• 제목/요약/키워드: general evaluation

검색결과 4,388건 처리시간 0.036초

융합교육 내실화를 위한 교양교육과정 평가 도구 개발 (The Development of Evaluation Tool in General Education for Enriching Convergence Education)

  • 김대영;현민철;김정민
    • 한국융합학회논문지
    • /
    • 제10권5호
    • /
    • pp.221-228
    • /
    • 2019
  • 대학의 교양교육은 전공교육에 비해 본래의 교육적 의의를 살리지 못하고 있다는 문제에 직면해 있다. 이 문제를 해결하기 위한 가장 시급한 단계는 바로 현재 각 대학이 편성 운영 중인 교양교육에 대한 정확한 진단에서 출발한다고 볼 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 대학의 교양교육을 평가할 수 있는 교양교육과정 평가도구의 개발에 목적을 두고 있다. 본 연구는 기존 선행연구들이 이론적으로 교양교육과정 평가도구를 단편적으로 나열한 것에서 벗어나, 평가항목 간 상대적 중요도를 AHP 분석기법을 통해 확인함으로써 평가도구의 배점을 결정하였다. AHP 분석 결과 교양교육과정의 편성, 운영, 평가 중 편성의 영역이 가장 중요하다고 나타났으며, 후순위로는 운영과 평가 영역으로 나타났다. 전체 22개 평가 지표 중 가장 높은 가중치로 결정된 지표는 "교과목 편성의 적절성"으로 나타났으며, 2순위로 "교양교육과정 목표의 적절성"이 선정되었다.

원자력 관련 정책 커뮤니케이션에 관한 상호인식 연구: 일반 국민과 원전 직원 간의 상호지향성 분석 (Mutual Perceptions between Nuclear Plant Employees and General Public on Nuclear Policy Communication Applying the Co-orientation Analysis Model)

  • 김봉철;김지현;정운관
    • 방사선산업학회지
    • /
    • 제9권1호
    • /
    • pp.37-46
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study examines mutual perceptions between general public and nuclear plant employees on understanding nuclear policy communication applying the co-orientation model. The total of 414 responses were analyzed including 211 of the general public and 203 of plant employees. Results indicate that agreement between general public and plant employees is relatively high, in that general public tends to have negative evaluation to nuclear policy communication, but plant employees tends to have positive one. In terms of congruence, general public perceive that plant employees might have more positive evaluation than themselves, and nuclear plant employees perceive that general public might have more negative evaluation than themselves. Finally, in terms of accuracy, general public accurately estimate how nuclear plant employees perceive on policy communication, whereas nuclear plant employees unaccurately estimate how general public perceive on policy communication.

Evaluation of dental status using a questionnaire before administration of general anesthesia for the prevention of dental injuries

  • Kyungjin Lee;Seo-Yul Kim;Kyeong-Mee Park;Sujin Yang;Kee-Deog Kim;Wonse Park
    • Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.9-17
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: Dental evaluation and protection are important for preventing traumatic dental injuries when patients are under general anesthesia. The objective of the present study was to develop a questionnaire based on dentition-related risk factors that could serve as a valuable tool for dental evaluation and documentation. Methods: We developed a questionnaire for dental evaluation before administration of general anesthesia, investigated the association between patient-and-dentist responses and mouthguard fabrication, and assessed response agreement between 100 patients. Results: Protective mouthguards were fabricated for 27 patients who were identified as having a high risk of dental injury. There was a strong association between dentists' responses and mouthguard fabrication, depending on the general oral health status, use of ceramic prosthesis, presence of masticatory pain related to periodontal diseases, gingival edema, and implants (P < 0.05). Response agreement between patients and dentists for items related to dental pain, loss of dental pulp vitality, root canal therapy, dental trauma, aesthetic prosthesis, tooth mobility, and implant prosthesis was high (Cohen's kappa coefficient κ ≥ 0.6). Conclusions: A high agreement was observed between patient-dentist responses and a strong association with mouthguard fabrication for items pertaining to ceramic prosthesis, masticatory pain, and dental implants. Patients with a "yes" response to these items are recommended to undergo a dental evaluation and use a dental protective device while under general anesthesia.

