• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.41-65
• /
• 2010

It is a matter for debate that which types of dispute may be resolved by arbitration. This problem is concerning the arbitrability of the subject-matter of a dispute. National laws establish the domain of arbitration. Each state decides which matters may or may not be resolved by arbitration in accordance with its own political, social and economic policy. In response to complexity and diversity of a social phenomenon, the dispute also is various, therefore can not be settled efficiently by means of court adjudication to which applies a law strictly. To overcome such problems we are going to seek to make use of arbitration. According to Korean Arbitration Act Art. 3 (1), any dispute in private laws would be the object of arbitral proceedings. For the promotion of fair and free competition, it is increasingly wide-ranging antitrust legislation across the world. It is matter for debate what can an arbitral tribunal do when confronted with an allegation that the contract under which the arbitration is brought is itself an illegal restraint of trade or in some other way a breach of antitrust law. The underlying question is how to accommodate the conflicting congressional policies favoring resolution of private controversies by arbitration and encouraging private suits to protect the public interests served by the antitrust laws. It is necessary to inquire into the arbitrability of antitrust issues on case-by-case basis, because the types of them are quite diverse. If antitrust issues are the dispute in private laws and the contracting parties agreed to submit to arbitration disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in the antitrust issues, the antitrust disputes are arbitrable. Not only international antitrust disputes but also domestic antitrust disputes are capable of being resolved by arbitration. When the public interests in the enforcement of antitrust legislation are asserted, it is possible to justify the annulment or the refusal of the recognition or the enforcement of an arbitral award that ignores public policy as a matter of it.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2010

해외건설공사에서는 종종 예기치 않는 환경에서 공사를 시공하는 상황에 직면하게 되는 경우가 있다. FIDIC에 있어서 예기치 않는 상황이 발생할 시 건설계약의 변경을 행하기 위해 시공자는 감독자에게 클레임을 통보하는 권리를 가지며, 발주자와 시공자 간의 화해가 성립하지 않을 경우에는 분쟁이 발생한다. 시공자가 발주자 보다 상황변화에 관한 더 상세한 자료를 가지고 있고 정보의 비대칭성을 초래하여 감독자나 중재자의 판단오류와 교섭에 의한 화해이득을 기대한 분쟁이 발생할 가능성이 있다. 본 연구에서는 분쟁 발생원인과 시공자의 클레임 이동에 착안하여 제3자에 의한 분쟁조정의 방식과 비용부담률이 분쟁발생에 관한 기법을 게임이론을 이용하여 분석하였으며 또한 그 모델을 클레임에 관한 DAB/DGB의 영향도 분석하였다. 그 결과 제3자의 조정에 있어서 과오의 확률을 작게 하는 것이 분쟁을 효율적 해결할 수 있다고 판단된다. 이에 급속한 건설시장의 변화에 대처하기 위해 해외건설공사의 계약관리 강화방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.132-140
• /
• 2006

1996년 12월 정부에서는 국내 건설산업의 효율성을 높이기 위하여 건설사업관리(CM) 제도를 처음 도입하게 되었다. 그러나, CM의 필요성을 인식하면서도 건설사업 초기단계에서 예상되는 문제점 및 낭비요소의 최소화와 객관적인 기술검토 등을 통한 의사결정능력은 향상되었지만, 발주자의 선택권이 보장되는 다양한 CM 서비스체계 구축과 CM대가 산정에는 많은 문제점이 존재한다. 정부가 발주하는 공공건설사업의 경우 발주자가 산정하는 방식과 CM업체가 산정하는 방식의 차이로 인해서 적정대가를 받지 못해 CM대가 산정이 제대로 이루어지지 않는다. 따라서, 본 논문에서는 실제 공공건설사업 중에서 문화예술회관 사례를 토대로 CM대가 산정에 대해 공사비비율에 의한 방식, 실비정액가산방식의 실제 계약된 금액을 다각도로 분석하여 어떤 불합리성이 존재하며, 아울러 그 원인은 무엇인지에 대해 분석하고자 한다. 이를 토대로 향후 CM의 적정대가 산정기준을 위한 연구의 자료에 일조를 하고자 한다.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.376-384
• /
• 2017

