• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.297-316
• /
• 2003

중국에서는 기록물의 분류를 정리분류와 검색분류로 나누어 활용한다. 본고는 그중 정리분류의 원칙과 내용은 무엇인가, 또 분류의 원칙이 실제 각 당안관의 기록물 정리에 어떻게 활용되고 있는가를 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 주요 분류이론서의 내용을 검토하고 나아가 중국 제 2 역사당안관의 민국시기당안의 분류와 전종구성의 사례를 분석하였다. 이 글을 기획한 목적은 조선총독부 공문서의 기록학적 분석을 위한 이론적 토대를 제공하기 위한 것이다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제11호
• /
• pp.123-143
• /
• 2005

1. Introduction : From the Memorial to the Records, From the Records to the Archives 2. Archivists and Historians : the Records Keeping, Appraisal and Selection 3. Records and Historical Materials in the Historical Narrative 4. the Relation of the Facts and Theory in the History 5. Conclusion In this essay I considered the relations of records and history, namely the process on the selection and choice from the records to the archives and the historical materials and in the process the role on the archivists and historians and difference and the relation of the facts and theory in the history. Archival science posits that an archives is the whole of the documents made or received in the course of purposeful activity, and of the relationships among those documents. Archival theory posits that it is the primary function of the archivists to maintain unbroken, continuing custody of societal archives, and to protect their integrity by keeping them physically and intellectually uncorrupted. The ultimate purpose of archival endeavors is to hand down to the next generations a reliable, trustworthy, and complete testimony of societal actions so that they can constitute sources of, and foundations for, future decision making. However, historical science searches for the truth in the historical facts, explains the cause and origin of the matters and reflects on th knowledge about the why and how the events happened. And history is firmly rooted on the philosophy. The goal of historian is analysing the nature of meaning of past in the society and tracing up the change and process of the transition. Archival science means historical source studies and other related disciplines. On the other hand archival management is the principle of respect for original order and the importance of original forms and conditions. Thus the relations between archival science and archives management are not one-sided but mutual. Archival science and historical studies, archivists and historians need to link more closely in order to hand down the contemporary memorial, the common memorial of mankind to the future.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.225-262
• /
• 2002

Chief Consultant Archives Government Archives & Records Service -table of contents- 1. Introduction 2. Relationship of Historical Studies and Archive 3. Relationship of Archives and Archives 4. Conclusion; Historians, Archives, and Archivists, and Their Roles This essay is mainly written for historians who may have "little or limited experience" in dealing with archives and archivists in their course of historical research. It may sound very ridiculous to say that "historians have little or limited experience" in using archives but it is also true that many Korean historians have depended on various compiled editions of historical materials or personally donated and/or collected materials when they do research, rather than they would visit archives and search for the materials by themselves. This is the main reason for that the public archives in Korea have not served historians well and effectively, and vice versa, that historians have not visited archives sometime with no knowledge of archives, and have not requested opening of archives for their research. It is a simple fact that historian's study depends on the records he/she uses. Without records, there should be no history. Use of archives for historical research is a common thing and a must in modern archives. Records are selected to be preserved in archives for their preservation as well as their future use. Who select the records as archives? Archivists do mostly. Then, what are the criteria for the archivists to chose records as permanent preservable archives? Answers to this fundamental question have been provided by many historians and archivists. The closest answer may be that selecting archivists would be better trained and equipped with historical research and knowledgeable of the major trends in historical research. With his/her own experience of historical research and tracing the trends of historical studies and materials used in the historiography, they could chose better and appropriate records for future use using their prudence and discretion. It also means that historians have had influence on archivists in their selecting archives by providing the theme and context of historical studies of the time. Though not necessarily becoming a historian themselves, selecting or appraising archivists should understand the process of creating the records and should know how they become archives. This is a precondition to become a good archivist. But that's not all. They must know how the archives are used and what archives are used for what purposes. Among many other roles of modern archivists, selecting and describing the archives are the foremost tasks of an archivist. Archivists therefore developed modern methods to select future archives based on functional analysis and records series concept rather than a record file or item as a unit of selection. Historians are users or consumers of the archives held in the archives building or repository. The quality of their study depends on the "quality" of the materials they use. With the help of archivists not to mention of reference service, historians owe much to archivists in having an access to the materials they need, intellectually and physically. Too many closed archives and too long closed archives in the archives repository would benefit neither historians nor archivists. However, archivists can mostly react only to archive requests and demands made by historians for more wide accessibility. Using the FOIA, as in the U.S., or the Information Opening Act, as in case of Korea, historians can promote the use of historical materials as well as promoting accountability and transparence for the benefit to society as whole. In this context, it is vary desirable to establish a close professional relationship between historians and archivists even in the age of information society. At present, historians need more understanding of operation and importance of archives while archives administration need to realize the potential archival demands from research community and civil movement for clean government.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제4호
• /
• pp.131-161
• /
• 2001

