• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제10호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2010

What is Art on the street? Is it a series of artworks or activities performed on the street? In other words, does "art on the street" refer to "Street Art" such as street performance, happening, graffiti, or wall-painting, or does it refer to "Street Furniture" which is related to "City Design" or "Environmental Design"? In a formal sense, they all belong to Art on the street. However, in this paper, I would like to use Art on the street in an even broader sense. To me, " the street" is a metaphor of "environment." Thus Art on the street is the art related to environment; it is an environment art. Art on the street attests the expansion of the concept of art and shows a new possibility of contemporary art. It is a promising new concept of art, but we cannot ignore the misapplication of the concept that we can find at the crossroad of Art on the street and "city beautification." Of course, Art on the street can and sometimes needs to beautify the city. However we still need to ask how to contribute to the city beautification with Art on the street and how to validate such a practice. City space is, most of all, a space that people live in. It sounds a cliche, but it is worth repeating to better understand Art on the street. When we consider the city space in terms of its system or organization, we often overlook that it is the space in which people live, and which people create. Art on the street concerns not the city itself, but the space in which people live and make relations for each other. Without taking this into account, Art on the street becomes a mere means to' embellish' the city and falls prey to the logic of capital. In this paper, I critically reviewed the problems such as City Development, Spectacularization, City Environmental Design, Public Interest and City Museum. I intended to emphasize that Art on the street is produced in the cultural space of city, but it also tends to break the mold of the cultural space and seeks a new possibility. Some might argue that my claims are unrealistic because Art on the street is not an idea but a practice. While humbly accepting the objection, I hope my critical suggestions guide a more productive direction to continue our discussions of Art on the street.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제50권4호
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2022

산업구조의 변화와 함께 도시공간구조가 재편되는 것은 세계적인 현상이고, 중국은 대표적인 국가 가운데 하나이다. 중국의 수도권이라고 할 수 있는 북경-천진-당산으로 이어지는 경진당(京津唐) 지역은 공장과 공업단지들이 이전하고 남겨진 산업 이전적지들의 재생 프로젝트가 활발하게 진행되고 있다. 경진당(京津唐) 지역의 산업 이전적지 재생 사례들을 분석하여 사업의 특징과 목표, 설계 철학과 전략을 정리하고 시사점을 도출하여 향후 유사한 프로젝트를 위한 기초 자료를 제공하고자 하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. 연구 방법은 경진당 지역의 산업 이전적지 재생 프로젝트를 현지 답사를 통해 조사, 분석하고 문헌연구를 통해 귀납적으로 결과를 도출하였다. 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 경진당 지역의 산업 이전적지 재생프로젝트는 산업 유산 보호, 문화적 창의성, 공동체성 증진 같은 다원화된 목표를 추구하고 있다. 둘째, 대상지의 공간적, 장소적 특성과 산업유산을 존중하는 디자인 전략을 통해 새로운 디자인 내용과 대상지의 고유성이 조화되어 장소적 특징과 경관 효과를 최대화하고 있다. 셋째, 산업 이전적지의 생태적 복원에 초점을 두어 오염된 토양에 적응성 있는 식물과 자생식물을 위주로 식재하고 있다. 넷째, 조경 디자인은 조각이나 그래피티 같은 현대예술과 결합하여 대상지를 풍요롭게 하고 활성화를 촉진한다. 다섯째, 재생된 장소의 활성화 측면에서 도시적 이벤트와 대중 활동 프로그램을 적극 도입하고 있다.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.21-35
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 미수 허목의 정원 유적인 연천 은거당의 공간구성 및 정원적 특질을 구명하기 위해, "미수기언" 등의 시문과 고지도 그리고 소치 허련의 <연천 태령십청원도>를 중심으로 은거당의 입지와 핵심 정원인 십청원과 괴석원의 공간구성, 정원식물과 시설 등을 조사 분석한 것으로 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 은거당의 건물은 안채, 사랑채, 별묘 그리고 행랑채 등이며 정원은 안채와 별묘 사이의 십청원과 녹봉으로 이어지는 후원 그리고 사랑채 전정의 괴석원 등으로 모두 괴석을 정원시설로 중요하게 활용한 것으로 확인된다. "십청원기" 등 기문 분석과 후손의 인터뷰 결과, 십청원은 하도를 표방한 용도서를, 괴석원은 낙서를 상징한 귀문원을 구현하고자 한 석정(石庭)의 형태를 갖는 정원으로 추정된다. 또한 십청원에 도입된 상록식물은 용도서에 등장하는 십장청(十長靑)의 식물과 일치하는데 이를 통해 맑고 시원한 이미지를 추구한 것으로 판단되며 괴석과 함께 활용함으로써 성리학적 격물치지(格物致知)와 불로장생의 도가적 이상세계의 소우주를 구현한 것으로 이해된다. 또한 괴석원과 주변에 도입된 화려한 화목과 화초는 귀문원에서 찾을 수 있는 변화의 용(用)을 의미하며 십청원의 상록식물과 대비를 이룬다. 더불어 은거당 정원에 도입된 괴석은 미수의 전서체에서 느껴지는 기이함과 동질의 미적 대상으로서 창고미(蒼古美)와 고태미(古態美)를 창출하고자 한 것으로 파악된다. 궁극적으로 미수는 상록식물로 바탕을 삼고 화훼류로 변화를 꾀하며 기(氣)의 체(體)와 골(骨)에 해당하는 괴석을 둠으로써 그 뜻을 더욱 견고히 한 것으로 추론되며 이는 은거당의 정원적 특질로 귀착된다. 본 연구에서 얻어진 은거당 정원의 의장적(意匠的) 특질은 향후 은거당 복원의 기초자료로 활용되기를 기대한다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제8호
• /
• pp.59-87
• /
• 2009

