• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제56권1호
• /
• pp.11-21
• /
• 2023

최근 발생하는 극한가뭄에 대비하고자 본 연구는 실제 운영에서 수자원 시설물의 가뭄 취약도 및 가뭄대책별 우선순위를 파악할 수 있는 가뭄대응력 지표로 S-day를 제안하였다. 여기서 가뭄대책이란 용수공급 조정, 시설간 연계운영, 비상용량 고려 등이 대표적이며, 각 댐별로 그 구성에 차이가 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 15개 다목적댐 및 용수댐에 대하여 가뭄대응력을 산정하였으며, 그 결과 20년 빈도의 가뭄이 지속될 시 15개 댐 모두 전반적으로 용수공급 조정이라는 가뭄대책을 통해 안정적인 가뭄대응력을 보였다. 하지만 다른 대책에서는 2년 이상 지속되는 다년 가뭄을 대비하지 못하였으며, 횡성댐과 안동·임하댐은 100년 빈도 가뭄 발생 시 대부분의 대책에서 S-day가 1년을 넘기지 못하였다. 특히, 횡성댐, 안동·임하댐, 군위댐, 운문댐, 대청댐, 주암댐은 20년 빈도 가뭄 발생 시, 가뭄대책을 적용하지 않으면 1년 내로 정상적인 용수공급이 불가능할 것으로 나타났다. 이에 본 연구에서는 S-day를 통해 가뭄대책별 최적 공급 용량을 제안하고 대책별 가뭄단계에 따른 가동시기를 변경해 가뭄대응 효과를 평가하였다. 마지막으로 미래 사회·경제적 변동에 따른 수요변화를 반영하고자 현행 공급 계약량에 대해 10%씩 증감하여 전체 15개 댐의 가뭄대응력을 재평가하였다. 그 결과 공급계약량이 10% 감소할 경우, 대부분의 댐에서 용수공급 조정만으로도 심각한 가뭄에 대한 대비가 가능할 것으로 분석되었다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.285-313
• /
• 2013

우리나라의 정기용선 관련법은 2007년에 상법의 기존 규정에 대해 근본적으로 바꾸지 않고 유지하는 방향으로 개정함으로써 본 계약에서 중요한 제3자에 관한 권리 의무의 문제는 제외하였다. 따라서 현재, 정기용선과 관련하여 제3자에 대한 책임 문제를 해결하는데 상법을 통한 해결 방법의 도출보다는 법적 실무적인 사례들의 검토를 통해 논의하는 것이 적절하다 판단되고 있다. 정기용선계약은 당사자인 선주와 용선자 간에 이뤄지는 사적계약이며 계약의 특수성에 의해 제3자의 운송물에 손해가 발생하였을 때에 책임 주체를 명확히 하는 것이 어렵다. 이에, 선의의 제3자에 대한 운송물의 재산적 권리 보호를 위해 정기용선계약 하에서 선주와 용선자 중 누가 운송인인지를 구분 확정하는 것에 대한 법적 실무적인 기준의 정립이 필요하다. 현재, 정기용선 계약에서 당사자 간의 유책자 판단에 대해 법적 성질을 이용한 확정 방법은 그 명확성에 대해 논쟁 중인 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 정기용선계약의 특성에 입각하여 제3자의 화물 손해에 대한 책임 주체의 자격확정을 어떻게 할 것인가에 목적을 두고, 이에 따라 제3자 손해의 책임 주체를 찾아내기 위해 정기용선계약에서 논란이 되어 온 법적 성질을 검토 고찰하고 운송인의 자격을 확정할 수 있는 이외의 방법이 있는지, 또 운송 계약 하에서 책임 주체로서 운송인 확정을 위한 방법이 무엇이 있는지 검토 한다. 본 연구는 제3자 손해에 대한 구제 방안으로 당사자 간의 운송인 확정의 방법, 용선계약 내에 Inter-Club Agreement의 포함을 통한 제3자의 손해에 대한 책임 분담의 방법, 제3자의 구제 방안에 대한 규정의 상법에의 도입 또는 개정을 통한 방법을 검토하며 이러한 방법들이 정기용선계약 하에서 발생한 제3자의 손해 처리에 용이한 도움이 될 것이라 제시해 본다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제36권
• /
• pp.87-109
• /
• 2007

This Comment explores the ICSID case of CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic, awarded on May 12, 2005. The Part II of this Comment first describes the relevant facts of the case including the some background for readers' understanding and the Part III summaries the claimant's requests and the decisions rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal in the Award. At Part IV, the Comment addresses the issue of determinating laws applicable to the merits of dispute in case that the parties of the case have not chosen a governing law, and at Part V, takes a close look into three main issues of (i) the indirect expropriation of the investment, (ii) the breach of fair and equitable treatment and (iii) the protections under umbrella clauses. In this CMS case, we see first that while the Tribunal affirmed that any indirect expropriation can occur from incidental interference depriving the foreign investor of the use or reasonable-to-be-expected economic benefit even if not necessarily to the obvious benefit of the host State, the Tribunal denied the occurrence of indirect expropriation in this case by holding that the Government of Argentina has not breached the standard of protection laid down in the Treaty. Secondly, however, regarding the issue of fair and equitable treatment, we see that the Tribunal, finding Argentina's breach of obligations, affirmed that the foreign investor can expect the host State to act in a consistent manner, free from ambiguity and totally transparently in its relations with the foreign investor, which can give the foreign investor certain degree of foreseeability. Thirdly and finally, we see that, on base of the effect of the umbrella clause, the Tribunal recognized the obligation of the host State undertaken not to freeze the tariff regime or subject it to price controls and not to alter the basic rules governing contracts between the foreign investor and the host State without the first's written consent. However, the protection under the umbrella clause is available only when there is a specific breach of rights and obligations under BIT or a violation of contract rights protected under BIT.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.207-232
