• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.486-501
• /
• 2012

The aims of this study are to investigate two main problems for the hypothetico-deduction method and to develop a scientific inquiry model to resolve these problems. The structure of this scientific inquiry model consists of accounts of the context of discovery and justification that the hypothetico-deduction holds as two main problems : 1) the heuristic flaw in the hypothetico-deduction method is that there is no limit to creating hypotheses to explain natural phenomena; 2) Logically, this brings into question affirming the consequent and modus tollens. The features of the model are as follows: first, the generation of hypotheses using an analogical abduction and the selection of hypotheses using consilience and simplicity; second, the expansion phase as resolution for the fallacy of affirming the consequent and the recycle phase as resolution for modus tollens involving auxiliary hypotheses. Finally, we examine the establishment process of Copernicus's Heliocentric Hypothesis and the main role of the history of science for the historical invalidity of this scientific inquiry model based on three examples of If/and/then type of explanation testing suggested by Lawson (International journal of science and Mathematics Education, 2005a, 3(1): 1-5) We claim that this hypotheticho-deduction process involving abduction approach produced favorable in scientific literacy rising for science teacher as well as students.

• 논리연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.83-116
• /
• 2010

이 글에서 우리는 토론 교육 특히 공학도를 위한 토론 교육에 필요한 논리 교수 학습 모형 을 제공한다. 이를 위하여 먼저 기존에 사용되고 있는 토론 관련 교재의 논증 개념과 논증 모형을 비판적으로 검토한다. 다음으로 토론에 필요한 기본 논증과 이에 대한 훈련 모형을 제공한다. 마지막으로 이공계 학생들 특히 공대 학생들을 위한 논증 방식 특히 토론에 사용될 논증 방식으로 가설 추론과 최선의 선택으로의 추론 모형을 제공한다.