선박급유업은 국제물류흐름의 허브인 항만의 부가가치 창출을 위한 핵심적인 사업 중의 하나이다. 선박급유업의 법 제도적인 개선을 통하여 급유산업의 안정화를 도모하여 항만이 실질적으로 부가가치를 창출하는 기능을 수행할 수 있도록 해야 한다. 이 논문에서는 항만운송법과 해운법의 개정, 안전관리체계의 일원화, 선박유 품질관리를 위한 지침제정, 선박급유업자의 불법행위에 대한 관리 및 법 개정에 대한 대책을 제시하고 한다. 결론적으로 선박급유업의 경영 안정화 및 중장기 발전을 위하여 정부, 정유사, 급유선 선주 등이 주체별로 역할을 분담하여 할 것이며, 선진화를 위해서 단계적으로 계약체계 및 법 제도의 개선을 추진해야 할 것이다.

• 대한원격탐사학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한원격탐사학회 2006년도 Proceedings of ISRS 2006 PORSEC Volume II
• /
• pp.808-811
• /
• 2006

The KOMPSAT-2 was developed by KARI and it was successfully launched from Plesetsk, Russia on 28th July 2006. The Korean government decided the commercialization of the KOMPSAT-2 image data and direct reception services worldwide. SPOT Image, based in Toulouse (France) was selected by KARI through an international open bidding as a foreign company for the KOMPSAT-2 image promotion over the entire world except the territory of Republic of Korea including the North Korea, the United States of America, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Yemen, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. KAI (Korea Aerospace Industry Ltd.) is an engaged Korean company for this area. KARI has responsibility to operate the satellite, data acquisition, archiving for the worldwide commercialization. For the processing and delivery of the KOMPSAT-2 image data to the users of KAI and SPOT Image, KAI has the binding contract with KARI. So KAI has the responsibility for the commercial ground station operation such as user support, data processing, and the data delivery. The KOMPSAT-2 ground station is hosted in KARI, so KARI has developed the concept of KOCUST (KOMPSAT-2 Commercial User Support Team) jointly with KAI to support the data processing and delivery as KOMPSAT-2 developer and satellite operator. The main purpose of the KOCUST is to support the operational activities to provide the data and service quality to satisfy customers. KOCUST will be organized by the members of KARI and KAI together. KARI members will mainly take the role of KOCUST coordination, data processing and user support in a public sector. KAI members are going to take user desk, data validation and delivery et cetera, which are related with users. This paper describes a summarized concepts of KOCUST like organization, dedicated tasks of each part and work flow of daily operation.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.29-51
• /
• 2016

This paper reviews the Supreme Court decision of the United Kingdom in Jivraj v. Hashwani (2011) concerning the employment issue of arbitrators, falling within the exception of genuine occupational requirement under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, and nationality of arbitrators. In 2011, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered its judgment in Jivraj v. Hashwani, unanimously overturning decision of the English Court of Appeal. The facts of this case and the decision of the Court of Appeal have been widely discussed. The decision of the Supreme Court has been met with approval within the international arbitration community in London, having restored the legal position to that prior to the Court of Appeal's ruling. Thus, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Court of Appeal's finding that arbitrators are the employees of the arbitrating parties. Arbitrators were held to be genuinely self-employed, and therefore outside the scope of the Regulations or Equality Act(2010). As such, the anti-discrimination provisions are not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators. Most importantly, the Supreme Court's finding that arbitrators are not employees removes the possibility of challenges to arbitration agreements on the grounds that they are in breach of the Equality Act. As a practical matter, parties no longer need to consider carving out nationality provisions when drafting arbitration agreements.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2004년도 제5회 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.380-383
• /
• 2004

