized practical teaching, outdated curriculum settings, unsuitable curriculum system design for development, and inaccurate professional curriculum standards and positioning renders it difficult to integrate the "Belt and Road." The cutting-edge, the latest research results, and practical experience cannot reflect the connotation, goals, and requirements of "Entrepreneurship" education, as well as arbitral issues such as the ineffective monitoring of practical education and the inconsistent evaluation of standards and scales. Under the background of the "Belt and Road," based on system theory and practice and through training goals that innovate and initiate organizational form, activity content, management characteristics, assessment and support conditions, etc., the arbitration law teaching curriculum system is gradually improved and integrated. Through the establishment of a "Belt and Road" arbitration case file database and other measures, a complete arbitration law theory and practice teaching guarantee system has been established. Third parties are introduced, arbitration law experimental modules are developed, students are guided how to discover new knowledge, new contents are mastered, solidarity, cooperation, and problem-solving capabilities are cultivated in the practice of the "Belt and Road," and quality education, vocational education, and innovation education are organically integrated. In order to implement the requirements of arbitration law education, innovation development and collaborative management of arbitration law teaching practice base should be cultivated, thus giving full play to the effect of collaborative education between universities and arbitration institutions.