• 무역학회지
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.69-86
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 1999년부터 2013년까지 300개 개별상품의 소매가격자료를 사용하여 원유가격이 가격분산에 미치는 영향을 분석한다. 실증분석 결과에 따르면 원유가격 상승은 미국내 도시 간 가격분산은 증가시키는 반면, World, OECD 등 국가 간 가격분산에는 유의미한 영향을 미치는 않는 것으로 추정된다. 이는 국내 지역 간 차익거래가 원유가격 변화에 따른 수송비용의 변화에 민감하게 반응하는 반면, 국가 간 가격분산은 소득 격차 및 소비자 선호 등 기타 요인에 의해 주로 결정된다는 것을 의미한다.

• East Asian Economic Review
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.427-445
• /
• 2016

We review research using departures from the law of one price to measure the advent of globalization in Europe and Asia. In an application, we then study the role of distance and time in statistically explaining price dispersion across 32 Swedish towns for 19 commodities from 1732 to 1914. The resulting large number of relative prices (502,689) allows precise estimation of distance and time effects, and their interaction. We find an effect of distance that declines significantly over time, beginning in the 18th century, well before the arrival of canals, the telegraph, or the railway.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제16권
• /
• pp.59-81
• /
• 2001

There are two methods of quantifying the damages when the contract is avoided. One is 'concret' assessment, the other is 'abstract' assessment. The former looks to the actual cost incurred by the aggrieved party in concluding a contract for the substitute transaction, while the latter is based on the market price. The concrete method of assessment forms the starting point in the Civil Law systems. In the Common Law systems, it is likewise available. The aggrieved party is entitled to recover the difference between the cost of cover or (as the case may be) the proceeds of resale and the contract price. Both systems also recognize the abstract method of assessment. If the aggrieved party does not resell or cover, damages are equal to the difference between the price fixed by the contract and the market price. The CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles recognize expressly both concrete and abstract methods. Under the relevant articles, the aggrieved party can recover the damages assessed by one of the methods as well as any further damages such as loss of profit, incidental and consequential damages.

• East Asian Economic Review
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.249-272
• /
• 2012

This paper examines how a Korean automobile firm price-discriminates between the Korean and the U.S. markets. We argue that a Korean automobile firm's pricing behavior depends on the differences in price elasticity over the segmented markets between the countries. Our findings are that differences in price elasticity may help explain why a medium-class car's price is higher in Korea than that in the U.S. while a small-sized car's price is higher in the U.S. than in Korea, which implies that a Korean automobile firm $3^{rd}$ degree price-discriminates on the same or similar products between Korea and the U.S. This type of $3^{rd}$ degree price discrimination differs from a typical home-bias effect (charging higher prices to domestic consumers) because a small-sized car which is produced domestically sells at higher price abroad. This finding can be added as a source that violates the law of one price.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제89권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2000

본 연구(硏究)는 Johansen 공적분(共積分) 분석(分析) (cointegration analysis)을 이용하여 캐나다 (Canada) 내(內)의 5개 지역(地域) (Atlantic, Quebec, Ontario, Prairie, British Columbia) 침엽수(針葉樹) 제재(製材) (softwood lumber) 가격(價格)의 일가(一價)의 원칙(原則) (law of one price)이 성립하는지 구명(究明)하는데 그 목적(目的)이 있다. 1987년 10월부터 1998년 11월까지의 월간(月刊) 시계열자료를 이용하였으며 단위근(單位根) 검증법(檢證法) 중 가장 많이 사용되는 Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) 검증법을 이용한 결과 연구에 이용된 모든 수준변수 (level variables)들은 불안정적(不安定的) (non-stationary)이지만 차분변수 (differenced variable)들은 안정적이므로 공적분 분석의 선결조건(先決條件)이 만족되었다. Johansen 공적분 분석결과 캐나다 (Canada) 내(內)의 5개 지역(地域) 침엽수(針葉樹) 제재가격(製材價格)의 일가(一價)의 원칙(原則) (law of one price)이 성립되는 것으로 나타났다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제69권
• /
• pp.45-62
• /
• 2016

Price reduction under CISG Art. 50 is advantageous to a buyer because it is a self-help remedy to the buyer. It is the buyer that has the option and the power to reduce the price paid or to be paid to the seller. Price reduction is indispensable in such cases where the seller is relieved of liability. In such cases the remedy of price reduction is the only one giving the buyer monetary relief. Another special role of price reduction is to determine how much the buyer owes the seller for non-conforming goods when special circumstances relieve the seller of liability for damages. In any event, price reduction has been designed both as an alternative to damages and for cases where the non-performing party is excused from liability for damages. The price reduction remedy however leaves several issues for clarification and application in several respects.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.569-593
• /
• 2005