• /
• 2013

FTA상의 특혜관세 혜택을 누리기 위해서는 무엇보다도 수출입기업 스스로가 해당 FTA협정상의 원산지 규정 등에 대한 내용을 정확히 이해하고 올바로 활용할 수 있는 능력을 배양하는 것이 중요하다. 또한 FTA는 본질적으로 기업들에게 혜택을 주는 제도이지만 그에 따른 의무와 엄격한 충족을 전제로 하는 것이기 때문에 협정상 선결요건의 정확한 이해와 적용도 중요하다. 본 연구는 한 EU FTA 원산지의정서 제13조에 규정되어 있는 직접운송 요건을 충족하는지의 여부와 관련하여, 최근 관세청에 접수되어 결정이 내려진 심사청구사례를 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 우선 한 EU FTA하에서 원산지규정과 협정관세적용을 위한 직접운송 요건의 적용 법리를 분석을 토대로, 본 사례의 사실관계와 대상결정 및 본건 관련법령과 결정내용을 상세하게 분석한 후, 본 사례가 수출입기업들에게 주는 시사점과 실무상의 대응책 및 제도적 보완방안을 구체적으로 제시하고자 한다. 한편 본 연구는 국내외 학술문헌을 분석도구로 활용하는 문헌분석적 연구방법과 한 EU FTA 협정문의 주요내용을 법리적으로 분석하는 법리적 연구방법을 주로 채택하였다. 이외에 문헌연구의 한계를 극복하고 객관성을 향상시키기 위하여 심사청구되어 관세청이 결정한 최근의 사례를 분석하여 관련분야에 인용하는 사례분석적 연구방법도 병행하였다.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제32권5D호
• /
• pp.493-498
• /
• 2012

글로벌 경제의 불확실성 확대와 저성장 지속에 따른 해외건설시장의 성장 정체에도 불구하고 국내기업은 높은 기술 및 가격경쟁력을 바탕으로 견조한 시장점유율을 유지하고 있다. 그러나 해외건설시장에서 투자개발형사업의 비중이 확대되고 있음에도 불구하고 국내기업의 수주는 일반 도급형 사업에만 지나치게 편중되어 있는 실정이다. 사업발굴, 금융조달, 시공 및 운영까지 종합적인 역량을 요구하는 투자개발형사업에 있어서 안정적인 재원조달과 수익성 확보는 무엇보다 중요한 요인이다. 이러한 관점에서 개발도상국을 중심으로 재원투자를 확대하고 있는 다자간개발은행에 대한 관심 제고는 어느 때보다 절실한 상황이다. 그러나 다자간개발은행에 대한 국내기업의 전략적인 접근은 이뤄지지 않고 있으며 정부의 지원정책도 효율성도 낮은 수준이다. 본 연구는 이러한 필요성와 시급성을 바탕으로 국내기업의 다자간개발 은행에 대한 인식과 진출 실적을 분석하고 다자간개발은행의 투자시장 진출을 위한 민간 및 정부차원의 역량과 정책적 지원 방안을 제시하였다. 연구결과에 따르면 다자간개발은행 투자사업은 입찰의 공정성과 재원조달 안정성이 장점으로 평가되었으며 국내기업의 진출 확대를 위해서는 시장에 대한 체계적인 정보제공, 전담조직의 구성과 운영, 기업 간 과당경쟁 방지, 공적자금과의 연계성 확보 등이 중요한 요인으로 제시되었다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.273-284
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 국제유가와 국내외 해외건설 수주액간의 상관성을 분석하였다. 최근 20년간 국제유가 통계데이터와 국내 건설업체와 글로벌 해외건설기업의 해외건설 신규수주액 자료를 토대로 두 변수간의 상관계수(R)와 P-vaule 값을 산출하여 상관관계를 분석하였다. 국내 건설업체의 해외건설 수주액과 국제유가의 상관성을 분석한 결과, 국제유가는 해외건설 수주액과의 상관계수가 0.8 이상이기 때문에 상관성이 높다고 볼 수 있다. 또한 국제유가와 Top 250 글로벌 해외건설기업의 신규 수주액의 상관성을 분석한 결과, 상관계수가 0.76으로 매우 높은 것을 알 수 있다. 따라서 국제유가의 변동에 따른 해외건설 수주액 증감에 영향을 많이 미치고 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 특히 아시아 지역과 중동지역의 해외건설 수주액의 상관계수가 매우 높았고, 산업설비와 건축의 해외건설 수주액의 상관계수가 매우 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과는 플랜트의 발주물량이 증가한 것을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 본 연구는 국제 유가변동에 대응하고, 해외건설 시장에서 경쟁력을 유지하기 위하여 진출전략을 제안하였다. 주요 방안으로는 다양한 지역 및 공급처 확보방안, 환율 변동위험을 최소화하기 위해 헤지기법을 활용하는 리스크 관리방안, 현지화된 인프라와 현지 시장에 적응할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다. 또한 현지 파트너십 구축과 현지 인력 확보방안과 건설 현장에서의 기술 혁신과 디지털화를 통해 생산성을 높이고 비용 절감 방안을 제안하였다. 이러한 연구결과 및 해외진출 전략은 유가 변동에 대응하여 해외 건설시장에서의 위험을 줄이고, 경쟁력을 강화하는 데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.75-101
• /
• 2012

As the Reublic of Korea revised the Commercial Code including 40 articles of air transport enacted newly on May 23, 2011, so Korea became first legislative examples in the Commercial Code of the developed and developing countries. I would like to explain briefly the main contents of my paper such as (1) history of enacting newly Part VI (air transport) in the Korea's revised commercial law, (2) legal background enacting newly Part VI (air transport) in the Korea's revised commercial law and the problems on the conditions of air transport, (3) every countries' legislative examples on the civil liability of aircraft's operator, (4) unlawful Interference Convention and general risk convention of 2009, (5) main contents and prospects of the revised Commercial Code for the liability of aircraft's operator etc as the followings. Meanwhile as the Aviation Act, Commercial Code and Civil Code in Korea and Japan did not regulated at all the legal basis of solution on the disputes between victims and offender for the amount of compensation for damage due to personal or property damage caused by aircraft accidents in Korea and Japan, so it has been raised many legal problems such as protection of victims, standard of decision in trial in the event of aircraft accident's lawsuit case. But the Korean Revised Commercial Code including Part VI, air transport regulations was passed by the majority resolution of the Korean National Assembly on April 29, 2011 and then the South Korean government