• Title/Summary/Keyword: geostandard materials

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Preliminary Study for a Glass Geological Reference Material Using Obsidian (흑요암을 이용한 유리 지질 표준물질에 대한 예비 연구)

  • Jin, Mi-Eun;Jwa, Yong-Joo;Park, Sang Gu;Sun, Gwang Min
    • Korean Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology
    • /
    • v.33 no.1
    • /
    • pp.65-71
    • /
    • 2020
  • Glass reference materials have been essentially used for precise geochemistry analytical techniques. In order to make up for the drawback of synthetic glass reference materials, which have the high uncertainty caused by the difference in composition of natural rocks, we introduce a glass geostandard using natural glass. The NK-B1G sample, which comes from the Baekdusan obsidian, is a natural glassy rock that contains only few crystals such as microlites or inclusions. We examined the feasibility of the sample as a reference material for microanalysis like EPMA or LA-ICPMS.

A Preliminary Study of Korean Geostansdards Using Mesozoic Granites (중생대 화강암을 이용한 한국산 지질 표준물질 제작을 위한 예비연구)

  • Jin, Mi-Eun;Sun, Gwang Min;Park, Sang Gu;Jwa, Yong-Joo
    • Journal of the Korean earth science society
    • /
    • v.38 no.6
    • /
    • pp.421-426
    • /
    • 2017
  • In this study, we selected three representative granite samples and conducted petrological observation to establish the Korean geostandards. Samples were taken from the two Jurassic (KJG-1, KJG-2) and one Cretaceous (KCG-1) granites in South Korea. The powder samples were prepared by the standard pulverization process, and glass beads were made for geochemical analysis using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) method, and finally, major element contents of the samples were acquired. The analytical data are shown with mean, standard deviation and relative standard deviation. The accuracy of the analysis was confirmed within an estimated error range of about 5% by comparing the recommended true values of the USGS and GSJ geostandards. Also, we checked the analytical precision by calculating a relative standard deviation of about 3% from the XRF analytical results for the three samples.