• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제60권5호
• /
• pp.81-93
• /
• 2018

The Kajiyama formula, which is an empirical formula based on the maximum flood data at Korean watersheds, has been widely used for the design of hydraulic structures and management of watersheds. However, this formula was developed based on meteorological data and flow measured during early 1900s so that it could not consider the recently changed rainfall pattern due to climate changes. Moreover, the formula does not provide the monthly coefficients for 5 months including July and August (flood season), which causes the uncertainty to accurately interpret runoff characteristics at a watershed. Thus, the objective of this study is to enhance the monthly coefficients based on the recent meteorological data and flow data expanding the range of rainfall classification. The simulated runoff using the enhanced monthly coefficients showed better performance compared to that using the original coefficients. In addition, we evaluated the applicability of the enhanced monthly coefficient for future runoff prediction. Based on the results of this study, we found that the Kajiyame formula with the enhanced coefficients could be applied for the future prediction. Hence, the Kajiyama formula with enhanced monthly coefficient can be useful to support the policy and plan related to management of watersheds in Korea.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제34권6호
• /
• pp.713-724
• /
• 2001

수자원 기술자들은 수자원 계획에 있어서 중요한 월유출 모의 모형을 개발하여 왔으며, 우리 나라에서는 가지야마 모형을 대표적인 월유출 모형으로 이용하고 있다. 최근 Xiong과 Guo (1999)는 2-변수 월 물수지 방정식 모형 을 제안하였고, 수자원 계획과 기상학적인 영향을 분석하기 위하여 제안한 모형을 이용할 수 있음을 보였다. 그러나 그들은 시간변환 변수 c와 저수지 포장 용수량 변수 SC를 시행착오에 의하여 추정하였다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 2-변수 모형의 변수인 c와 SC를 추정하는 방법론을 제안하고, 2-변수 월 물수지 방정식 모형과 가지야마 모형을 한강 유역과 IHP 대표유역에 적용하여 비교 점토하고자 한다. c는 실제 증발산량과 잠재 증발산량 사이의 관계에 의하여 추정하였고, SC는 CN 값과의 관계를 사용하여 추정하였으며, 추정된 모형변수 c와 SC는 2-변 수 월 물수지 방정식 모형을 위하여 초기치 혹은 최적치로 이용할 수 있음을 보이고자 한다.

• 물과 미래
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.101-114
• /
• 1976

본 논문은 미 계측 중심하천의 재현기간별 계획홍수량을 산정 하는 수 문학적 방법을 제시하고 있다. 수위유량자료가 전무한 중소하천 유역의 지상학적 특성분석을 시행하여 제상관관계로부터 하천의 유출율을 결정하고 사용 가능한 인근 항우관측소로부터 빈도처리된 량량자료를 사용하므로서 합리식의 안전한 사용을 시도하였으며 유역특성이 비슷한 인근유역의 기 유도된 단위도의 관계식을 활용하므로서 첨두유량을 산정 상호비교할 수 있도록 하였다. 이를 금강의 제2지유이며 유역면적 $192.2\textrm{km}^2$로써 유역의 종합개발을 위한 기초수문자료가 시급한 무심천을 선정하여 하천 소구간별로 재현기간별 계획홍수량과 첨두홍수량을 산정하여 인근유역인 미호천유역의 실측자료로 구한 첨두유출량과의 상관분석을 통하여 검정해 본 결과 상관계수 r=0.93을 나타내므로 계산한 계획홍수량의 실용가능성을 입증하였다.

• 한국방재학회 논문집
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.77-84
• /
• 2011

각종 수공구조물 설계를 위한 첨두홍수량을 추정시 합리식(rational formula) 및 가지야마(Kajiyama)공식 등을 사용하고 있으나, 이러한 방법들을 이용하여 가능최대홍수량(PMF)을 산정하기 위해서는 가능최대강수량(PMP)의 추정이 선행되어야 하므로 미계측지역에서는 적용에 상당한 제약이 따른다. Creager 등이 1945년에 제시한 Creager방법은 비홍수량산정기법의 일종으로 유역면적과 PMF사이의 비선형성을 직접 수식화하여 제공하므로 PMP값이 주어지지 않은 상황에서 PMF산정이 가능하며, 주로 중규모이상 다목적댐의 PMF 산정시 사용되어 왔는데, 국내에는 아직 적용된 사례가 많지 않다. 본 연구에서는 PMP도를 이용한 강우-유출 모델로 산정된 상수전용댐과 다목적댐의 PMF를 이용하여 유역규모와 강우지속시간에 따라 보편적으로 적용할 수 있는 Creager 공식의 매개변수와 Creager 계수값의 결정범위 및 기준 등을 산정하여 국내 유역에 적용가능한 방법을 제시하였다.

• 물과 미래
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.71-82
• /
• 1991

수질원 부존량의 평가를 위한 월유출량의 추정방법은 통상 경험식에 의한 방법, 물수지분석에 의한 방법 그리고 회귀분석에 의한 방법등이 있다. 본 연구는 수위계측지점의 유출자료를 사용하여 다중회귀분석으로 회귀모형을 수립함으로서, 장기 수자원 개발계획의 수립에 필요한 월유출량의 추정을 가능토록하였다. 사용한 자료는 총 48개 수위관측소의 월유출량 및 기상,지상 인자 이며 이중 43개 지점은 모형의 개발에, 나머지 5개 지점은 모형의 검증에 이용하였다. 또한 모형을 유역별모형과 전체모형, 평균치모형과 개별자료모형으로 구분하여 모형-1, 모형-2, 모형-3 그리고 모형-4의 4개 모형을 수립하였으며, 검증결과 모형-2가 가장 적절한 모형으로 판단되었다. 선정된 회귀모형과 기존의 가지야마공식의 적용성을 통계적 방법에 의해 비교한 결과 본 다중회귀모형이 연유출량 뿐아니라 월별유출량의 변화성향을 매우 잘 나타내고 있으며, 적용 또한 용이함이 입증되었다.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.1011-1034
• /
• 1966

