• 제목/요약/키워드: journals evaluation

검색결과 261건 처리시간 0.032초

국내 커플관계교육 연구의 프로그램 개발과정 분석: 생활과학분야 학술지 논문을 중심으로 (Couples relationship education program research in Korea: An analysis of program development in human ecology journals)

  • 박지수;이진경;이재림
    • 한국가족관계학회지
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.81-105
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze how couples relationship education (CRE) programs in Korean scholarly journals have been developed since they first appeared in 1994. Method: We selected articles that were published in journals related to human ecology and that included information about how the authors developed CRE programs (premarital education, marriage education). Using coding schemes based on the theoretical frameworks of CRE, we quantitatively coded programs in four specific areas: (a) overall characteristics, (b) program planning, (c) program construction and implementation, and (d) program evaluation. Results: Although CRE programs have increased and evolved since the 1990s, the literature has been limited on testing long-term program efficacy, developing dissemination plans, and applying theories to program design. In terms of program participants and content, most programs had similar themes despite their differences in the target audience. We also found that few programs have been provided for diverse couples. As for evaluation, pre- and post-testing was the most common method of efficacy test. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that family researchers and practitioners develop more elaborate and systematic programs to advance CRE in Korea as a core topic of family life education and to provide evidence-informed practice.

외국학술지지원센터(FRIC) 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Development of Evaluation Measures and Indicators for Foreign Research Information Centers)

  • 오동근;여지숙;최성열
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제43권2호
    • /
    • pp.99-116
    • /
    • 2012
  • 이 연구는 국가적 차원에서 외국학술지의 효율적 이용을 위해 설립된 외국학술지지원센터들의 운영전반과 성과를 평가하기 위한 평가지표를 개발하기 위해 시도된 것이다. 이를 위해 이 연구에서는 평가지표를 운영전략과 운영시스템, 운영성과의 세 부문으로 나누고, 이를 다시 8개 세부부문, 16개 지표, 35개 세부지표로 구분하여 제시하였다. 각각의 지표는 AHP 전문가설문조사 결과 도출된 가중치로 배점을 결정하였으며, 최종점수는 운영전략부문 190점, 운영시스템부문 440점, 운영성과부문 370점, 총 1,000점 만점으로 구성하였다. 개발된 평가지표를 바탕으로 평가지표정의서를 개발하였으며, 이 정의서를 기반으로 시범평가와 자체평가를 실시하여, 차후의 실제평가에서 나타날 수 있는 문제점들을 검토하도록 하였다.

경영정보학 연구에 나타난 실증적 연구방법 적용상의 문제: 평가를 통해 얻은 교훈 (Application of Empirical Research Methods in Information Systems Research: Gaining Lessons Through Evaluation)

  • 강신철;이중기;최정일
    • Asia pacific journal of information systems
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-25
    • /
    • 2006
  • Application of appropriate research methods has assumed an important role in knowledge accumulation endeavors in the scientific research community. The current study reported here summarizes how we used the empirical methods in IS research, what we need to improve in using empirical study as research methodology through the set of comprehensive research guideline. From the survey and review of seminal and classical research guidelines, we developed our own 28 checklist for research design, statistical analysis, and conclusion, which can be commonly applied to all articles that employ inferential statistical methods in IS research. Then, we critically evaluated the usage of empirical research methods in major IS journals by using the checklist, with the goal of improving the quality of academic papers. In this study, we scrutinized four major IS journals which published empirical papers from 1991 to 2000: MIS Quarterly, Journal of MIS, Information Systems Research, and Decision Sciences. As a result of intensive evaluation work, we could highlight many areas that are lagging and call for greater attention with regard to the proper usage of empirical study in IS research. The research findings in this study can be referred as checklist and guideline when IS researcher applies the empirical method.

Strategic Framework for Website Evaluation based on a Review of Tourism and Hospitality Literature from 2010-2023

  • Xiaonan Li;Dave C. F. Chan;Rob Law
    • Journal of Smart Tourism
    • /
    • 제3권3호
    • /
    • pp.17-27
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study examines the scientific publications on website evaluation in hospitality and tourism from 2010 to 2023 through a systematic review and discusses implications for future research. The reviewed literature from publication years, journals, research methods, website-related stakeholders, context, various forms of Internet presence (Internet forms), and theories are analyzed to create a comprehensive website evaluation dimension. Furthermore, a conceptual framework is developed to show the relationship between the website characteristics, stakeholders-channels interaction, and stakeholders' reactions. The proposed website evaluation framework in hospitality and tourism synthesizes the existing knowledge, identifies gaps, and further advances our understanding of this research area.