This paper is to examine the bibliographical description of the revolutionary historical archives and the standardization of the archives management in China. The standardization in the field of records and archives management was not initiated on its own way but as a part of national - leveled standardization. As a first step National Committee on Technical Standardization of Literature was established, followed by the establishing of Committee on Technical Standardization of Micro - filming and Committee of Technical Standardization of Paper Form. The standardization of the records and archives management was carried out in the context of functions of these three committees. In 1983 the standardization in the sphere of records and archives management speeded up, when the National Archives Administration formed small organizations which led the standardization work all over the country. A committee of standardization originated from small organizations and it brought a great progress of the standardization. If some opinions on standardization were submitted from records offices or related offices, they were examined by the committee of standardization. The opinions that were submitted by the committee of standardization were examined by the National Archives Administration which proclaimed it officially. The Chinese government commenced to establish the bibliographical data centre for historical archives and materials on the basis of this process of standardization. In the case of the revolutionary historical archives the description was made on the level of sources(provenance), which was sent to the bibliographical data centre for historical archives and materials. The Chinese government set digitalizing as a goal in records and archives management in the middle of 1990's. It was regulated that the description of records item that should be transferred to the center must be digitalized. However, the description of the file level was not made separately being reflected in the process of description of item level. (The second part of the paper will be released in the next volume).

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제7호
• /
• pp.75-105
• /
• 2003

Russian State Historical Archive (Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv - RGIA) received its present name in June 1992, and before 1961 was known as TsGIA. RGIA holds the major records of high-level and central state and administrative institutions and agencies of tsarist Russia from the eighteenth century to 1910s (except the records of the Army, Navy, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs), as well as fonds of social organizations, institutions, and individuals of prerevolutionary Russia. The main goal of this article is to assist understanding russian principle on arrangement and classification archives with its historical development focusing on one of the biggest historical archive in Russia. The primary set of historical records in RGIA remain arranged in 3-steps classification system: fond (collection) -- opis' (inventory) -- delo (file). In this general survey of RGIA author offers detailed information on the collection of archives and the system for classification of its huge amounts of primary sources in connection with influence upon historical studies. Despite the general economic crisis Russian archives are struggling to keep their doors open for public research and are exerting their energies in present electronic information to scholars and other researchers from throughout the world. The result, however, is not rewarded enough, considering the effort involved.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제53호
• /
• pp.161-200
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 J교육청 기록관에서 진행하고 있는 '학교역사관 조성사업'의 참여 학교들을 대상으로 학교 역사기록물 관리현황을 조사 분석하고 이를 바탕으로 학교역사관의 기록관리에 대한 개선방안을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 해당 사업에 참여 중인 7개교의 학교장, 그리고 사업 지원을 맡고 있는 J교육청의 기록연구사와 심층면담을 실시하였다. 면담의 내용은 학교역사관 조성사업에 대한 인식, 기록물 수집 현황, 정리 및 보존 현황, 서비스 현황으로 구성하였다. 면담 결과, 학교장들은 거의 1인 체제로 학교역사관을 운영하면서 많은 어려움을 겪고 있으며 교육청으로부터 지속적인 예산 및 인력 지원을 받기를 원하고 있었다. 이에 본 연구는 J교육청의 학교역사관 조성사업의 향후 나아갈 방향을 제시하고 학교역사관의 역사기록물 관리에 대한 개선방안을 제안하였다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제8호
• /
• pp.3-56
• /
• 2003