proclaimed it on May 23 same year. The Revised Commercial Code enforced into tothe territory of the South Korea from November 24, 2011 after six month of the proclaimed date by the Korean Government. Thus, though Korean Commercial Code regulated concretely and respectively the legal relations on the liability of compensation for damage in the contract of transport by land in it's Part II (commercial activities) and in the contract of transport by sea in its Part V (marine commerce), but the Amended Commercial Act regulated newly 40 articles in it's Part VI (air transport) relating to the air carrier's contract liability on the compensation for damage caused by aircraft accidents in the air passengers and goods transport and aircraft operator's tort liability on compensation for damage caused by the sudden falling or collision of aircraft to third parties on the surface and so it was equipped with reasonable and unified system among the transport by land, marine and air. The ICAO adopted two new air law conventions setting out international compensation and liability rules for damage caused by aircraft to third parties at a diplomatic conference hosted by it from April 20 to May 2, 2009. The fight against the effects of terrorism and the improvement of the status of victims in the event of damage to third parties that may result either from acts of unlawful interference involving aircraft or caused by ordinary operation of aircraft, forms the cornerstone of the two conventions. One legal instrument adopted by the Conference is "the Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties, Resulting from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft" (Unlawful Interference Convention). The other instrument, "the Convention on Compensation for Damage Caused by Aircraft to Third Parties" (General Risk Convention), modernizes the current legal framework provided for under the 1952 Rome Convention and related Protocol of 1978. It is desirable for us to ratify quickly the abovementioned two conventions such as Unlawful Interference Convention and General Risk Convention in order to settle reasonably and justly as well as the protection of the South Korean peoples.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제1권
• /
• pp.147-162
• /
• 1989

The current status of the application and interpretation of the Warsaw Convention and its subsequent Protocols in Asian countries is in its fredgling stages compared to the developed countries of Europe and North America, and there is thus little published information about the various Asian governments' treatment and courts' views of the Warsaw System. Due to that limitation, the accent of this paper will be on Korea and Japan. As one will be aware, the so-called 'Warsaw System' is made up of the Warsaw Convention of 1929, the Hague Protocol of 1955, the Guadalajara Convention of 1961, the Guatemala City Protocol of 1971 and the Montreal Additional Protocols Nos. 1,2,3 and 4 of 1975. Among these instruments, most of the countries in Asia are parties to both the Warsaw Convention and the Hague Protocol. However, the Republic of Korea and Mongolia are parties only to the Hague Protocol, while Burma, Indonesia and Sri Lanka are parties only to the Warsaw Convention. Thailand and Taiwan are not parties only to the convention or protocol. Among Asian states, Indonesia, the Phillipines and Pakistan are also parties to the Guadalajara Convention, but no country in Asia has signed the Guatemala City Protocol of 1971 or the Montreal Additional Protocols, which Protocols have not yet been put into force. The People's Republic of China has declared that the Warsaw Convention shall apply to the entire Chinese territory, including Taiwan. 