• Publications of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 2021

We have analyzed 42 research papers regarding on the solar astronomy written by North Korea scientists to investigate the current status of astronomical activities in North Korea. The papers are surveyed from the 'Bulletin of Astronomy', the 'Physics', the 'Bulletin of Academy of Science', and the 'Natural Science' in North Korea, and SCI journals. In addition, we refer to the presentation material announced in the 2015 IAU by director of Pyongyang Astronomical Observatory (PAO) and the 2013 OAD/IAU reports. We have analyzed the papers statistically according to three criteria such as research subject, research field, and research members. The main research subjects are the sunspot (28%), observation system (21%), and space environments (19%). The research fields are distributed with data analysis (50%), numerical method (29%), and instrument development (21%). There have been 25 and 9 researchers in the solar astronomy and space environment, respectively since 1995. North Korea's solar research activities were also investigated in three area: instrument, solar physics, and international research linkage. PAO has operated two of sunspot telescope and solar horizontal telescope for spectroscopy and polarimetry, but there is no specific information on solar radio telescopes. North Korea has cooperated in solar research with Europe and China. We expect that the results of this study will be used as useful resource in supporting astronomical cooperation between South and North Korea in the future.

• Publications of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2020

We have investigated the North Korean astronomical articles published in five media such as the Rodong Sinmun (노동신문), Minju Choson (민주조선), Tongil Sinbo (통일신보), Munhak Sinmun (문학신 문), and Choson Sinbo (조선신보) for 15 years from 2005 to 2019. The astronomical articles were classified by subject to study the astronomical activity in North Korea. We have examined the perceptions of astronomy in North Korean society through the temporal variation of astronomical articles according to four subjects. As a result, we have found that there are many articles in the subject of Historical Astronomy and Astronomical News in the media. In the era of Kim Jong-un, the articles on the Historical Astronomy decreased while the Astronomy news tended to increase. We have also summarized the specific issues and topics including the change of the standard meridian, launch of satellites, astronomical news, and so forth. The North Korean astronomical article is a valuable resource to examine the current status of North Korea's astronomy and astronomical education. We expect the results of this study to be a useful resource in preparing for inter-Korean astronomical cooperation.

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.60.2-60.2
• /
• 2019

북한은 과학기술중시정책을 추진하면서 과학기술 우대환경을 조성하고, 전민과학기술 인재화 및 과학교육 강조 그리고 새 세기 산업혁명을 내세우며 자력갱생과 경제 발전을 위한 과학기술의 도구적 입장을 가지고 있다. 특수부문에서 강점을 가지고 있고, 기초과학 부문 및 정보기술영역에서 성과를 보여주고 있고, 국제학술활동에도 참여하는 등 얼마간의 대외 개방성도 나타내고 있다. 핵문제 즉 비핵화의 과제가 남아 있으나 남북 정상회담과 북미정사회담을 통해 남북교류협력의 여건이 나아지고 있고, 과학기술계 정부출연연구기관 소속의 연구자들이 북한연구과 남북협력을 준비한다. 대북 재제의 여건하에서 활성화될 수는 없으나 남북 과학자간 학술대회를 개최하고, 백두산연구기지 설립으로 백두산 지진 뿐만 아니라 천문 연구와 천연물, 광물 개발 등을 제안하였다. 앞으로는 남북과학기술협력센터 설립을 검토하고 보다 다양한 남북 과학기술 협력을 위한 기반 조성을 위한 향후 계획을 논한다.

• Publications of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2019

We compared and analyzed the astronomy terms currently used by astronomers in the two Koreas to promote inter-Korean astronomy cooperation. We analyzed a total of 2716 pairs of terms common in both Koreas glossaries, using the astronomical terminology contained in the South Korean source, the 'Terminology of Astronomy', and the North Korean source, 'Mirror 2.0'. For each pair of terms, their morphological features and meanings were compared. We categorized into 11 groups for comparison of astronomical terms. We found that most of the terms are used similarly in the two Koreas. About 47% of the total is similar in form. Although terms are different, meanings communicate about 37% of the total. As a result, similar terms used by the two Koreas correspond to about 85% of the total. However, 15% of terms are difficult to understand because they have different forms or meanings such as diffraction (회절/에돌이), flare (플레어/요반) etc. Further research on terms that are used differently by the two Koreas, and the conversion of appropriate terms through mutual understanding should be made in the future.