남.북한 약전에 대한 비교조사연구 (Comparative Study of the Korean Pharmacopoeia with North Korean Pharmacopoeia)

  • 최명신;강찬순;김혜수;김은정;홍정희;고용석;김상현;장성재
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제34권5호
    • /
    • pp.427-433
    • /
    • 2004
  • With the Sunshine policy, exchange of materials and cultures inter Koreas has been broadened and expectancy of reunification is getting higher. Especially, medical supplies and medicines are one of the biggest parts in the exchange goods. So, preparing an unified official drug standard preparing new medical administration system is required. We compared the Korean pharmacopoeia with North Korean Pharmacopoeia. Two pharmacopoeias have been developed in different direction and have many differences in the nomenclature and format. In this study, we compared general notices, general rules for preparations and crude drugs, monographs, general tests, processes and apparatus.

A STATISTICAL APPROACH FOR DERIVING KEY NFC EVALUATION CRITERIA

  • Kim, S.K.;Kang, G.B.;Ko, W.I.;Youn, S.R.;Gao, R.X.
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • 제46권1호
    • /
    • pp.81-92
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study suggests 5 evaluation criteria (safety and technology, environmental impact, economic feasibility, social factors, and institutional factors) and 24 evaluation indicators for a NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) derived using factor analysis. To do so, a survey using 1 on 1 interview was given to nuclear energy experts and local residents who live near nuclear power plants. In addition, by conducting a factor analysis, homogeneous evaluation indicators were grouped with the same evaluation criteria, and unnecessary evaluation criteria and evaluation indicators were dropped out. As a result of analyzing the weight of evaluation criteria with the sample of nuclear power experts and the general public, both sides recognized safety as the most important evaluation criterion, and the social factors such as public acceptance appeared to be ranked as more important evaluation criteria by the nuclear energy experts than the general public.

종합병원 로비 환경색채에 대한 감성평가 (Emotional Evaluation on the Environmental Color of the General Hospital's Lobby)

  • 박혜경;오지영
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제5권3호
    • /
    • pp.79-84
    • /
    • 2019
  • 본 연구는 종합병원의 환경색채가 사용자의 심리적, 감성적 부분에 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설 하에, 종합병원 로비의 환경색채에 대한 감성평가를 실시하였다. 이를 통하여 종합병원 환경색채 계획 시 보다 긍정적이고 심리적 만족감을 주는 환경색채의 요건을 고찰하고자 하는 목적을 가진다. 이를 위하여 국내 대형종합병원 8곳을 직접 방문하여 환경색채를 측색하였으며, 이를 기반으로 색채팔레트를 만들어 감성어휘평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 환경색채 감성평가에 영향을 미치는 색채요소 중 명도의 영향이 큰 것으로 나타났고, 명도, 채도의 범위의 편차가 클수록 감성반응에 부정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 파악되었다.

노인주택의 평가항목 설정에 관한 연구 (A Study for Setting Up the Evaluation Items of Housing for the Elderly)

  • 김현진;이경락;안옥희
    • 한국주거학회논문집
    • /
    • 제11권3호
    • /
    • pp.75-86
    • /
    • 2000
  • This study was conducted to develop standards for evaluating what extent the physical environments of housing which can cope with the needs of the aging society. To set up the evaluation items of housing for the elderly, the evaluation items were formulated after analyzing the items or indices presented by the previous studies. This study was proceeded with in such an order as setting up the scope of evaluation, setting up the areas of evaluation, and setting up the items of evaluation. The scope of evaluation was limited to the indoor spaces of housing as it was thought that the elderly spend much more time at indoors, considering their physical characteristics. The areas of evaluation were composed of seven areas; general matters of housing(14 items), bedroom(35 items), living room(24 items), kitchen(29 items), bathroom(45 items), toilet(40 items), and staircase(15 items). The items of each area included those relevant to general matters, heating and ventilation, light source, openings, and related equipment. Therefore, the items of the evaluation areas were 202 in total.