This thesis is the final report which has long been studied by the author to obtain the design basis for various hydrological constructions with the specific system suitable to the natural environmental conditions in Korea. This report is divided into two parts: one is to estimate runoff volume from watersheds and the other to estimate the peak discharge for a single storm. According to the result of observed runoff record from watersheds, it is known that Kajiyama formula is useful instrument in estimating runoff volume from watersheds in this country. But it has been found that this formula shows us 20-30% less than the actual flow. Therefore, when wihed to bring a better result, the watershed characteristics coefficient in this formula, that is, f-value, should be corrected to 0.5-0.8. As for the method to estimate peak discharge from drainage basin, the author proposes to classify it in two ways; one is small size watershed and the other large size watershed. The maximum -flood discharge rate $Q_p$ and time to peak Pt obtained from the observed record on the small size watershed are compared by various methods and formulas which are based upon the modern hydrological knowledge. But it was fou.d that it. was not a satisfied result. Therefore, the author proposes. tocomputate $Q_p$, to present 4.0-5.0% for the total runoff volume ${\Sigma}Q$.${\Sigma}Q$ is computed under the assumption of 30mm 103s in watershed per day and to change the theoritical total flow volume to one hour dura tion total flow rate when design daily storm is given. Time to peak Pt is derived from three parameters which are u,w,k. These are computed by relationship between total runoff volume (ha-m unit)and $Q_p$. (C.M.S. unit). Finally, the author checked out these results obtained from 51 hydrographs and got a satisfied result. Therefore the author suggested the model of design dimensionless unit-hydrograph. And the author believes that this model will be much available at none runoff record river site. In the large size watersheds in Korea when the maximum discharge occurs, the effective rainfall is two consequtive stormy days. So the loss in watershed was assutned as 6Omm/2days,and the author proposed 3-hour-daration hydrograph flow distribution percentage. This distribution percentage will be sure to form the hydrograph coordinate.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.178-182
• /
• 2005

In the forthcoming 21C, the development of cultural lives depends on that the water demand will increase or not. On the opposite site of that circumstance, many factors of the small watersheds will influence directly on how to cover the surface of watersheds with land use, no planning developing watersheds, and the rearrangement of small rivers. Especially as the extraordinary climatic Phenomena, exhaust of $CO_2$ and destruction of 03 layer, water resource and water foresting content of the small watersheds will be decreased by confusing on the malting a plan of water resources. For example, those are Typhoon Rusa in 2002, Typhoon Maemi in 2003 and heavy storms in 2004. This study area has three group and one of them having three small watersheds, total five small watersheds. That is, Sabukmyeon small watersheds in Chuncheon, Three small watersheds in Wonju(Jeoncheon, Jupocheon and Hasunamcheon), and Suipcheon in Yanggu-Gun which are located far away each other three group and different precipitation data. According to the land use such as dry field(or farm), rice field, forest land. building site and others in small watersheds, the amount of runoff will be impacted by monthly precipitation. The comparison between the runoff was getting from Kajiyama Formula and calculated runoff from multi-linear regressed equations by land use Percentage was performed with different precipitation data and different small watersheds. Its correlations which are estimated by coefficient of correlation will be accepted or not, as approached 1.0000 values. As the monthly water resources amount is estimated by multi-linear regressed equations with different precipitation data and different small watersheds having no gauging station, we make a plan in order to demand and supply the water quantity from small river watersheds during return periods.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.3438-3453
• /
• 1974

Unmeasured value of water for human lives is widely approved, but the water as one of natural resources cannot be evaluated with ease since it changes itself ceaselessly by flowing-out or transforming the phase. Major objectives of the study concerned consequently with investigating its potentiality and evaluating its time seriesly availabity in a volumatic unit. And the study was performed to give the accurate original data to the planners concerned. Some developed rational methods of predicting runoff related to hydrological factors as precipitation, were to be discusseed for their theorical background and to be introduced whether they needed some corrections or not, comparing their estimation with actual runoff from synthetic unit-hydrograph methods. To do so, the study was performed to select Kongju Station, located at the watershed of the Keum River, and to collect such hydrological data from 1962 to 1972 as runoff, water level, precipitation, and so on. On the other hand, the hydrological characteristics of runoff were concluded more reasonably in numerical values, with calculating the the ratio of daily runoff to annual discharge of the flow in percentage, as. the distribution ratio of runoff. The results of the study can be summarized as follows; (1) There needed some consideration to apply the Kajiyama's Formula for predicting monthly runoff of rivers in Korea.(2) The rational methods of predicting runoff might be recommended to become less theorical and reliable than the unique analyzation of data concerned in each given water basin. The results from the Keum River prepared above would be available to any programms concerned. (3) The most accurate estimation for runoff could be suggested to synthetic unithydrograph methods calculated from the relation between each storm and runoff. However it was not contained in the study. (4) The relations between rainfall and runoff at KongJu Station were as following table. The table showed some intersting implications about the characteristics of runoff at site, which indicated that the runoff during three months from July to September approached total of 60% of quantity while precipitation concentrated on the other three from June to August. And there were some months which had more amount of runoff than expected values calculated from the precipitation, such as Febrary, March, August, September, Octover, and December, shown in the table. Such implications should be suggested to meet any correction factors in the future formulation concerned with the subjects, if any rational methods would be required.