'The application of the Warsaw Convention to one-way air carriage between a state which is a party only to the Warsaw Convention and a state which is a party only to the Hague Protocol' is of particular importance in Korea as it is a signatory only to the Hague Protocol, but it is involved in a great deal of air transportation to and from the united states, which in turn is a party only to the Warsaw Convention. The opinion of the Supreme Court of Korea appears to be, that parties to the Warsaw Convention were intended to be parties to the Hague Protocol, whether they actually signed it or not. The effect of this decision is that in Korea the United States and Korea will be considered by the courts to be in a treaty relationship, though neither State is a signatory to the same instrument as the other State. The first wrongful death claim in Korea related to international carriage by air under the Convention was made in Hyun-Mo Bang, et al v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. case. In this case, the plaintiffs claimed for damages based upon breach of contract as well as upon tort under the Korean Civil Code. The issue in the case was whether the time limitation provisions of the Convention should be applicable to a claim based in tort as well as to a claim based in contract. The Appellate Court ruled on 29 August 1983 that 'however founded' in Article 24(1) of the Convention should be construed to mean that the Convention should be applicable to the claim regardless of whether the cause of action was based in tort or breach of contract, and that the plaintiffs' rights to damages had therefore extinguished because of the time limitation as set forth in Article 29(1) of the Convention. The difficult and often debated question of what exactly is meant by the words 'such default equivalent to wilful misconduct' in Article 25(1) of the Warsaw Convention, has also been litigated. The Supreme Court of Japan dealt with this issue in the Suzuki Shinjuten Co. v. Northwest Airlines Inc. case. The Supreme Court upheld the Appellate Court's ruling, and decided that 'such default equivalent to wilful misconduct' under Article 25(1) of the Convention was within the meaning of 'gross negligence' under the Japanese Commercial Code. The issue of the convention of the 'franc' into national currencies as provided in Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention as amended by the Hague Protocol has been raised in a court case in Korea, which is now before the District Court of Seoul. In this case, the plaintiff argues that the gold franc equivalent must be converted in Korean Won in accordance with the free market price of gold in Korea, as Korea has not enacted any law, order or regulation prescribing the proper method of calculating the equivalent in its national currency. while it is unclear if the court will accept this position, the last official price of gold of the United States as in the famous Franklin Mint case, Special Drawing Right(SDR) or the current French franc, Korean Air Lines has argued in favor of the last official price of gold of the United States by which the air lines converted such francs into us Dollars in their General Conditions of Carriage. It is my understanding that in India, an appellate court adopted the free market price valuation. There is a report as well saying that if a lawsuit concerning this issue were brought in Pakistan, the free market cost of gold would be applied there too. Speaking specifically about the future of the Warsaw System in Asia though I have been informed that Thailand is actively considering acceding to the Warsaw Convention, the attitudes of most Asian countries' governments towards the Warsaw System are still wnot ell known. There is little evidence that Asian countries are moving to deal concretely with the conversion of the franc into their own local currencies. So too it cannot be said that they are on the move to adhere to the Montreal Additional Protocols Nos. 3 & 4 which attempt to basically solve many of the current problems with the Warsaw System, by adopting the SDR as the unit of currency, by establishing the carrier's absolute liability and an unbreakable limit and by increasing the carrier's passenger limit of liability to SDR 100,000, as well as permiting the domestic introduction of supplemental compensation. To summarize my own sentiments regarding the future, I would say that given the fact that Asian air lines are now world leaders both in overall size and rate of growth, and the fact that both Asian individuals and governments are becoming more and more reliant on the global civil aviation networks as their economies become ever stronger, I am hopeful that Asian nations will henceforth play a bigger role in ensuring the orderly and hasty development of a workable unified system of rules governing international commercial air carriage.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.197-224