  • PDF

Outcome evaluation method를 이용한 신.재생에너지 보급보조사업의 평가결과 및 시사점 (Evaluation of renewable energy deployment program using outcome evaluation method and its implication)

  • 문창권;허은녕
    • 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국신재생에너지학회 2009년도 추계학술대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.300-300
    • /
    • 2009
  • Outcome Evaluation은 미국의 DOE(Department Of Energy)산하 EERE(Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)에서 프로그램 평가를 위해 사용하는 General Program Evaluation Guide에서 언급된 5가지 평가방법 중 하나로 프로그램의 결과를 측정하여 평가하는 방법이다. 이는 프로그램을 시행한 후 일정한 기간이 지난 뒤 프로그램의 목적을 달성함으로써 얻어지는 결과를 추산하여 그 기간 동안 프로그램이 의도했던 목적을 위해 얼마나 잘 수행되었는지를 보여준다. 본 연구에서는 Outcome Evaluation을 이용하여 한국에서 진행되고 있는 신재생에너지 보급사업에 대한 평가를 하였다. 현재 한국의 신재생에너지 보급사업은 크게 보급지원제도와 기반조성사업으로 나누어져 있으나 본 연구에서는 보급지원제도에 중점을 두어 평가를 진행하였다. General Program Evaluation Guide에 따르면 Outcome Evaluation의 방법론은 engineering estimation에서 survival analysis에 이르기까지 다양한 방법론을 제시하지만 본 연구에서는 Tabulation과 Correlation을 주로 활용하였다. 먼저 평가의 대상이 되는 프로그램과 시기를 정하고 평가지표를 산정한 뒤 위와 같은 방법론을 활용해 평가를 진행했고, 그 시사점을 도출하였다.

  • PDF

미디어파사드를 적용한 건축외관조명의 평가구조 추출 및 이미지 평가에 관한 연구 (A Study on Evaluation Construct Model Extraction of Building Exterior Lighting applying Media Facade and Image Evaluation)

  • 김성희;박지영;이진숙
    • 조명전기설비학회논문지
    • /
    • 제29권5호
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2015
  • In this study, we derive an evaluation structure and 18 Valuation vocabulary for the media facade lighting conditions. In addition, this study deduced the applicable elements that could be applied in time of building nightscape lighting design using media facade by conducting affective evaluation. The research results are as follows: It was found that the image axis of "Dynamic, Colorful" showed the lighting change speed was fast with diverse application of lighting color, and its evaluation object applied by general emphasis, vertical emphasis, partial emphasis lighting method was highly assessed. In addition, it was found that "Luxurious, Unusual" axis showed lighting change speed was slow with the application of lighting color in warm hue series, and its evaluation object applied by line lighting, dot lighting, general emphasis lighting methods was highly assessed. Lastly, it was found that "Soft, Secure" image axis showed the lighting change speed was slow with the application of pastel tone lighting color, and the evaluation object applied by general emphasis lighting method was highly assessed.

General program evaluation을 이용한 미국 태양광 보급정책 평가사례연구 (The Case Study for Evaluation on the Solar America Initiative Program Using General Evaluation program)

  • 이유아;김연배
    • 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국신재생에너지학회 2009년도 추계학술대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.301-301
    • /
    • 2009
  • The General program evaluation guide is intended for use by managers of both deployment and R&D programs within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), although most of the examples of evaluations pertain to deployment programs(EERE,2006). It could help managers determine what kinds of timely adjustments may be needed in program design or implementation to improve the rate or quality of achievement relative to the committed resources. To consider the adaptation of the method in Korea, we have studied the evaluation case for solar america initiative using cost-benefit evaluation. The President's Solar America Initiative (SAI) was launched in January 2006 as part of the administration's Advanced Energy Initiative. The SAI has a goal of installing 5-10 GW of photovoltaic (PV) systems in the U.S. by 2015 and 70-100 GW of PV systems in the U.S. by 2030. The evaluation report presents estimates of the potential benefits should the SAI PV installation goals be achieved. For this analysis, the areas researched include energy, economic, and environmental benefits. As a result, research suggests that 500 MW of PV may have been enough to avoid lackout. The ability of PV to prevent specific blackouts will depend on very specific information on where the PV installations are installed and their ability to relieve pressure on the high stress points on the grid. While this level of detail is outside the scope of this study, it appears that there will be some potential benefit for blackout prevention should the SAI PV goals be achieved.

  • PDF