• Title/Summary/Keyword: international comparative

Search Result 1,596, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

International Comparative Study on the Government Policy and Corporate Strategy in the Aerospace Industry (항공우주산업의 기업전략 및 정부정책에 대한 국제비교연구)

  • Lee, Yun-Cheol;Lim, Sang-Min
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics
    • /
    • v.14 no.2
    • /
    • pp.56-70
    • /
    • 2006
  • Since the 90's, the world's aerospace industry have been experienced the era of radical changes. We make a comparative study about the 10 countries government policies and corporate strategies changes in this era. In this study, we figure out aerospace industry's evolutional patterns and factors through evolutionary perspective, and then, proposed development strategies and implications for Korea's aerospace industry.

  • PDF

A Study on the Patterns of New Terrorism through the Comparative Analysis with Conventional Terrorism (고전적 테러리즘과의 비교 분석을 통한 뉴 테러리즘 양상에 대한 연구)

  • Song, Jae-Hyeong
    • Journal of National Security and Military Science
    • /
    • s.1
    • /
    • pp.113-154
    • /
    • 2003
  • We can feel the fear through the reports of outbreaking centers of terror. Also, we noticed through "the 9.11 terror" that there exists no safety zone from terrorism. However, we should question ourselves whether we are relaxing attention or ceasing anxiety too much in the perimeter, as in the peninsula of Korea. Through "the 9.11 terror", the vulnerability of the United State's homeland security has been exposed, giving a serious damage to the national pride. President Bush started the war against terror to strengthen global joints of anti-terrorism, identify terrorists and contribute to the global peace, adopting offensive realism including preemptive attack concept which means to remove the threat preemptively. In today's reality of international politics, where the inhuman, indiscriminate, and anti-civilizational international terror became greater, extending to the stage of war, the international societies' agony and focus lies on how to banish it. The 9.11 terrorism, which is a new form of terrorism, is being distinguished from conventional terrorism into new terrorism. New terrorism is a new form of terrorism meaning that you do not know the enemy, the goal does not exist and they conscientiously use the weapons of mass destruction. This paper is a work meant to help understanding new terrorism, the new form, by a comparative analysis with the conventional terrorism. Therefore the origin, concept and general characteristics new terrorism is picked out and the representative forms of it, which are suicide bombing, cyber, biochemical and nuclear terrorism, are analyzed in detail in theoretical manner.

  • PDF

Regulating Exclusion Clauses of the Seller's Liability for Non-Conforming Goods: Comparative Accounts (매도인의 하자물품책임 면책약관의 규제에 관한 비교연구)

  • Lee, Byung-Mun
    • THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
    • /
    • v.32
    • /
    • pp.29-56
    • /
    • 2006
  • This article primarily concerns the various aspects of the rules to control express terms particularly in standard form which seek to absolve either wholly or in part from the seller's liability for non-conforming goods. It describes and analyzes in detail how English law regulates such terms. In this analysis, it places the following questions; first, whether each jurisdiction treats the seller's liability for non-conformity in quality and quantity as mandatory rules, second, if it does, to what extent it is treated so and third, if not, in what way it controls the seller's attempt to exclude or restrict his liability for non-conformity in quality and quantity. In addition, it attempts to compare the rules under English law with those under Korean law and to evaluate them in light of the discipline of comparative law. In an attempt to evaluate them, it asks the question of whether a solution from one jurisdiction may facilitate the systematic development and reform of another jurisdiction. The evaluation is based upon the idea that the problems of fairness associated with the use of standard terms occur where the customer is unfairly taken by surprise due to his ignorance of the terms, or where even if he knows of the substance of the terms and objects to it, he is met with a take-it-or-leave-it situation.

  • PDF

International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements (법정지선택합의(法定地選擇合意)와 중재계약(仲裁契約)의 적용범위(適用範圍))

  • Kim, Sung-Hoon
    • Management & Information Systems Review
    • /
    • v.9
    • /
    • pp.165-177
    • /
    • 2002
  • The purpose of this comparative study is to compare and evaluate international arbitration and forum selection agreements. Recent decades have seen an unparalleled expansion of global trade and investment. Business enterprises of every description ann find themselves entangled in legal proceedings with foreign companies or government entities. Thus, the costs of these proceedings and the consequences of losing are often substantial. Almost, every international commercial controversy poses a critical preliminary question - 'where, and by whom, will this dispute be decided?' the answer to this question often decisively affects a dispute's eventual outcome. It can mean the difference between winning and losing. between de minimis damages and a multimillion dollar award. The same dispute can have materially different outcomes in different forums. Because of the importance of forum selection, parties to international contracts often include contractual dispute resolution provisions in their agreements. These provisions significantly reduce the uncertainties inherent in international commercial disputes, and can offer a substantial measure of partisan advantage. as a consequence, it is almost always advisable to include a contractual dispute resolution provision in any international contract. These provisions typically take the form of : (1) forum selection clauses, or (2) arbitration agreements.

  • PDF

A Comparative Study on Certain Procedural Issues of ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitrations (ICSID중재와 UNCITRAL중재의 중재절차에 관한 비교연구)

  • Seo, Kyeong
    • THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
    • /
    • v.43
    • /
    • pp.481-507
    • /
    • 2009
  • Along with continuous increase in international investments encouraged by wide spread bilateral investment treaties (BIT) including free trade agreements (FTA), international investment disputes have been also increasing. This means that a host State, an importer of foreign investments, and a investor who exports its investment to foreign State, need to take measures to prevent international disputes arising from international investment or to prepare for the arbitration for resolving the disputes. Under these circumstances, this paper compares ICSID arbitration rules and UNCITRAL arbitration rules in respect of (i) the institution of arbitration, (ii) the appointment of arbitrators and the composition of arbitral tribunal, and (iii) the procedures for, and the form of, arbitral awards. On base of this comparison, this paper further suggests certain practical issues that the host State's government and the foreign investors should be aware of in order to be ready for the resolutions of disputes by ICSID or UNCITRAL arbitrations.

  • PDF