국내 건설산업은 정보화산업의 급속한 성장으로 인해 산업 전반에 걸친 변화의 흐름에 맞추어 사업 전 단계(기획, 설계, 발주, 시공, 유지)에 걸쳐 IT를 접목하려는 노력이 확산되고 있다 현재 국내 건설산업에서 PMIS 구축 노력이 가속화 되고 있는 시점에서, 대형 건설업체의 독자적으로 개발된 형태와 일부 ASP 사업자의 웹호스팅 서비스를 통한 PMIS가 건설현장에 도입되어 적용되고 있다. 본 연구는 D지역에 건설 중인 지하철 정거장 건축공사에 적용되고 있는 PMIS의 발주자 요구사항 분석 및 운영단계에서의 현실적인 문제점과 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 국내의 PMIS 적용 사례 및 국외 PMIS 기술 현황에 대해 고찰하고 D지역 지하철 건축공사에 적용된 PMIS의 발주자 요구사항, 설계안, 활용도를 분석한다. 분석 결과를 바탕으로 PMIS 운영상의 문제점에 대한 개선 방안을 계약 $\cdot$ 제도적 측면, 운영 $\cdot$ 관리적 측면, 그리고 외부시스템과의 연계 측면에서 제시한다

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.61-87
• /
• 2012

조직 구성원들은 자신의 가치와 조직의 성과를 높이기 위해 인적자본의 향상을 위한 노력뿐만 아니라 사회적 자본의 확충을 위해서 많은 노력을 하고 있는 추세이다. 이에 따라 본 연구의 목적은 조직 구성원 개인의 사적인 인맥으로 구성된 개인적 친밀네트워크가 성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 가에 대하여 검증하는 것이다. 본 연구에서 독립변수로 개인의 친밀 네트워크 특성을, 결과변수로 직무성과와 네트워크에의 협력의도로 설정하여 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 개인적 친밀네트워크가 개인성과에 미치는 영향을 분석한 결과 사회적 네트워크의 특성 중 크기, 강도, 지위가 협력행동에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 직무성과에는 크기와 강도만 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.6-11
• /
• 2010

Amid the rapid transitions in both local and international markets, the Korean dental industry is facing more challenges than at any time in its history. This paper tried to address some of the key issues faced by the industry as well as the policy issues and I direction of implementation that the Korean Dental Association (KDA) is expected to tackle. First, the direction of reforming the country's health insurance system was examined with emphasis on the expected changes in and improvement of the fee-for-service reimbursement system (FFSRS) and medical reimbursement system (MRS). With FFSRS, the most urgent issue would be ameliorating the current lop-sided, unreasonable reimbursement system that prevents suppliers from voicing their opinions. To help achieve that goal, the limited authority and responsibility of the president of National Health Insurance Corporation (NHIC) as one of the contract-making parties must be clarified. In addition, the functions of NHIC's Health Insurance Finance Committee must be restricted; at the same time, the panel organization of the Health Insurance Policy Review Committee needs to be reformed to embrace greater democracy. As with MRS, the government is considering a block budget bill to help promote efficiency in employing and managing the health insurance fund. Policymakers must understand that the implementation of such proposal could exacerbate an already dire situation. Improving MRS requires meeting the following preconditions: (a) the structurally vicious cycle of small charge-small salary needs to be resolved, and a certain percentage of fee raise must be guaranteed on a yearly basis to help adjust the fee system to a more realistic level; (b) the supply-and-demand balance in producing health care professionals must be improved including the prevention of oversupply of doctors, nurses, etc., and; (c) institutional strategies must be provided to enhance the quality of medical care and ensure academic advancement in health care disciplines.

• 대한조선학회논문집
• /
• 제52권3호
• /
• pp.265-274
• /
• 2015

International organizations and classification societies established rules and regulations to which shipbuilders and ship operators should comply during design, construction, even operation keeping from hazard to life of crews and ocean environment. Hence, rules and regulations could be guidelines for design and construction of ship sometimes. In practical wise, ship structure designers be predisposed to design lightest and easy-to-product structures which satisfy rules and regulations. Therefore, changes of rules and regulations are remarkably important issue to related industries. In 2006, IACS established and released Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carrier and Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tanker. These CSRs are consolidated and unified rules of class society's rules. But these two rules are different from each other. IACS has plan to release unified rule of two ship type called Harmonized Common Structural Rule for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers. This new rule will be effective from July 2015. Hence, bulk carrier and double hull oil tanker whose contract date is on and thereafter July 2015 should be complied with CSR-H. Therefore, it is highly important to be aware of consequences and cause of consequences with respect to CSR-H. The object of this research is to compare requirements of structure scantling in way of midship area for selected target ship according to CSRs and CSR-H and to analysis cause of deviation between two rules.