The purpose of the present study lies in understanding the historical context as well as regulatory and administrative restraints of records and archival management system of Korea, with the case of Korean Government Archives and Records Service(GARS). Insights gained from the historical analysis of GARS are expected to provide strategies to develop and reinvent GARS so that the national agency could be the basis of reforming Korean archival system in the future. The present study firstly reviews historical context of 1960s and 1970s, during which GARS was established, as well as its role and hierarchical standing in Korean administrative system. Second, its organizational system is analyzed, focusing on the extent of its specialization and organizational independence. Third, the study proposes to develop strategies to reinvent GARS through reinforcing the public records and archives management act(1999).

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.109-126
• /
• 2017

본 논문은 갈수록 그 중요성이 높아져가는 영상 아카이브 연구의 시론적 성격을 가지며, 일차적으로 영상 아카이브의 역사적 맥락을 고찰하는 것이 주요 목적이다. 이를 위해 우선 영상 아카이브의 바탕이 되는 영상 개념의 역사적 흐름을 검토하며 영상 아카이브 개념을 살펴볼 것이다. 그런 다음, 기록물로서의 영상 아카이브 그리고 장소와 기관으로서의 영상 아카이브를 다루면서 기존 종이문서 위주의 타 아카이브들(수집/보존/활용 등), 즉 공공기록보존소, 도서관, 박물관과 차별되는 영상 아카이브의 특이성들을 드러낼 것이다. 마지막으로 오늘날 디지털 시대의 영상 아카이브의 쟁점 중 디지털 포맷 및 복원 문제를 한정적으로 살펴볼 것이다. 이를 통해 본 논문은 향후 국내에서 정책적인 실천적 차원에서 설립되어야 할 다양한 영상 아카이브와 아직 걸음마 단계인 영상 아카이브 연구 활성화에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제5호
• /
• pp.209-242
• /
• 2002

Bibliographical Description for Revolutionary Historical Archives is created to describe records at the item level. It defines descriptive elements, punctuations, formats and methods. Descriptive elements are composed of 20 elements, each of which is either mandatory or optional. Mandatory elements are: repositories codes, documents codes, dates, creators, title, classification codes, and subject vocabularies. Abstracts were previously included in card cataloging and are removed in the computerized system. New elements, such as "uncontrolled vocabularies," "name of places," "personal names," "organizational structures" and "meetings," are added to allow keyword search. Considering that subject vocabulary searches are the most important in computerized systems, however, Guidelines for the Subject Indexing for Revolutionary Historical Archives as well as Subject Headings, as a result from the Guidelines, are created. The most extraordinary features in Chinese archival description are said to be the Guidelines for the Classification Indexing for Revolutionary Historical Archives and Materials as well as the Classification Scheme, both of which are created to allow subject search of records content. It is because Chinese practice of records management distinguishes the classification for arrangement from that for retrieval. Chinese archival description is, therefore, composed of bibliographic description rules, subject headings, and the classification scheme for retrieval.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.359-384
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 호남교회사 연구소의 디지털 아카이브 구축을 목표로 하고 있다. 특히, 지역적 특색을 가장 잘 보여주는 소장 기록물의 수집, 관리, 보존 및 활용에 있어서 공개용 소프트웨어를 활용함으로써 보다 효과적인 아카이브 구축방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 지역문화콘텐츠의 아카이빙은 지방자치단체의 문화산업정책과 맞물려 지역발전에 기여할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 아카이브 구축에 있어서 요구되는 기본적인 요구사항을 분석하기 위하여 인터뷰를 수행하였으며 이를 통하여 현재 관리의 문제점 및 아카이브 구축을 위한 고려사항을 도출하였다. 이를 통하여 현실적으로 여러 가지 제약이 많은 지역적 한계를 보다 효과적으로 극복하기 위한 방안을 제시하였다.