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to make research on the party's autonomy principle and the applicable law to the arbitration agreement, the applicable law to the validity of the arbitration agreement, the applicable law to the arbitrability of the arbitration agreement, the applicable law to the contracting ability of the arbitration agreement, and the applicable law to the method of the arbitration agreement. If no choice of law is made by the parties with respect to the arbitration agreement-which is the stand situation-the validity of the agreement may have to decided under its proper law, or under the law of the place of arbitration, or the law of the place of enforcement. If the subject matter is not arbitrable, the arbitration agreement remains without effect. The rules determining arbitrability may differ from one country to another, from one legal system to another. If a party is lacking capacity to enter into an arbitration agreement, the recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award may be refused at the request of the party against whom it is invoked. This principle is laid down in the New Yark Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The validity of an arbitration agreement sometimes also depends on the form in which it is made. Article II. 2 of the New York Convention states that the term 'agreement in writing' shall include an arbitral clause in a contract or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties of contained in exchange of letters or telegrams.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.41-65
• /
• 2010

It is a matter for debate that which types of dispute may be resolved by arbitration. This problem is concerning the arbitrability of the subject-matter of a dispute. National laws establish the domain of arbitration. Each state decides which matters may or may not be resolved by arbitration in accordance with its own political, social and economic policy. In response to complexity and diversity of a social phenomenon, the dispute also is various, therefore can not be settled efficiently by means of court adjudication to which applies a law strictly. To overcome such problems we are going to seek to make use of arbitration. According to Korean Arbitration Act Art. 3 (1), any dispute in private laws would be the object of arbitral proceedings. For the promotion of fair and free competition, it is increasingly wide-ranging antitrust legislation across the world. It is matter for debate what can an arbitral tribunal do when confronted with an allegation that the contract under which the arbitration is brought is itself an illegal restraint of trade or in some other way a breach of antitrust law. The underlying question is how to accommodate the conflicting congressional policies favoring resolution of private controversies by arbitration and encouraging private suits to protect the public interests served by the antitrust laws. It is necessary to inquire into the arbitrability of antitrust issues on case-by-case basis, because the types of them are quite diverse. If antitrust issues are the dispute in private laws and the contracting parties agreed to submit to arbitration disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in the antitrust issues, the antitrust disputes are arbitrable. Not only international antitrust disputes but also domestic antitrust disputes are capable of being resolved by arbitration. When the public interests in the enforcement of antitrust legislation are asserted, it is possible to justify the annulment or the refusal of the recognition or the enforcement of an arbitral award that ignores public policy as a matter of it.