This thesis started from the attempt to make it clear that 80's American artist Keith Haring(1958-1990) had conducted social intervention of criticism, resistance, and participation through his works, and so pursued public value. Haring of graffiti fame left popular and familiar cartoon style pictures on the street wall, the billboards, the posters and so on. Popular and playful works was explained as his unique characteristics, but Haring's creative way at the field has more value than just being grasped as artist's personal characteristics. Haring's work pieces became everyday art by joining with people's life, and are working as a social speaking place. So I think that these Haring's art works possess characteristics of 'the public sphere'. 'The Public Sphere' means that is independent and free from the government or partisan economic forces, so that is not connected with the interested relations, and that is the sphere of rational argumentation without 'disguise' or 'fabrication', and that is the sphere where general public can participate in and is inspected by them. The public sphere between the sphere of public authority such a nation and a market and the private sphere of free individual, it is mutually connected with them and works as the space forming public opinion. Private individuals communicate with this public sphere and perform a role of direct and indirect check, balance, and social criticism way off from power. Openness that should include the voice of not only leading power but also the socially weak such as citizens, women, homosexuals, minority races, and so on, and alienated class, is an index of the public characteristics. The public sphere is not working just with speech and mass media. Many artists as well as Haring open their mouth and act through an art at the center of society, and create another public sphere by an art. I understood that the real participatory and practical characteristics on the Haring's work is a phenomenon and current of a part of the art world including Haring. Such current started from 1960s is the in-depth effort to be connected with the life more closely, to communicate with people, and to improve problems of life. And it has pursued public value on the different way from the nation or public power. Artists have intervened in the society with strategic and positive ways in order to raise pushed-out value and sinked rights as the public agenda, and labored to accept the value of variety and difference at the society. The aspect of such social intervention is the notable features, findable on the Haring's works and process. Haring's works include art historical meanings and are expressed with familiar and plastic language, so they were able to communicate with various classes. And he secured various customers at the field and the street. This communicative and public approach factor raised the possibility much for his works to work as the public sphere. Haring presented critical and resistant speech toward society with his works based on this factor. He asserted his position and justice of gender identity as a sexual minority. And his such work continued to movement for alienated class and social week over his own rights. His speech and message on the wall painting, poster, T-shirts, billboard of the subway, and so on worked as a spectacle and pressed concern with social issues and consciousness shift. And he's been trying to protect and care people who is injured by HIV and drug and to realize social justice through social week protection. Haring's works planned to meet many people as much as possible performed its role of intervening in society through criticism, resistance, speech, and participation, and controlling and checking social issues. These things considered, Haring's works show his consciousness about public attributes of art, and obviously include public value seeking. And also we can find the meaning of such his work as that an art is working as the public sphere and shows the possibility to discuss and practice public issues.