국내 온라인 학술지의 접근성 평가 및 개선에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Evaluation and Improvement of Accessibility in Korean Online e-Journal)

  • 장보성
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제56권4호
    • /
    • pp.161-180
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구는 국내 온라인 학술지를 검색하고 원문을 확인할 수 있는 웹사이트의 접근성과 학술논문 형식 웹콘텐츠의 접근성 개선방안을 제시하는 데 목적이 있다. 국내 온라인 학술지를 발행하기 위해서는 논문투고관리시스템을 활용하고 있으며, 공공 또는 민간 학술DB사를 통해 서비스하고 있다. 온라인 학술지 출판 및 편집단계에서 접근성 관련 내용은 존재하지 않았으며, 국외의 경우 웹사이트, 웹콘텐츠의 접근성 제고를 위해 WCAG 2.1의 Level AA 준수를 목표로 설정하고, VPAT를 통해 학술지의 접근성 수준을 안내하고 있다. 국내 온라인 학술지의 웹콘텐츠 접근성 개선을 위해 학회의 편집·출판 규정에 접근성 사항을 추가하고, 학술지 편집자를 대상으로 접근성 교육과 온라인 학술지 접근성 체크리스트 개발, 연구자의 자가검증 제도화가 필요하다. 온라인 학술지의 웹사이트 접근성 개선을 위해서는 동등한 이용보장을 위해 웹사이트 사용 시 다양한 편의 기능 제공과 논문투고관리시스템에 접근성 기능을 안내하고, 학회 및 학술DB사마다 한국형 VPAT 제출을 의무화해야 한다.

건강도시 평가의 원칙 (Principles for Evaluating Healthy Cities)

  • 김진희
    • 보건교육건강증진학회지
    • /
    • 제29권4호
    • /
    • pp.67-81
    • /
    • 2012
  • Objectives: This article examines the diversity of healthy cities evaluation in practice and discusses the major conflicting issues in evaluating healthy cities to offer implications to academics and cities for application in their field. Methods: The author discusses issues on major topics that arose from a review of literature on selected articles from peer-reviewed journals, books and gray literature. The recently developed Korean Healthy Cities evaluation framework is used as a main source of reference. Results: Evaluating healthy cities is in itself a political process and requires multiple methodologies and diverse sources of data. Details of the evaluation process depend on the purposes and goals predetermined by the stakeholders. The Korean Healthy Cities evaluation framework applies these principles and suggests a participatory approach to evaluation, selection of indicators that provide evidence on the process of change and to use mixed evaluation methods. The involvement of stakeholders in the evaluation process can also be a useful tool to further strengthen partnerships and strategies for healthy cities. Conclusion: Cities need to engage more in evaluation activities and develop necessary skills and capacity to produce utility-driven evidence.

CONSORT-CHM 2017 지침에 근거한 대한한의학회지 및 회원학회지에 투고된 경구투여 한약 중재를 활용한 무작위 배정 비교 임상 연구(RCT)의 양적, 질적 평가 연구 (Orally Administered Korean Herbal Medicine Medications of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Korean Medicine and Related Journals: A Narrative Analysis using CONSORT-CHM 2017)

  • 문세훈;조정호;최승관; 한윤희;우현준;전병현;하원배;이정한
    • 대한한방내과학회지
    • /
    • 제44권6호
    • /
    • pp.1212-1242
    • /
    • 2023
  • Objectives: This study aims to explore the current usage status of orally administered Korean herbal medicine in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the Journal of Korean Medicine and member journals using the CONSORT-Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017 (CONSORT-CHM 2017) checklist. Methods: We searched the OASIS, RISS, and KMBASE archives as well as the websites of the Journal of Korean Medicine and 45 member journals to identify RCTs that used herbal interventions. Two independent researchers searched and categorized the RCTs and performed a quantitative evaluation by journal, study design, and target disease, as well as qualitative evaluation of the literature using CONSORT-CHM 2017. Results: After the search, 66 articles were selected. The quantitative evaluation resulted in 13 articles (19.6%) that were published in the Journal of Korean Medicine and 12 articles (18.1%) in the Journal of Internal Korean Medicine. In terms of study design, 62 articles (93.9%) were parallel, 4 articles (6%) were crossover, and 2-arm parallel study designs were the most common in 45 articles (68.2%). In terms of the study participants, physiological characteristics and mechanisms in healthy individuals were the most common in 21 studies (31.8%) and obesity in 9 studies (13.6%). In terms of assessing completeness in the CONSORT-CHM 2017 items, 29 articles were rated high, 31 were rated moderate, and 6 were rated low. Items 4a, 6a, and 7a had low reporting rates (≤ 30%), while items 2a, 2b, and 12a were completely reported in all studies. Conclusion: Future RCTs using orally administered Korean herbal medicine need to be reported completely, and the CONSORT-CHM 2017 checklist can be a helpful tool for this purpose.