유럽배출권가래시장(EU ETS)과 Nord Pool에서 거래되고 있는 탄소배출권 가격자료를 이용하여 일물일가법칙 만족 여부를 검정하였다. 이를 위해 단위근 검정방법과 공적분 검정방법을 이용하였고, 인과성 분석, 충격반응분석과 분산분해 분석을 통해 두 시장간의 동태적 움직임을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 두 시장간 국제 배출권 가격 사이에는 일물일가의 법칙이 성립하며, EU ETS가 Nord Pool의 가격을 선도(lead)하고 EU ETS의 가격이 Nord Pool 가격의 움직임에 영향을 주는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 Nord Pool은 자체 시장과 타 시장의 변동 모두에 큰 영향을 받는 시장인 반면, EU ETS는 외부의 충격에 큰 영향을 받지 않는 시장으로 분석되었다. 향후 유럽 지역에서의 배출권 시장이 EU ETS를 중심으로 통합되어 하나의 배출권 시장을 형성할 것으로 예측된다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.133-158
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze one of CIETEC(China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission) Award on the dispute arising from Cotton Sale Contact which deals with damages and reduction of the price. Especially this case focused on the effect of reduction of the price to damages. The purpose of damages is to place the aggrieved party in as good a position as if the other party had properly performed the contract. So court costs and attorney's fee should be regarded as the loss, because these are caused by consequence of the breach which is recoverable. With the same reason, overpaid taxes should also regard as the loss. It is not impossible, however, to claim both damages and reduction of the price for same loss at the same time. It means buyer could not claim damages for the same loss, once he already claimed reduction of the price. So Korean companies should consider which remedy is proper to himself under the circumstances. He should choose reduction of the price when market price is down. In case of rising market price, he should consider follows: first, it is better to choose damages based on current price(Art.76), if upswing of non-conformity price is higher then upswing of market price. Second, it is better to choose general rule for measuring damages(Art.74), if upswing of market price is higher then upswing of non-conformity price.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.47-67
• /
• 2020

I explore that South Korea's major import fishery product markets-frozen hairtail, frozen mackerel, frozen pollock and frozen squid-are integrated by testing whether there is favorable evidence of the law of one price (LOP). Unlike previous studies on the LOP for fishery product markets, I assume non-zero import costs and include them in a trade model. To explore whether LOP holds for major import fishery product markets in South Korea with non-zero import costs, I utilize a non-linear time-series model, Smooth Transition Autoregressive (STAR) model with the sample periods from January in 2002 to December in 2019. I find that the behaviors of home-foreign price (i.e., import price) differentials of all four major import fishery products are non-linear depending on whether trade occurs and favorable evidence of LOP for each import market in South Korea. These findings indicate that each of South Korea's major import fishery product markets is integrated. They imply that the supply of each major import fishery product-frozen hairtail, frozen pollock, frozen mackerel and frozen squid, and their prices are stable even if there is an economic shock on each market. When it comes to trade policy implications, the Korean trade policy including tariffs or quotas against their import countries for the four major import fishery products may not have influences on their price in the markets.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제12권
• /
• pp.201-225
• /
• 1999

This article is focused on the review of price reduction and measuring damages under the CISG together with the law relating to sale of goods in main countries when the goods delivered did not conform with the contract. And also reviewed on the election of remedies for the aggrieved party, that is, which one between the two remedies would provide more compensation for the non-conformity. This article can be summarized as below. 1. Price reduction has its principal significance when the buyer accepts non-conforming goods and plays important role only when the seller is not liable for the non-conformity because the same price reduction formula applies for all circumstances. Of course, the buyer must bear any further damages, such as shutdown expenses and other consequential damages. 2. If the seller is liable for the damages and the price level rises, the buyer normally will claim damages since this approach is much more favorable result than price reduction. 3. In case the seller is liable for the damages and the buyer suffers no consequential damages, if the price level falls, price reduction would provide more compensation for the non-conformity than would damages and if there is no change in the market level, the allowance for defects in the goods will be normally the same under the price reduction and damages. By the way, In case the seller is liable for the damages and the buyer suffers consequential damages, it is desired that the buyer firstly elect the price reduction and later seeks to claim for consequential losses when the price level falls and unchanged.