공과대학에서 PBL 적용을 위한 평가방법 연구 (A Study on Evaluation Methods for Implementing PBL in Engineering School)

  • 이근수
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제19권5호
    • /
    • pp.605-610
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본 논문의 목적은 효율적인 문제중심학습을 적용하기 위한 평가방법을 개발한다. 연구 대상은 창의공학설계 교과목을 수강한 H대학 1학년 학생 68명 이었으며, PBL수업은 12주에 4개의 PBL문제를 적용하였다. PBL의 효율성을 관찰하기 위하여 학생들은 주어진 문제의 PBL 활동 과정에서 평가지를 작성하여 제출하였다. 또한 PBL 활동이 끝날 때 마다 평가지와 성찰일지를 작성하여 제출하였다. 연구 결과는 PBL에 대한 이해, 학습 내용에 대한 이해, 협동학습에 대한 이해, 자아성찰, 실제적 경험, 창의문제 해결력, 자기주도적 학습 능력, 의사소통 능력, 문서작성 능력, 프리젠테이션 능력, 관찰 능력, 평가 능력과 같은 다양한 PBL의 효과를 경험한 것으로 나타났다. PBL 활동에 대해서는 지난 학기에 비하여 자신감, 만족감, 성취감도 높았으며, PBL 수업이 매우 유용했다고 응답했으며, 수업에 대한 만족도도 높았다. 그러나 PBL 활동 과정에서 팀원들 간의 의사소통문제, 함께 모이는 문제, 적극적으로 참여하지 않는 팀원 문제, 시간이 소용되는 문제가 나타났다.

브래드포드법칙과 그 응용에 관한 고찰

  • 이경호
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제8권
    • /
    • pp.127-154
    • /
    • 1981
  • Today's complicated society with a rapid change needs more objective and accurate data for the better managerical decisions and the prospect for the future other than the intuition or subjective experience by men themselves. These data can't be extracted without the analysis of actual data by a n.0, pplying any of mathematical techniques. One of these mathematical techniques, called bibliometrics has been newly developed in the field of library and information science to extract the objective data for the better services through the library operations. The Beadford's Law, one important law in bibliometrics has provided rather scientific and objective basis on the more valid building of library collection within the constraints of budget. The purpose of the study is to investigate the theory of the Bradford's Law, to clarify the possible areas of its a n.0, pplication, and to discern some problems in doing so. The results of the study can be summarized as follows; (1) There is certain difference between the graphical formulation and verbal formulation of Bradford's Law. But this law is very useful for the field of library and information science, owing to the flexibility of the a n.0, pplication of the law in the field. (2) The minimal nucleus can consist of a single periodical only if j, the number of relevant papers in the most productive journals is greater than Z/2. On the other hand, if j is less than or equal to Z/2, then the minimal nucleus will consist of 2 or more periodicals. (3) It is possible to design the most compact selection of scientific periodicals covering any specified percentage P among the total periodicals by using the formulation, log n=Plog N+(1-P)logs, or Nlog N/s=P center dot N log N/s. (4) If there is need to provide all the articles needed by users the given budget, the library can purchase the proper number of journals, by using the formulation, f center dot AN=An+PN (log N/s-logn/s). (5) In the building of the library collection based on the decreasing ratio of use, the library can subscribe to the proper number of journals according to the satisfactory degree of the need, by using the formulation, f=Nu+uNlogN/S-uNlogn/s / nNlogN/s = 1+logN/m /logN/s (6) If the order of valuable journals is decided according to the frequency of being cited, the order can't always represent the value. (7) The evaluation criteria for the journals with high value, but less cited should be made a further study.

  • PDF

KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index)와 KCI(Korea Citation Index)의 2004년도 영향력지표값 비교분석 (Comparative Analysis of KoMCI 2004 and KCI 2004 Impact Factors)

  • 허선;이춘실
    • 정보관리연구
    • /
    • 제36권3호
    • /
    • pp.183-193
    • /
    • 2005
  • 대한의학회에서 발행하는 우리나라 의학학술지의 영향력지표인 KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index) 2004의 결과값과 한국학술진흥재단에서 산출한 우리나라 학술지의 영향력지표인 2004년도 KCI(Korea Citation Index)에 공통으로 포함된 의학학술지의 영향력지표(impact factor, IF), 자체인용제외 영향력지표(ZIF), 자체인용 영향력지표(SIF) 값을 비교하고, 왜 이 두 가지 지표 값 사이에 차이가 나는 지에 대하여 고찰하였다. KoMCI와 KCI에 공통으로 등재된 의학학술지 중 양쪽에 모두 2004년도 영향력지표 값이 있는 경우는 59종이었다. KoMCI IF 평균과 KCI IF 평균은 유의한 차이가 있었으며 KCI 값은 KoMCI의 18%이었다. KoMCI ZIF 평균과 KCI ZIF 평균은 0.01로 유의한 차이가 있었으며, KCI 값은 KoMCI 값의 23.5%이었다. 자체 인용에 영향력지표는 KoMCI SIF 평균이 0.13, KCI 평균이 0.02로 유의한 차이가 있었다(p=0.0000). 이러한 차이는 KCI의 인용문헌 데이터베이스를 전거통제(authority control)하지 않고, 학술지 논문에 저자가 기술한 상태 그대로 데이터 베이스에 입력하기 때문으로 추정된다. 앞으로 한국학술진흥재단이 이 KCI를 학술지평가에 사용하고자 한다면, 데이터베이스의 유일성을 확보하는 전거통제를 반드시 시행하여 정확하고 신뢰할 수 있는 영향지표를 산출하여야 한다.